It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He himself admits that someone else (who he never identifies) told him that the second explosion he heard was from the plane strike, which THAT person couldn't know because that person had to have been outside the building and wouldn't know what was happening inside. More likely, the first explosion he heard was from the plane strike and the second was a followup explosion caused by the plane strike.
Originally posted by jprophet420
1. You obviously disregarded or did not hear his testimony, however medical records and other witnesses confirm it. You should watch his testimony before you quote on it.
2. The news archives clearly show that the police suspected bombs. You don't stop suspecting that until you investigate it, no investigation took place.
Its likely that an explosion that came from the floor underneath was a plane strike? Where did you get that notion? He said the third explosion was the plane strike in his testimony. It is 100% certain that protocol was NOT followed in this scenario, so again, what are you afraid of? I have only heard one answer so far, even though so many vehemenently oppose.
You are contradicting yourself. If the building was "designed to absorb energy" as you say then there shouldn't have been *any* seismic activity reported, aircraft impact OR demolitions. The building would either absorb the shock or it wouldn't. Besides, every video footage in existence shows the initial structural failure was up at the ninety-somethingth floor, at the point of impact, and this cannot be refuted. Planting explosives below ground would have had no effect on the chain reaction of structural collapse above ground, and thus, would have been pointless.
[edit on 10-9-2009 by GoodOlDave]
...and who told you that no investigation took place?
2. The news archives clearly show that the police suspected bombs. You don't stop suspecting that until you investigate it, no investigation took place.
Its likely that an explosion that came from the floor underneath was a plane strike? Where did you get that notion? He said the third explosion was the plane strike in his testimony. It is 100% certain that protocol was NOT followed in this scenario, so again, what are you afraid of? I have only heard one answer so far, even though so many vehemenently oppose.
Originally posted by mmiichael
The Truthers will cry foul without a doubt. They will say they were deprived of access to every steel beam in the WTC, one and a half million tons of debris, hidden Pentagon photos, and on and on.
Originally posted by Lillydale
You assume way too much and your ignorance seems to grow daily. People like me simply want a real investigation. It would be nice if things were actually looked into and the hard parts to explain were not simply omitted. I would not cry foul at all if a real investigation took place and ended up confirming the OS. I just highly doubt that it would. Why else would so much be ignored, overlooked, left out if there was not some intent to promote a particular narrative.
Why is it that you cannot deal with facts? The present and the past would be good starting points. Talking about what 'truthers' may or may not do or say as a result of a second investigation.
You and your kind seem to love this little line. Telling us that we will not believe you anyway and that we will refuse to look at real evidence. Well, if the story you believe in is true, then why haven't you already provided this evidence that we can we can react to the way you predict we would? Where is it? Let's see.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by mmiichael
Mike, are you aware that those foreign enemies were practically invited into thge US, that many of them trained on US bases, and that some were actually housed by FBI agents?
You don't know the facts - you just assume.
Originally posted by mmiichael
We know what Truthers believe. There are hundreds of sources where they put their beliefs in clear unambiguous language. We also see clearly how they ignore facts in favour of selected snippets of information, dot connecting distortions, often even outright lies.
There is no bloody OFFICIAL STORY except in the deluded minds of those unwilling to acknowledge attacks on the US by foreign enemies. They have even told us so.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Then let me ask you the same question Jthomas refuses to answer.
If there is no official story, what would you like to call the narrative put forth to us by the president, vice president, and secretary of defense.
Originally posted by Lillydale
reply to post by mmiichael
Wow that is stretching it. What a load of babbling nonsense.
There is a story about 9/11. This story is that 19 middle eastern Muslim extremists hijacked 4 planes and crashed them into NY, PA, and the Pentagon.
This is the story we were told. This is the story that everyone is expected to repeat and believe. This is the story officials told us.
Originally posted by mmiichael
You really can't read. Anything you can't comprehend is nonsense.
A few thousand investigative reporters from all over the world, conclude the plot was hatched, co-ordinated, executed by Muslim extremists.
Noam Chomsky the most prominent vocal critic of the US government, thinks Muslim extremist did it.
Muslim extremists, some captured and testifying, say Muslim extremists did it.
Muslim extremist websites say Muslim extremists did it.
Of course that's all part of the big cover-up? Right?
Santa Claus did it. Reindeer seen flying over the Pentagon. They won't relese the pictures.
M
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by mmiichael
You really can't read. Anything you can't comprehend is nonsense.
Please read the underlined sentence and then tell me again how poor my reading comprehension is. When did I say I had trouble understanding something? When did I call anything nonsense?
posted on 13-9-2009 @ 11:41 PM
Originally posted by Lillydale
reply to post by mmiichael
Wow that is stretching it. What a load of babbling nonsense.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by mmiichael
You really can't read. Anything you can't comprehend is nonsense.
Please read the underlined sentence and then tell me again how poor my reading comprehension is. When did I say I had trouble understanding something? When did I call anything nonsense?
Well thanks for demonstrating what I didn't want to say. Your brain is fried.
Your exact words in this message:
posted on 13-9-2009 @ 11:41 PM
Originally posted by Lillydale
reply to post by mmiichael
Wow that is stretching it. What a load of babbling nonsense.
Commenting further would be a waste of time.
Hey! They found reindeer droppings on the Pentagon lawn.
Proof! It was Santa Claus.
Originally posted by Lillydale
Ok, you got me. You are absolutely right. I did call your postings nonsense. How about that. You win. You do post some complete nonsense.