It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Were terrorist clever enough to infiltrate the pentagon?

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 08:37 PM
link   
After watching a few videos about the flight that crashed into the pentagon on 9/11 i started to think, why the was footage that was released so crappy? the plane was certainly too big to make that small hole. were terrorist clever enough to have some how gotten inside the pentagon, planted some bombs, and gotten out with some information contained inside? maybe a missile?

[edit on 4-11-2009 by ^anubis^]




posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 08:55 PM
link   
No, most definately not. First off a plane did not hit the pentagon, a missle did. Secondly, the hole was round, not that of a planes, and too perfect for bombs. Thirdly, and lastly, the pentagon is one of the most secure and protected buildings on earth. You think that every single person in their is not examined thoroughly and checked to make sure they have no weapons, let alone bombs, or even the necessary items to make bombs?



posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by ^anubis^
 


Do you realize that real life doesn't work like the cartoons? It isn't like when wylee coyote runs through a wall and it leaves a whole the exact size and shape he was.



posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 08:56 PM
link   
not to be rude.

but if the terrorists were that clever then surely they would not have needed aeroplanes to blow up loads of people and monuments and they would have just blown them up?



posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 08:57 PM
link   
reply to post by 3mporer
 


lmao youre right



posted on Nov, 4 2009 @ 11:44 PM
link   
reply to post by HotSauce
 


Good point, but it sure did on the twin towers, the way that aluminum just sliced the steel outside of the buildings like a hot knife through warm butter.
Hm.



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 12:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Libertygal
 


The twin towers wasn't built like a fortress as the Pentagon is.

Differant building materials means differant damage patterns. But you knew that.



posted on Nov, 5 2009 @ 07:55 AM
link   
Yeah they were. His name was Rumsfeld.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 05:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by HotSauce
 


Good point, but it sure did on the twin towers, the way that aluminum just sliced the steel outside of the buildings like a hot knife through warm butter.
Hm.


When you have 125 tons moving at 450+ miles per hour it could have been made of wet spaghetti and it would have made a hole.



posted on Nov, 6 2009 @ 06:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by damwel
Yeah they were. His name was Rumsfeld.




You are correct that the terrorists were in the White House. 911 absolutely was an inside job.

The terrorist group they put in the pentagon was called "Office of Special Plans". It was headed by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and others.

Google "Sibel Edmonds" for more info on these miscreants. Edmonds was a FBI translator in the wiretap section. Her revelations of high-level Bush administration criminal activity have been called credible by several congressmen, the inspector general of the FBI and FBI agents. The $20 question is: Why weren't these criminals prosecuted?




[edit on 6-11-2009 by praxis]



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join