It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jdub297
(I'd be willing to make a reasonable bet that 75% of the ATS members do not know what "M.A.D." is, without resorting to Google, Wikipedia, or YouTube)
jw
[edit on 21-9-2009 by jdub297]
Originally posted by jimmyx
obama still has 130,000 troops in iraq, adding 30,000 more in afghanistan,
The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict "will likely result in failure," according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained by The Washington Post.
yeah, right...he's a real pacifist
Originally posted by jdub297
Thus far, Obama's words don't match his actions, except where unions are involved.
Originally posted by jdub297
M.A.D. is mad, undoubtedly. But the threat of an effective response should be recognized as a real and valuable deterrent (just like a "Beware of Dog," or "These Premisies Protected By ... ." sign is), and should thus not be discarded without regard to the very real remaining threats.
(I'd be willing to make a reasonable bet that 75% of the ATS members do not know what "M.A.D." is, without resorting to Google, Wikipedia, or YouTube)
Originally posted by 12.21.12
You guys do realize that in most cases of disarmament that the stockpiles are most often sold to other nations right?
pointing nuclear weapons at major population centers is madness, and undeniable proof that there is something severely wrong with the human race.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
You guys do realize that in most cases of disarmament that the stockpiles are most often sold to other nations right?
Originally posted by 12.21.12
reply to post by buddhasystem
uhm....yes I do.
I haven't lived under a rock for the last ten years.
Without a doubt, if a nuclear weapon is used against a country, it could ignite a World War III.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
reply to post by buddhasystem
Uh no it wouldn't and if I knew of these so called instances it would probably take several pages to write.
Originally posted by Mak Manto
I agree.
This is a good move. Nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous. We need to be pulling away from these kinds of weapons.
No one wins in a nuclear war.
Originally posted by 12.21.12
reply to post by buddhasystem
Sorry my friend. But I did not just crawl out from under a rock.