posted on Sep, 28 2009 @ 05:55 AM
reply to post by Mikey84
That is strange. I'd like to hear Zorgon's take on that one.
Nice find Mikey
So get this....I found another
camouflaged building - I found it while checking out your latest discovery:
40 30'53.66" N, 93 13'58.70" E
Now if you head East of this location, the whole area appears to have been censored:
*Note: I should point out that some will probably try to argue that this area is not censored/intentionally obfuscated, and will ignore the fact that
censorship can be accomplished by using older, lower quality images in place of more recent higher resolution/quality images wherein more detail can
be discerned. They may also ignore the other incidents where google has actively cooperated with governments to hide certain areas. I think Zorgon has
some good examples of this. (Hey zorgon - could you please post a couple for us?)
Thus far over five camouflaged buildings/locations have been posted on this thread, so an effort to conceal is being made. Whilst this may be a case
of coincidence, the odds are certainly against it being so; based on the evidence.
And this is not a bad thing. Not all conspiracies are bad; especially when it come to protecting secrets from the prying eyes who scan google earth.
Google conspires with us to conceal certain sites, so it should come as no surprise that other nations (even Asian ones) also enter into such
conspiracies with google to have their sites concealed from our prying eyes - Using older or lower quality images to do this is a less conspicuous
manner to hide things, and there will always be those helpful few who are willing to argue that such concealment is just a result of coincidence;
irregardless of the evidence.
...But there is always a slight chance they may might be right.
[edit on 28-9-2009 by Exuberant1]