alien walking my dogs (picture), page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 5-10-2009 @ 06:41 PM by debris765nju
reply to post by MR BOB


Congratulations, you have just been awarded the prize for the most wrong answers in a single paragraph. I do want you to try to prove your allegations, if you can't you are a hoaxer who is maligning a fellow ATS member without just cause. You have already admitted that you have not performed any tests to support your opinion. Are you sure you're not an alter ego of crakeur? ATS is set up to allow people with a myriad of points of view a medium to share those views with others. Just because you disagree with the posters and their ideas does not give you the right to take their voice away. You do have the option to not patronize this thread and to visit those threads you have an interest in. You might notice that my thread cannot be flagged anymore, so much for recognition. I am posting for a total of four people, so far the rest are just browsers. Sometimes those people you think are really far out or mistaken are right and the people who are actually farthest from the truth is you.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:23 AM by EyesII
reply to post by debris765nju



Debris:

I haven't had the time to play with some of your other photos yet. As soon as I do I will post my thoughts and my renditions of your pictures.

There is one thing that I do wish to point out. When imaging software is asked to change the lighting, it is using an algorithm to do so - call it process A. Then when you ask the software to darken the photo or area, it is using a different process (process B) which may not be the reverse of process A. The two processes are different, and what ends up happening is that you can never come back to the original photo if you use these processes back to back.

You can test this yourself by darkening an area of the photo, and then try to lighten the same area next. Your goal is to make the photo look like it did before the editing began. If the process was correct, there would be no difference in image brightness or darkness. But there is - so the software is using two different algorithms to adjust the picture. FXFoto is not Photoshop. They are not even in the same league.

I am not debating that you see or even feel these creatures, but using amateur photo software may be distorting the photos so bad that you are seeing what you want to see.

Again, I am not dissing you, or saying that you are making this up. I am only saying that the software you are using to work your magic is not the best, and it may be the cause of what you/we are seeing. By altering the photo so much, it is easy to loose track of what is going on in the photo.

All the heavily colored photos, the dark and high contrast photos, even the ones that are so grainy that it looks like a pointillism painting; they are all problematic as they have been altered to an extreme. I understand you wish to “bring out” these guys for us to see, but what you are really doing is altering the photos until what you suspect to be something, actually visualizes into something.

Sort of like – “I’ll keep on editing, and adjusting until I see what I want to see. I’ll make those Damned Critters come out!”

It is extremely difficult to make a judgment call on the low-light very blurry photos. Why, because of all the distortions in each photo. There is camera movement, object movement, blurry aliens, discolorations, and as if that was not enough, there are edits made by you to try and bring these guys out into view. There are too many things going on to properly analyze a photo.

I like photography a lot, and have taken many photos of forestry areas, bushes, trees, etc. In all of my shots, I have never seen any strange things or other abnormality that I could not rationally explain. Yes, I have toyed around with the lighting, contrast, gamma settings, and all of the other photo settings. I haven’t found anything yet.

I will review some of the other photos that you have placed on your thread. I will give them the due diligence that they deserve and post my finds and thoughts. Please give me some time to get to do that. It is time consuming and during the weekdays, I don’t usually have a lot of time to play with.

Hang in there Debris.

-EyesII



reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:52 AM by EyesII
reply to post by EyesII



Debris:

I wrote this a few posts back:

"Why would a radiant being want to "attack" you? Why would your alien friends want to protect you? It sounds like there is a symbionic (sp) relationship going on there. "You feed me, and I'll keep you alive." "

How do you know if the aliens are not playing "good cop / bad cop" with you? I'll protect you from those evil aliens if you do this...

The evil aliens may be the same as the good aliens. You may not be able to tell the difference. Certainly they would try to hide the difference if there was one, and they were playing this game with you.

I'm concerned that these guys are playing with your head - as in manipulating you to do their work.

Why did you have to go to pick them up when they landed? Why didn't they land in your back yard? Why would they want to come to your home?

-EyesII


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 11:28 AM by debris765nju
Originally posted by EyesII
reply to
post by EyesII



Debris:

I wrote this a few posts back:
I answered it a couple of quotes back, i didn't say attack.
"Why would a radiant being want to "attack" you? Why would your alien friends want to protect you? Because i can do things for them that they cannot do. It sounds like there is a symbionic (sp) relationship going on there. "You feed me, and I'll keep you alive." " Exactly, but they feed themselves.

How do you know if the aliens are not playing "good cop / bad cop" with you? I'll protect you from those evil aliens if you do this...
No bad cops around me. They are out there but not a threat to me.
The evil aliens may be the same as the good aliens. They are the same, just have different philosophies.You may not be able to tell the difference. Certainly they would try to hide the difference if there was one, and they were playing this game with you. They enter me, my flesh.....there is sharing and commerce.

I'm concerned that these guys are playing with your head - as in manipulating you to do their work. In my opinion and memory i am the instigator. I am satisfied.

Why did you have to go to pick them up when they landed? Why didn't they land in your back yard? Why would they want to come to your home?
I landed them in the mountainous regions because i did not have enough land to handle the number and size of craft. Just like a "pilot" guides ships into harbors and through difficult waters, i landed them safely and securely out of the way. Or something like that.
-EyesII



reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 01:17 PM by MR BOB
reply to post by debris765nju



if you want me to repllicate the effects it could be very very easily done, and i had actually done it on one photo, but decided screw it why the hell should i have to do this? and ended up delteting it.

watch this space.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 02:14 PM by ziggyproductions05
reply to post by MR BOB



could you please do so? and could you also include the many small reptillian like beings?


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 02:27 PM by MR BOB
reply to post by ziggyproductions05



i would do but i dont have the such a unique mind to be able to see these in the pic. so i dont know what they look like


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:34 PM by DaWhiz
reply to post by debris765nju



Was this film?
The ship looks like a rock formation and the pics look a lot like film that was used, rolled back into the canister then accidentally reused again.


reply posted on 19-9-2010 @ 04:18 PM by debris765nju
It is my intention to get this video out of the hoax forum. There has been no hoax, intended or otherwise perpetrated upon the ATS community by debris765nju. I have long maintained that the aliens who are beside, between and atop my dogs are invisible or nearly so. The main alien walking my dogs is the one on the left side, it kind of resembles the ilkley moor alien. Next is the head and neck of a young dark haired woman between the two dogs. Atop the head of the dog on the left is the pale head of another female, there is a blue color in her right eye and another beside her right cheek. There are dozens more around the dogs and in the yard.. I have videotaped the original photograph so i could guide you eyes to the beings that i say are there.

edit on 043030p://pm3030 by debris765nju because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Armed drones now flying over the US
  Posted 11 days ago with 118 member flags
FBI Agent Fleeing Massive Manhunt Warns "They\'re all insane."
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags
The USA has plenty of oil....we\'ve been saving it.
  Posted 6 days ago with 11 member flags
Alien Hologram Ring, 100% bonafide alien tech
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Hey Guys Did You Know There\'s No Such Thing As Aids ?
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
App used to make ghostly apparitions in photo [HOAX]
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Reptililan Shapeshifters: Are these videos genuine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 2 member flags
Ace Baker proves No Planes at WTC.
  Posted 5 days ago with 0 member flags