Ladies and Gentlemen, the 2nd American Civil War is upon you., page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 68 times


reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 01:52 AM by dooper
reply to post by neformore



nefermore, I think the election of Obama is an indicator of your premise.

He and his crew were computer/internet/technology canny, and they made the most out of it.

Therefore, I think your premise is very insightful and clearly intuitive.

Hearts and minds. And misinformation. And skewed perspectives. And fabrications. Lies and videotapes.

That's why I prefer the shooting wars.


reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 03:07 AM by GORGANTHIUM
reply to post by neformore

Thats a funny way to put it but i believe i can see why you see the internet like that.There is so much infomation on the net.There is also so much disinfomation on the net too.You can breakdown disinfomation into three different catorgorys.The first type of dis-infomation is diliberate dis-infomation put out by employees of the goverment to confuse people and send them in the wrong direction.Theres are a lot of them on the net.Then there is catorgory two.People making up fake infomation ie-made up stories to confuse people and really make things alot more difficult to research.Then there is catogory three.Sometimes people think they are doing the right thing but by accident or misrepertation they make really bad mistakes with stories.Some of the goverment and military employees may look like they have retired,been sacked or left the goverment but in fact as still employed covertly by the goverment to spread dis-infomation



[edit on 5-9-2009 by GORGANTHIUM]

[edit on 5-9-2009 by GORGANTHIUM]


reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 04:37 AM by DeepCoverUK
reply to post by neformore



Spot on for me, S&F for you. Last week I was absolutely raging because of some blatant 'warfare' here on ATS and put a little something together, but forgot all about it until I saw your thread. Here is what I had drafted:

Internet under Siege.

For almost a year now, the internet has been under siege from agenda driven astroturfers, shills, disinfo agents, their sock puppets, spin and other propaganda methods.

Agenda driven political ranting is now commonplace on finance boards, tech blogs, alternate sites, motoring blogs, even in MMO games and almost anywhere else you can imagine.

Recently stories emerged about the internet possibly being taken over or shut down by government in times of crisis, rather than being outraged, I wondered if it would mean an end to the political tripe being vomited all over the internet and forced down everyone’s throats.

It appears that vast swathes of the internet is already under the control of the sensationalist news corporations who do the bidding of their would be kingmaker owners. The ‘new’ media has followed in the footsteps of its more traditional counterparts with relative ease and mostly unnoticed.

Whilst there are many paid shills out there, targeting specific internet sites with an agenda set by their bosses, the vast majority of these people are unfortunate victims of brainwashing by large media corporations who prey on peoples existing ignorance and fears.

Net neutrality is really a non-issue, extremely powerful people are now exerting their views across all areas of the internet at very little cost, with many ordinary people quite happy to spread their message free of charge.

I didn't get any further than that, after my mini personal rant, I felt better and forgot all about it (I have been avoiding all message boards for around a week now). For me there are three sides in this 'war' with the few people who can see what is going on becoming very irate and wishing it would all go away.


[edit on 5/9/09 by DeepCoverUK]


reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 05:19 AM by useless eaters
reply to post by neformore



"And if so, why are you fighting at all?"

I need the practice



reply posted on 5-9-2009 @ 09:02 AM by Walkswithfish
reply to post by neformore



Divide and conquer.

"Never waste a crisis"

Let them make war!

Exploit to the fullest any and every opportunity to push the masses left or right, never let them develop the ability to stand firm in the center. For there is the real threat to government.

Know your place, choose a side, let that side think for you, follow the rabbit of your choice to the wonderland of your illusion.


reply posted on 6-9-2009 @ 03:19 AM by Verd_Vhett
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
reply to
post by neformore


The problem stems from the fact that there are two camps that believe their way is the best way for the US. The Conservatives distrust any type of government oversight and fear taxes as if they were mustard gas falling from the sky, preferring to believe that an unrestrained society free of government intervention will lead to Utopia for all (all who care to work). The Liberals believe government oversight is the answer to individual protection and realize taxation comes with this oversight, and believe that since the government represents the populous (supposedly), it will inevitably act all of the population's interests with its laws and regulations.



Technecly that is how our government is supposed to be, our constitution is supposed to keep us from reaching either extreme, If both parties serve their purpouse things are fine, so thats not the problem, the problem is that both sides are moving towards total government, America has been involved in a power stuggle for decades now, and when the day arives when the governemnt has total power over us, that is the party that wins!



reply posted on 6-9-2009 @ 11:00 AM by neformore
reply to post by Leo Strauss



No fire from me, and that is most certainly not forgotten.

However, I'm talking about information warfare, not the blood and bullets kind - although oddly it can lead to that eventually.

The 2nd American Civil War, as I termed it, is an information war, not a shooting match - and I think we should all be thankful of that. Your post serves as a reminder of what happens when the talking stops.

I do fear that the information war could escalate to that scale though, if some of the rhetorical hysteria from both sides isn't toned down soon.


reply posted on 6-9-2009 @ 01:38 PM by readerone
I liked the you-tube guy yelling at his camara ,

in real life , I get alot of that when I am logical, polite , calm , and define my terms till they start calling me names and run away .

the sad news I have is that ... you are not seeing history in the moment .

harperferry is a good point of veiw .

you need to remember that political conversations were very loud and not so diffrent from now in 1860 .
leading into the presidentual eletion the very same ideas and debate was going on in 1858-1860 .

--------------------------------------

I have a sound file , I have no idea if it is real or not .
( never beleave any thing you read on the internet )
its petagry asserts that it was vidio camara in the pocket of a press-pass attendee , recorded as sarah brady , jane fonda and hilery clinton talked about a conservitive radio talk ( likly rush )host.
you can only hear one voice , and it is not clear .

the only thing important , that is not totaly exspected was in refrance to the internet , the voice said ,
" free speach is to important to leave in the hands of amatures "

it is clear what was meant , the internet is not controlled , am radio talk show hosts can be managed , but it is unexceptable the uncontrolled , loose cannon , free excersize of common people in un sensored intercourse of ideas .

may I suggest , I will defend the right of any one to say anything stupid and offensive .
I can handle myself in uncivil discord ... and let them look foolish by them self.

what I can not stand for and will attack with word and deed is the sensorship of civil ideas I don't agree with , I love making fools of the clowns , but I need clowns to make fun of.

how can you bedait a nazi , if their ideas are never heard ?
how can you point out that abortion is a medical issue , with no foundation in the constitution , or that bush put in place , what the lib/dem's agree'd with ... agreed to and supported .

how can you say to a animal rights person , children are paying the bills for what your asking , you can't have it both ways .

and the economic failure is a direct result of big goverment , tax money going to a fedaral goverment .

shut the money off and the problems go away .
change only one thing... pull the money out .

money is control , when people control their own money , the people control their lives .

its not hard to understand , its easy to see logicaly , but freedom is never easy to keep , and is easily lost to control freaks with other peoples money to spend .
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



The One Party System replaces the Two Party system in the U.S.
  Posted 2 days ago with 14 member flags
Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 16 days ago with 10 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
With all this talk about possible voter fraud...
  Posted 1 days ago with 1 member flags