AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the ATS Skunk Works discussion forum.  (rss)


Were terrorist clever enough to infiltrate the pentagon?




Topic started on 4-11-2009 @ 08:37 PM by ^anubis^

DIGG ATS

for original
content
more info

After watching a few videos about the flight that crashed into the pentagon on 9/11 i started to think, why the was footage that was released so crappy? the plane was certainly too big to make that small hole. were terrorist clever enough to have some how gotten inside the pentagon, planted some bombs, and gotten out with some information contained inside? maybe a missile?

[edit on 4-11-2009 by ^anubis^]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more ATS Skunk Works topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 08:55 PM by kingoftheworld


No, most definately not. First off a plane did not hit the pentagon, a missle did. Secondly, the hole was round, not that of a planes, and too perfect for bombs. Thirdly, and lastly, the pentagon is one of the most secure and protected buildings on earth. You think that every single person in their is not examined thoroughly and checked to make sure they have no weapons, let alone bombs, or even the necessary items to make bombs?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 08:55 PM by HotSauce


reply to post by ^anubis^



Do you realize that real life doesn't work like the cartoons? It isn't like when wylee coyote runs through a wall and it leaves a whole the exact size and shape he was.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 08:56 PM by 3mporer


not to be rude.

but if the terrorists were that clever then surely they would not have needed aeroplanes to blow up loads of people and monuments and they would have just blown them up?



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 08:57 PM by ^anubis^


reply to post by 3mporer



lmao youre right



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 11:44 PM by Libertygal


reply to post by HotSauce



Good point, but it sure did on the twin towers, the way that aluminum just sliced the steel outside of the buildings like a hot knife through warm butter.
Hm.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-11-2009 @ 12:00 AM by Bored To Tears


reply to post by Libertygal



The twin towers wasn't built like a fortress as the Pentagon is.

Differant building materials means differant damage patterns. But you knew that.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-11-2009 @ 07:55 AM by damwel


Yeah they were. His name was Rumsfeld.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 05:48 AM by OverlordQ


Originally posted by Libertygal
reply to post by HotSauce



Good point, but it sure did on the twin towers, the way that aluminum just sliced the steel outside of the buildings like a hot knife through warm butter.
Hm.


When you have 125 tons moving at 450+ miles per hour it could have been made of wet spaghetti and it would have made a hole.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 06:34 AM by praxis


Originally posted by damwel
Yeah they were. His name was Rumsfeld.




You are correct that the terrorists were in the White House. 911 absolutely was an inside job.

The terrorist group they put in the pentagon was called "Office of Special Plans". It was headed by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and others.

Google "Sibel Edmonds" for more info on these miscreants. Edmonds was a FBI translator in the wiretap section. Her revelations of high-level Bush administration criminal activity have been called credible by several congressmen, the inspector general of the FBI and FBI agents. The $20 question is: Why weren't these criminals prosecuted?




[edit on 6-11-2009 by praxis]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.




















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.023 seconds
Page processed in 0.056 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.