It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by jprophet420
Why would I oppose a new investigation?
Two reasons, 1) it would be a waste of time and resources and, 2) when the investigation came to the same conclusions as the original, the truth movement would ask for another investigation.
1) it would be a waste of time and resources
2) when the investigation came to the same conclusions as the original, the truth movement would ask for another investigation
Originally posted by Rewey
Release the final 3 minutes of F93's CVR.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Rewey
Release the final 3 minutes of F93's CVR.
It would be difficult for the government to release something that doesn't exist. The "missing" three minutes is an urban myth; the CVR goes all the way up to the moment of impact.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by Rewey
Release the final 3 minutes of F93's CVR.
It would be difficult for the government to release something that doesn't exist. The "missing" three minutes is an urban myth; the CVR goes all the way up to the moment of impact.
Originally posted by Boone 870
reply to post by jprophet420
Why would I oppose a new investigation?
Two reasons, 1) it would be a waste of time and resources and, 2) when the investigation came to the same conclusions as the original, the truth movement would ask for another investigation.
Originally posted by jprophet420
What would happen if a new investigation were launched? Why are people opposed to it?
Originally posted by Seventh
Dave do you seriously think that after 503 first responder eye witness testimonies are relayed to a brand new commission, that they will disregard this approach?, remember this - no one stated out of any of the FR`s that the explosions were due to an inside job, it was a day of terrorism, how was it not the case that terrorists themselves planted the bombs?, and duly investigated.
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Hmm. There are several of those witnesses that heard 2 explosions BEFORE the first impact. So your theory is null and void untill investigated. It has also never been explained how the lobby exploded, nor how the b2 and b3 levels exploded. None of this is in the 911 commission report, all of this is on the news reports from the day.
Originally posted by Seventh
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave do you seriously think that after 503 first responder eye witness testimonies are relayed to a brand new commission, that they will disregard this approach?, remember this - no one stated out of any of the FR`s that the explosions were due to an inside job, it was a day of terrorism, how was it not the case that terrorists themselves planted the bombs?, and duly investigated.
Seismic data proves it, FR`s 19000 plus pages of evidence backs it, various videos show it how it was.
I very much doubt a fresh enquiry would overlook any of the three above, let alone all three, especially when this time WTC7 will feature heavily into it all.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Seventh
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave do you seriously think that after 503 first responder eye witness testimonies are relayed to a brand new commission, that they will disregard this approach?, remember this - no one stated out of any of the FR`s that the explosions were due to an inside job, it was a day of terrorism, how was it not the case that terrorists themselves planted the bombs?, and duly investigated.
Seismic data proves it, FR`s 19000 plus pages of evidence backs it, various videos show it how it was.
I very much doubt a fresh enquiry would overlook any of the three above, let alone all three, especially when this time WTC7 will feature heavily into it all.
Here is the result of your first responders investigation:
Investigator: "did you hear any explosions"?
FR: "yes".
Investigator: "was it from dynamite or explosives being intiated"?
FR: "how the hell would I know"?
repeat as necessary.
Originally posted by Seventh
Firstly - People whom do not believe the official story are not some type of leper and thus treated accordingly, most of us surprisingly are human beings, with children and live life accordingly, exactly the same as everyone else.
An interesting point here is that no seismic activity was registered re:- Pentagon impact which was nigh on ground level, it is assessed that a plane hitting a building a 1000 feet in the air + a building built to absorb energy would have a very slim chance of registering at all, the data recorded just prior to collapses registered 2.1 and 2.3, 80,000 lbs of sodium nitrate exploding in quarries (below ground) registers around 2.0.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Hmm. There are several of those witnesses that heard 2 explosions BEFORE the first impact. So your theory is null and void untill investigated. It has also never been explained how the lobby exploded, nor how the b2 and b3 levels exploded. None of this is in the 911 commission report, all of this is on the news reports from the day.
Originally posted by Seventh
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by Seventh
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave do you seriously think that after 503 first responder eye witness testimonies are relayed to a brand new commission, that they will disregard this approach?, remember this - no one stated out of any of the FR`s that the explosions were due to an inside job, it was a day of terrorism, how was it not the case that terrorists themselves planted the bombs?, and duly investigated.
Seismic data proves it, FR`s 19000 plus pages of evidence backs it, various videos show it how it was.
I very much doubt a fresh enquiry would overlook any of the three above, let alone all three, especially when this time WTC7 will feature heavily into it all.
Here is the result of your first responders investigation:
Investigator: "did you hear any explosions"?
FR: "yes".
Investigator: "was it from dynamite or explosives being intiated"?
FR: "how the hell would I know"?
repeat as necessary.
Source?.