It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sum-one
Just the fact that the live coverage 'failed' at the vital time, tells us that something suspect was going on. IMO.
Originally posted by sum-one
Originally posted by Flighty
Okay, how do we know they weren't delivering something to the Moon rather than bombing it? Getting all the bits and bobs ready for Project Bluebeam for instance?
Well the 'delivery' speculation would explain why there was no expected
dramatic plume. And why the live coverage was stopped.
The what-ever-it-was could have been slowed right down as it approached the surface.
Originally posted by zorgon
Lunar Camp Fire
Found by Sherpa ATS member
www.lpi.usra.edu...
Originally posted by Somamech
I'm keeping my eyes on Gridkeeper as they would have their scope honed in
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by Somamech
I'm keeping my eyes on Gridkeeper as they would have their scope honed in
GridKeeper? The guy who tried to fool everybody that the stars were actually motherships in earths orbit?
Heck, I would even take NASA's word over his.
Anyway, here is his videos of this spectacle: Link
[edit on 11-10-2009 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by Somamech
Well we all roll different ways.
Find another scope on earth which shows what they do and let me know.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Originally posted by Somamech
Well we all roll different ways.
Find another scope on earth which shows what they do and let me know.
I dont think his moon picture is real.
But it would be nice if it was.
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by Duvant
5) Did NASA only see what we saw in Low Res?
We saw the same stuff that they did.
Originally posted by sum-one
Maybe NASA was DELIVERING water to the Moon???
Canisters of hydrogen and oxygen - to be re-assembled into water in a secret underground base?
Which would not only provide water but also the energy that comes from the re-uniting of those gases.
Just a thought...LoOoOoOol
Originally posted by fieryjaguarpaw
I definately remember one of the people involved with the mission saying that the live feed was of a lower quality than what NASA recieved.
When I heard this my ears perked up because it reminded me of Apollo, and how we got seriously degraded versions of that as well.
If somone can give a good reason as to why NASA brodcasted a lower quality video then what they claim to have recieved from space then I would love to hear it.
Originally posted by ROBL240
You'd have thought verification of impact would have been picked up by the Seismometers left after the Apollo missions
Originally posted by olegkvasha
Below is a video of Ranger 8 impacting the moon on 20 February 1965 1965! look at the footage quality
the ENTIRE ranger program cost around $170 million.... for 9! different spacecraft!