posted on Oct, 13 2009 @ 03:08 AM
As with the evidence of evolution could you explain that please?
Found this on the web.
Children believe the Theory of Evolution because they have been brainwashed by the education system. Kids are taught that life can evolve given enough
time. This is a false statement without any scientific support. They are taught that if given enough time, a monkey at a typewriter could punch keys
at random and eventually type President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. This is nonsense. These government-educated kids actually believe this
nonsense. Just ask one of them. Time does not make impossible things possible. As an example, a computer was programmed in an attempt to arrive at the
simple 26-letter alphabet. After 35,000,000,000,000 (35 trillion) attempts it has only arrived at 14 letters correctly. What are the odds that a
simple single cell organism could evolve given the complexity of more than 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations all in the correct places?
Never in eternity! Time does not make impossible things possible. Don't believe that nonsense.
Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of
generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing? The idea that birds or anything else has million-generation evolutionary plans is
childish. The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution, natural selection.
Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or
another. Take fish for example. We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's
examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air. This could happen. Fish do stupid things at times.
Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs?
That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story. The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He
chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water. Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for
millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of
drowning in the water. One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard. If you believe this
evolutionary nonsense, you need psychiatric help.
Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period. The fossil record (petrified bones found in the ground as at the
Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA) shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the
transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.
Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They
claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck. This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not
reach. One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted
higher than stretched horizontally in front of them. The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie. The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an
undergrowth eater. The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of
Natural Selection. Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of
the river. This is typical of the stupid logic of an evolutionist.
The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution. This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic and
scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking species and claim they evolved one from another. The human "family tree" is an
example of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most
promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man. They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the
picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes,
elephants or the Platypus. The pictures are placed in all of the textbooks that evolutionists use to teach kids this nonsense. The pictures are simply
a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution.
Close to the Missing Link -- Oldest Human Ancestor Discovered.
Why do they claim the above discovery is "close to the mission link." The answer is simple. Look at the picture. It is a monkey. A monkey species
that has become extinct. Lot of species have become extinct. Thousands of species have become extinct. It is obviously not similar to a human. Look at
the feet with the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee, not like people. A newly discovered extinct species does
not prove a "missing link" has been found. Don't let them brainwash you with this nonsense.
Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution."
Well, these transitional links have never been found. We only find individual species. Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link
according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin was hopeful that
future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong.
The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process. If evolution were true, all plants, animals and
insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species. All life forms would
be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species. Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect and plant
would be different. The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code.
Evolutionists Go Ape Over Ape-Girl.Evolutionists are going ape over "Ape-Girl."
The fossilized bones of a new animal have been found in Ethiopia near the site where "Lucy" was discovered many years ago. By the way, Lucy was a
monkey, not an early humanoid. The number of bones of the Ape-girl skeleton are unique because Lucy had only a few head fragments. This find gives us
a lot of information about the animal because major parts of the skeleton were unearthed (assuming these are all from the same animal). It has teeth
in the jaw and is said to also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw. The evolutionists call the animal a "human-like" female child about three
years of age and an "individual." This is not a "human-like" fossil. It is an "ape-like" fossil because it was an ape. Duh!
The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional species" and a human ancestor even though it has a head exactly like a modern-day ape. The jaw is
thrust forward and the forehead pushed back and slanted. The true appearance is more easily seen from side picture below.
Ape-girl also has arms "that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled
at swinging through trees." It looks like an ape. It has a head like an ape. It has arms like an ape. It has shoulder blades like an ape. It is
obviously an ape, not a human, pre-human or humanoid. Evolutionists simply will not accept the obvious. This animal is simply a young ape. Its size is
as would be expected for a young modern-day ape.
Scientists call these ape-like features "evolutionary baggage." In other words, these scientists are discrediting their own evolutionary theory of
"natural selection." They are calling the ape-like features unnecessary "baggage." The theory of natural selection is not supposed to have
unnecessary baggage, remember?
The age of this fossilized animal is also very much in doubt. Scientists many years ago claimed a tooth found was Nebraska Man, a pre-human fossil
millions of years old. They determined the age of the tooth. The scientists had sculptured an entire ape-like skeleton from information they found in
one tooth. These lies were exposed when real scientists found the tooth to be from a modern-day pig.