It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The state-controlled banking system has given out a record $1.27 trillion in new loans this year, and some analysts have warned that too much of that money has ended up in stocks and real estate.
It is my opinion based on what I see, not what I wish for, that we will soon need to use our skills to survive what we will know as the most terrible planned and premeditated assault on our nation.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The US isn't buying as much products from China as we were. They have to make up for that slump in business by stimulating their own economy somehow. Can you say possible real estate bubble?
Your source
The state-controlled banking system has given out a record $1.27 trillion in new loans this year, and some analysts have warned that too much of that money has ended up in stocks and real estate.
Edit to ADD: Their stimulus and growth during this period wont really help the world economy. They are simply going to start using up their own productivity excesses at home by selling their products and services to themselves.
Don't expect a major contribution to the global economic recovery from them any time soon. Unlike the US recovery when it happens we will start importing products and service from overseas and that will help the global economy.
[edit on 22-10-2009 by SLAYER69]
Despite an impressive rebound, an innovation shortfall may hobble sustainable growth
By Beijing's own admission, the economic model that has powered China for three decades can no longer be counted on to move it forward. The mainland has prospered largely through construction and by exporting all manner of consumer goods churned out in low-wage factories; workers parked their savings in state-run banks, which then loaned the money to companies to make more stuff.
But technology and managerial knowhow came mostly from multinationals, and the costs—pollution, decaying social services, and a yawning gap between the urban rich and rural poor—were largely ignored. Though that model has fueled phenomenal growth, Hu and others now call it "unbalanced" and "unsustainable."
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by sligtlyskeptical
You know whats really funny....
There is almost a cheering section here at ATS about the USs economic slump. Either they don't know or just ignore the fact that if they really want the global economy to recover they need the US back in the game.
China has an export based economy. Sure they'll spend money abroad and it may help a few countries around the world momentarily but not on the scale of the US 14 Trillion dollar a year economy when it's game is on. We are an import based economy. We use twice as much products and services than we produce and that extra comes from other countries. Which means jobs in their country.
Go China!
[edit on 22-10-2009 by SLAYER69]
There are already signs that Beijing's policies are undermining the transition to a more balanced economy that might propel growth around the world. Over the past decade, consumer spending—what should be the mainstay of a new Chinese economy—has slumped from 45% of gross domestic product to 35% and now stands at about half the U.S. level. A full 88% of this year's GDP growth, Morgan Stanley's Roach estimates,
But with China's exports down 15% in September—the 11th consecutive month of decline—Dongguan is reeling. In the Changping district, once dubbed "little Hong Kong," shuttered factories are overgrown with weeds.