It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Originally posted by Brainiac
reply to post by pteridine
"No one knows the sources of the UFO's; aliens, reverse engineered alien technology, or advanced human technology. All are possibilities and all are not exclusive."
Heh, do you realize you just stated that something exists where there has been no concrete proof of the fact you claim?
Instead you might try thinking with a more rational mind. There is a big difference between an open mind, and an irrational mind.
An open minded individual would be "open" to the "possibility" of Alien life existing, but an open mined individual would "not" state that in "fact" there are Aliens and Ufos and we just don't know the sources of them...
For instance. I personally believe that there is a possibility that there are other life forms existing on another planet. Look at Humans, we are proof that advanced life can exist, and in fact we are proof that worlds can sustain and support life and allow it to develop technology to actually leave a planet.
[edit on 9/21/2009 by Brainiac]
This is the heart of the problem, denying the reality of UFOs. It's gone beyond hearsay reports, the evidence is in the number of individuals who have witnessed non-human aerial phenomena. I've had 5 or 6 solid sightings and I videotaped one. No one, not anymore, is going to tell me that UFOs are not real. Aside from witness testimony, which I'm aware is meaningless without evidence but numbers do have a certain weight, there are the millions of photos/emulsion films/videos of things that no one on earth can claim ownership to.
All we are able to make are heavy metal things that once they lose power just plummet to earth killing almost all aboard. I do not accept any claim (without evidence, of course) that our or any government has any UFOs in storage and that they are back-engineering, etc. Nothing that is made by humans reflects any knowledge other than what's been developed through hard work.
I do not state that there are aliens, although we have to take into consideration what or who is piloting these exotic aerial craft and it sure as hell ain't humans!
I'm an open-minded individual AND I've had sighting of non-human craft! So there.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
reply to post by Skeptical Ed
In a see of madness, a sane man named Skeptical Ed emerges...
Thanks Ed for that reply. And know that I meant no offense at all, and I absolutely wondrously thank you for your actual skepticism, and your outlook (which accords to the Scientific Method) expressed in your posts here at ATS.
Welcome to my friends list I'm glad to have you here working with us to deny ingnorance
You might find the BOLA case of interest (linked in my sig line) or the Kecksburg Event (currently on the Main Page for the UFOs/Aliens forum).
I would welcome your comments in either investigation!
-WFA
Originally posted by Pathos
reply to post by Brainiac
I agree.
Quick exercise for everyone. If you want to think 'outside of the box', walk out into the middle of a large field. Make sure there are large bulky clouds, which seem like massive obstructions. While looking at the clouds casually, notice the proportion of them in relation to others. Also observe the distance between the bottoms and tops of the clouds. Observe the light relationships, which range from sunlight to dark. After you analyzed the clouds closely, allow your eye to change the shape of the blue sky into a dome. Now, look at the cloud again.
If you are able to see the clouds hanging within a snow globe shape, you will be taking your first steps in being more perceptive. You will soon realize that it is impossible for anyone standing on the ground to 'definitively' say they saw a 'alien made UFO'. Its impossible.
Cell-phone cameras cannot capture clear images beyond a few feet. Camcorders cannot capture clear images beyond a few miles. Even though you can own the most advanced video technology available to the public, it cannot get a clear shot at an object that is more than three miles away. You can see an object as a spot in the sky; however, you will never-ever be able to capture an airplane beyond three miles in detail.
Between the Earth's surface and the ISS space station, there is approximately 199 to 215 miles of atmosphere.
[edit on 21-9-2009 by Pathos]
Originally posted by masonicon
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by kleverone
Could you imagine a world without skeptics? It'd be hellish, people would be running around believing in all sorts of wild things. Grown men would be leaving offerings to the Easter Bunny believing it real, sailors would still be afraid to fall off the flat Earth, superstition and ignorance would rule the day.
Most good skeptics are willing to believe if the item in question is proven or shown to be theoretically within the realm of possibility (under the rules of the Universe as we understand them so far). Some of them, like you said, are arrogant and seem pompous, these I like to call Psuedo-Skeptics, the so-called professional debunkers (like Joe Nickell) who scoff at believers and will explain away anything and everything with a wave of their hand or will resort to tearing down the credibility of the witnesses no matter how expert the witness (I've seen military UFO witnesses on CNN get called liars )
But in truth we need skeptics, if everyone agreed on everything, especially without proof, the world would be a much weirder place...
What's happen if everyone is Skeptics?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Pathos
Cell-phone cameras cannot capture clear images beyond a few feet. Camcorders cannot capture clear images beyond a few miles. Even though you can own the most advanced video technology available to the public, it cannot get a clear shot at an object that is more than three miles away. You can see an object as a spot in the sky; however, you will never-ever be able to capture an airplane beyond three miles in detail.
Pathos my friend, while I agree in general with the point you are trying to make, I felt compelled to correct you on the minor details, like never say never, as in "you will never-ever be able to capture an airplane beyond three miles in detail". How about a qualifier like "most people will never do that"?
www.airliners.net...(F)/1526441/L/
Flying over Abruzzo during sunset. Photo taken with a telescope. 3000 mm focal length. The plane was about 15 - 20 km away.
While it says it's only 15-20km away, for some reason, it looks farther???
Actually I think this has to qualify as one of the most amazing photos ever taken, most people will never achieve this kind of result.
But if everyone would just go out and get a 3000mm focal length telescope lens (and a tripod, it won't work without that), we just might get some decent UFO photos! The problem is they're not very cheap or portable.
[edit on 21-9-2009 by Arbitrageur]
Originally posted by Brainiac
reply to post by pteridine
Oh and I did read your post, I would not make a reply if I hadn't. The first part of your post really did not help to provide proof or valid identity to anything flying around in the sky, that is unusual. That's why I only focused on what YOU really thought.
I only saw that you really believe that UFO's come from some place other than Earth.
My whole point is that as far as the eye can see aided and unaided, all the activity centers around our Planet. The very same planet that contains hundreds of millions of vehicles of all variety known and secretly unknown...
When you look through a telescope and when we travel even to the other planets in our solar system, we see nothing "unnatural" occuring...
It's like sitting on an Ant hill and feeling something crawling on your skin, what's it more likely to be an ANT? or a SPIDER?
Originally posted by Brainiac
reply to post by Pathos
Ah hah, good post!
this is so true...
Unless you have SuperVision, you can't make out the details of anything 1000's of feet away from you... A plane at 10,000 feet looks like a plane, but a plane at 50,000 feet looks like? A fuzzy orb of light, it all depends on the conditions, the light, etc...
Then we don't even want to begin to start on night time sightings... You can barely make out the shape of a car at night, and people want to believe that they are seeing Aliens flying in Space Craft, I can't accept that conjecture.
This even gets more ridiculous, when you contemplate the possiblity of an Alien Craft being here. I'm sure they would NOT need to use any sort of light emitting technology. WE use radar and sonar for navigation for example, yet we can barely survive away from our planet.
Why would an Alien Craft need or use Navigation lights/anti-collision lights? Or emit any light for that matter.
There are just so many questions that open up in regards to this subject.
[edit on 9/22/2009 by Brainiac]
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
A little primer on open-mindedness and "thinking outside the box"...
[edit on 22-9-2009 by DoomsdayRex]
Originally posted by Pathos
That is why I keep saying - You need "absolute proof" to convince skeptics (such as ourselves)
Originally posted by Jordan_The_Maori
Most skeptics think that Aliens dont exists due to the fact ''Their isn't enough evidence to prove that their is life outside our World''.
Originally posted by Jordan_The_Maori
I think that some skeptics are just snobby pr*cks...
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
How about not entering our atmosphere but above it?
How do you feel about NASA footage of UFOs fleeting over the lunar surface, one in particular going in the opposite direction of an approaching lunar lander? How about filmed flashes from craters and were not talking reflective surfaces? How do you feel about watching shuttle cameras zooming in on objects at a distance? Or from the shuttle tracking, for the longest time, a hauling UFO? Or...