It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to post by oozyism
So you are saying the Iraqis are savages who can't control themselves? Do they need a brutal dictator to keep from killing each other? We gave them freedom, and they killed each other. This is our fault?
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to post by oozyism
I didn't say anything about Al-Qaeda. The US doesn't have to perpetrate a civil war. The Sunnis and Shiites are fighting a 1400 year old religious dispute, that will never end unless one side is wiped out.
Since we went there to steal all of Iraq's oil and other riches, wouldn't a peaceful Iraq be far more beneficial, than one in civil war?
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to post by oozyism
If you have never known freedom, you wouldn't understand the concept.
No, they started fighting again because there was no brutal dictator to keep them in line.
What, are you kidding? Iraq was a war-zone during the Ottoman Empire, with factional clans fighting each other non stop. The British colonialists ruled with an iron fist, often burying Iraqis in pig skins so they wouldn't go to Allah.
Saddam Hussein used mustard gas on Kurds in northern Iraq during a 1987-88 campaign known as the Anfal. The worst attack occurred in March 1988 in the Kurdish villageof Halabja; a combination of chemical agents including mustard gas and sarin killed 5,000 people and left 65,000 others with severe skin and respiratory diseases, abnormal rates of cancer and birth defects, and a devastated environment. Experts say Saddam launched about 280 chemical attacks against the Kurds.
Islam
Today, the majority of Kurds are Sunni Muslim, belonging to the Shafi school. Mystical practices and participation in Sufi orders are also widespread among Kurds.[81] There is also a minority of Kurds who are Shia Muslims, primarily living in the Ilam and Kermanshah provinces of Iran, Central and south eastern Iraq (Fayli Kurds).
Saddam Hussein's popularity in the Muslim and Arab world varied greatly, depending upon whom one asked and what the political situation at the time was. Because of his repression of the religious Shi'ite minority in Iraq and his long war with Shi'ite Iran, it was difficult for Shi'ite Muslims to find anything good to say about Hussein. In addition, because of his staunch secularism and his secularization of Iraq, it was been difficult for devout and conservative Muslims of any type to think well of him.
Originally posted by nastalgik
The great thing about this is that let's say your "fellow humans" end up spreading radical Islam and establish the global caliphate. When they cut your head off I will be laughing
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to post by oozyism
Really? I figured you to be Jordanian or Saudi. You clearly need to read some history, if you think all was peaceful during the Ottoman Empire in Iraq. I recommend A History of Iraq by C. Tripp.
No one benefits from the fighting. It is hard to steal their oil and riches in the throws of a civil war.
Originally posted by ashnomadonte
reply to post by oozyism
So you must agree that the chemical attack on the Kurds was one of the reasons for the fighting.
Originally posted by oozyism
ZZZ Once again, Sunni and Shia... Stick to one point than jump the hurdle.
Iraq
Shī‘ī-Sunni discord in Iraq starts with disagreement over the relative population of the two groups. According to most sources, including The CIA World Factbook, the majority of Iraqis are Shī‘ī Arab Muslims (around 65%), and Sunnis represent about 32% of the population.[40] However, Sunni are split ethnically between Arabs, Kurds and Turkmen. Many Sunnis hotly dispute their minority status, including ex-Iraqi Ambassador Faruq Ziada,[41] and many believe Shia majority is "a myth spread by America".[42] One Sunni belief shared by Jordan's King Abdullah as well as his then Defense Minister Shaalan is that Shia numbers in Iraq were inflated by Iranian Shias crossing the border.[43] Shia scholar Vali Nasr believes the election turnout in summer and December 2005 confirmed a strong Shia majority in Iraq.[44]
The governing regimes of Iraq were made mainly of Sunnis for nearly a century until the 2003 Iraq War. The British, having put down a Shia rebellion against their rule in the 1920s, "confirmed their reliance on a corps of Sunni ex-officers of the collapsed Ottoman empire". The British colonial rule ended after the Sunni and Shia united against it.[45]
The Shia suffered indirect and direct persecution under post-colonial Iraqi governments since 1932, especially that of Saddam Hussein. Under Saddam public Shia festivals such as Ashoura were banned. It is said that every Shia clerical family of note in Iraq had tales of torture and murder to recount.[46] In 1969 the son of Iraq's highest Shia Ayatollah Muhsin al-Hakim was arrested and allegedly tortured. From 1979-1983 Saddam's regime executed 48 major Shia clerics in Iraq.[47] They included Shia leader Mohammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister. Tens of thousands of Iranians and Arabs of Iranian origin were expelled in 1979 and 1980 and a further 75,000 in 1989.[48] Shia opposition to the government following the first Gulf War was reportedly suppressed.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
See?
That's your problem Ooz you ignore real history and instead you go with that stuff in your head.
Iraq Sunni and Shi
Iraq
Shī‘ī-Sunni discord in Iraq starts with disagreement over the relative population of the two groups. According to most sources, including The CIA World Factbook, the majority of Iraqis are Shī‘ī Arab Muslims (around 65%), and Sunnis represent about 32% of the population.[40] However, Sunni are split ethnically between Arabs, Kurds and Turkmen. Many Sunnis hotly dispute their minority status, including ex-Iraqi Ambassador Faruq Ziada,[41] and many believe Shia majority is "a myth spread by America".[42] One Sunni belief shared by Jordan's King Abdullah as well as his then Defense Minister Shaalan is that Shia numbers in Iraq were inflated by Iranian Shias crossing the border.[43] Shia scholar Vali Nasr believes the election turnout in summer and December 2005 confirmed a strong Shia majority in Iraq.[44]
The governing regimes of Iraq were made mainly of Sunnis for nearly a century until the 2003 Iraq War. The British, having put down a Shia rebellion against their rule in the 1920s, "confirmed their reliance on a corps of Sunni ex-officers of the collapsed Ottoman empire". The British colonial rule ended after the Sunni and Shia united against it.[45]
The Shia suffered indirect and direct persecution under post-colonial Iraqi governments since 1932, especially that of Saddam Hussein. Under Saddam public Shia festivals such as Ashoura were banned. It is said that every Shia clerical family of note in Iraq had tales of torture and murder to recount.[46] In 1969 the son of Iraq's highest Shia Ayatollah Muhsin al-Hakim was arrested and allegedly tortured. From 1979-1983 Saddam's regime executed 48 major Shia clerics in Iraq.[47] They included Shia leader Mohammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister. Tens of thousands of Iranians and Arabs of Iranian origin were expelled in 1979 and 1980 and a further 75,000 in 1989.[48] Shia opposition to the government following the first Gulf War was reportedly suppressed.
The increase in attacks has often led to the drawdown of Western aid employees in a given country, and this has forced these organizations to rely heavily on local, mainly Muslim, employees to conduct most of the relief work in the most dangerous places. However, the track record over the past few years has demonstrated that local employees are every bit as likely to be targeted as their Western colleagues. This is in part due to the fact that jihadists declare that all Muslims who work with infidels are apostates and therefore no better than infidels themselves. (This is called the doctrine of Takfir, or apostasy, and the fact that the jihadists claim to have the ability to declare another Muslim an apostate is very controversial within Islam, as is the killing of non-combatants such as humanitarian workers.)
In Pakistan, local aid workers are dedicated to reaching the hungry, sick and dispossessed people they serve, and this makes them extremely vulnerable to attack because they operate in some very remote and dangerous places. They are far more likely to be working outside of the larger, more secure organizational offices and in smaller, more vulnerable clinics and food distribution points. Because of this, there is a high likelihood that if the organizational offices present too hard a target, these lower-level aid workers and smaller aid distribution points could be targeted in lower-level TTP attacks. This would be part of the TTP effort to derail what it perceives as the U.S. agenda to stabilize (or, in the TTP’s eyes, influence and control) Pakistan by providing aid to the people displaced by the fighting between the government of Pakistan and the TTP and its foreign allies.
Originally posted by oozyism
Originally posted by RankRancid
Reply to post by oozyism
Any man that has the balls to arm up and walk into battle for people he is protecting deserves respect.
Ohh what about the Jihadists, what do you suppose they are doing?
What they're doing is walking into a crowded area, it doesn't even have to have Americans around, and blowing themselves up while taking innocent women and children with them.
Cowards that kill themselves and innocent people deserve nothing except 17 crazy moaning chicks.
And who is more coward? The individual who kills by pressing a button far away from the fight> or the individual who is willing to give up his life to protect his people and land?
Getting ambushed or car bombed or raiding houses with weapons caches, that's really far from the fight... oh, and most Mujahideen aren't even Iraqi. They're not protecting their own people. They' don't care who they kill.
I'd swap all the virgins for one dirty skank as long as she leaves me to myself.
A former US soldier has been sentenced to life in prison for raping a teen and murdering her and her family while on active duty in Iraq. The jury failed to reach the unanimous verdict required for the death penalty sought by the prosecution.
Link
Yeah sure Americans get their virgins when ever they want, this is turning in to ranting. Can you say anything that is productive to the discussion?
The Army is a cross section of society. You're going to get bad people like this everywhere. It's obviously inexcusable.