reply to post by silent thunder
I don't know who's famous for it, but I have had that same philosophy my whole life. I always looked at it like this;
You need food, clothing, shelter and health care to survive.
If a woman can sew 100 shirts a week. She could have enough clothing for a year in only a few days.
If a farmer can grow thousands of pounds of potatoes in only a few months he can feed his family and have huge surpluses still after wards.
If a family could together build a new house in a few months, they would have one for themselves and be able to build a couple more every year.
Now, how is our distribution of wealth? It's crap. And what people earn is crap.
A builder should be making at least a million a year based on what extra he can provide every year. I know people in renovations and building that
can't afford to buy a house. But they can build one no problem.
The woman that sews, at the price of clothing today she could easily be making half a million.
That farmer, he could be rich too.
Now lets say we have a small community, 100 people, all the people in these fields have plenty of surplus, they pay the doctors, the entertainers,
anyone else who is in a non-producing field.
These people should be rich. Not only these people but the entire community should be rich. But in our society, we have been overproducing, we created
millions of useless jobs that forced producers to produce more and now we are going to hit the top where we can't sustain ourselves.
There is no reason for the people to be as poor as we our now. There has been some really irresponsible planning and irresponsible consumption.