It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pai mei
reply to post by silo13
Thanks But what kind of thread should I start ? Start one if you want , I am not sure of the question
I wanted to show that no society can be composed only of "cavemen", "brutes". It would disintegrate. Imagine the bad guys - the mafia kill us all. Only mafia left on Earth. But inside - they cannot kill each other no matter if they are "the bad guys". Else they disappear. It's not in their interest. This violence inside a group - and the group still remaining as it is, cannot exist.
Unlike traditional Western societies of the time, many pirate crews operated as limited democracies. Pirate communities were some of the first to instate a system of checks and balances similar to the one used by the present-day United States and many other countries. The first record of such a government aboard a pirate sloop dates to the 1600s, a full century before the United States' and France's adoption of democracy in 1789, or Spain's move to democracy in 1812. [28]
Both the captain and the quartermaster were elected by the crew; they, in turn, appointed the other ship's officers. The captain of a pirate ship was often a fierce fighter in whom the men could place their trust, rather than a more traditional authority figure sanctioned by an elite. However, when not in battle, the quartermaster usually had the real authority. Many groups of pirates shared in whatever they seized; pirates injured in battle might be afforded special compensation similar to medical or disability insurance.
There are contemporary records that many pirates placed a portion of any captured money into a central fund that was used to compensate the injuries sustained by the crew. Lists show standardised payments of 600 pieces of eight ($156,000 in modern currency) for the loss of a leg down to 100 pieces ($26,800) for loss of an eye. Often all of these terms were agreed upon and written down by the pirates, but these articles could also be used as incriminating proof that they were outlaws.
Pirates readily accepted outcasts from traditional societies, perhaps easily recognizing kindred spirits, and they were known to welcome them into the pirate fold. For example as many as 40% of the pirate vessels crews were slaves liberated from captured slavers. Such practices within a pirate crew were tenuous, however, and did little to mitigate the brutality of the pirate's way of life
Originally posted by pai meiTowards other groups. Never inside the group. If they do it inside the group : that is a "civilization". Each man for himself . Gollums. Police.
But people are not evil and materialist "by nature". Give them a group that accepts them unconditionally and they will be happy to participate in that group with a gift economy. People seek this, today we have no "us", only "fight against all" , and for what ?
See the Iroquois Confederacy. Giant tribes, communities with no police, can exist. Also there were thousands of tribes that were not "warrior tribes". They saw war as a foolish thing to do, their confrontations with the neighbors were more like rituals.
Also see this :
en.wikipedia.org...
Unlike traditional Western societies of the time, many pirate crews operated as limited democracies. Pirate communities were some of the first to instate a system of checks and balances similar to the one used by the present-day United States and many other countries. The first record of such a government aboard a pirate sloop dates to the 1600s, a full century before the United States' and France's adoption of democracy in 1789, or Spain's move to democracy in 1812. [28]
Both the captain and the quartermaster were elected by the crew; they, in turn, appointed the other ship's officers. The captain of a pirate ship was often a fierce fighter in whom the men could place their trust, rather than a more traditional authority figure sanctioned by an elite. However, when not in battle, the quartermaster usually had the real authority. Many groups of pirates shared in whatever they seized; pirates injured in battle might be afforded special compensation similar to medical or disability insurance.
There are contemporary records that many pirates placed a portion of any captured money into a central fund that was used to compensate the injuries sustained by the crew. Lists show standardised payments of 600 pieces of eight ($156,000 in modern currency) for the loss of a leg down to 100 pieces ($26,800) for loss of an eye. Often all of these terms were agreed upon and written down by the pirates, but these articles could also be used as incriminating proof that they were outlaws.
Pirates readily accepted outcasts from traditional societies, perhaps easily recognizing kindred spirits, and they were known to welcome them into the pirate fold. For example as many as 40% of the pirate vessels crews were slaves liberated from captured slavers. Such practices within a pirate crew were tenuous, however, and did little to mitigate the brutality of the pirate's way of life
Crazy Horse, Tashunkewitko of the western Sioux, was born about 1845. Killed at Fort Robinson, Nebraska in 1877, he lived barely 33 years.
As a boy, Crazy Horse seldom saw white men. Sioux parents took pride in teaching their sons and daughters according to tribal customs. Often giving food to the needy, they exemplified self-denial for the general good. They believed in generosity, courage, and self-denial, not a life based upon commerce and gain.
One winter when Crazy Horse was only five, the tribe was short of food. His father, a tireless hunter, finally brought in two antelope. The little boy rode his pony through the camp, telling the old folks to come for meat, without first asking his parents. Later when Crazy Horse asked for food, his mother said, "You must be brave and live up to your generous reputation."
It was customary for young men to spend much time in prayer and solitude, fasting in the wilderness --typical of Sioux spiritual life which has since been lost in the contact with a material civilization.
Originally posted by pai mei
Among your friends what do you do if one starts beating you ? Well - if he has gone mad and keeps beating you - he will be excluded from your group.
That was done in a tribe - for stealing, killing and such things. The members of a tribe were not perfect - but their organization has evolved trough thousands of years of people seeking happiness - and the tribe was the perfect form suited for that. It was not something someone thought about in one day.
That was their greatest punishment - exile. Of course the murderer could be killed by the victim's friends. If he did not ran away first.
But this was very rare. You don't go around stealing from people you know since you were little.
No, humans are not evil by nature. That is what we are taught and it's false.
My apologies.
Originally posted by silo13
A Skull that rewrites the History of Man!
www.independent.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)
The conventional view of human evolution and how early man colonised the world has been thrown into doubt by a series of stunning palaeontological discoveries suggesting that Africa was not the sole cradle of humankind.
Experts believe fossilised bones unearthed at the medieval village of Dmanisi in the foothills of the Caucuses, and dated to about 1.8 million years ago, are the oldest indisputable remains of humans discovered outside of Africa.
Originally posted by pai mei
reply to post by blueorder
Read more. About tribes. See the link in my signature, see all the links to the right in that blog.
Among your friends what do you do if one starts beating you ? Well - if he has gone mad and keeps beating you - he will be excluded from your group. That was done in a tribe - for stealing, killing and such things. The members of a tribe were not perfect - but their organization has evolved trough thousands of years of people seeking happiness - and the tribe was the perfect form suited for that. It was not something someone thought about in one day.
That was their greatest punishment - exile. Of course the murderer could be killed by the victim's friends. If he did not ran away first.
But this was very rare. You don't go around stealing from people you know since you were little.
The Iroquois Confederacy, same as the Sioux Confederacy - had no conquered people inside.
No, humans are not evil by nature. That is what we are taught and it's false.
[edit on 10-9-2009 by pai mei]
One mans evil deed is another mans good deed. I don't believe we are taught this, it's a matter of perspective and the the only thing thats taught is the term "evil"