I think the philosophers would be disappointed to find they've been reduced to a series of one-liners. It's sort of like reducing the Magna Carta
to "Hey -- you guys! Stop doing that!" and the American Constitution to "Order is a nice thing."
They were interested in people learning HOW to think -- how to reason, how to hold discourse, how to find truths, how to tell truth from fiction,
large problems in ethics (and what, exactly, truth and ethics were.)
One of the examples I like (and found a convenient page on) is "What is piety?" Socrates' victim starts listing things ("being prayerful,
remembering sacrifices, doing the Right Thing, etc") and Socrates hops up with "What's right? The gods often contradict each other."
This leads to the bigger question in ethics: "is something 'pious' simply because religion says a diety loves the act (like burning "clean" or
"approved" animals on an altar dedicated to the deity) or is there a piety that even the deities acknowledge (meaning that gods can act in an
impious way)?"
It goes on to some interesting ideas about "what is moral" -- but you can read about it here:
www.philosophypages.com...
To understand the background of THAT discussion, however, you have to understand Greek ideas of formal debate and logic.
They had some great quotes -- but it falls far short of the very deep discussions that they would rather have been remembered for.