It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by Curio
. . . I think that sometimes we have to trust the government to do what's in the interest of the people as a whole. . . .
stop it you're slaying me
wait . . . you are serious?
[edit on 9/3/2009 by Lemon.Fresh]
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
There is another posting on this as it deals with Massachuets. I am still trying to find out if the bill got approved or if it was in turn defeated. I hope it was cause the way it was written, pretty much covered any infectious disease that could be considered a threat to the general populace and it would be under the control, not of the Govenor or the legislator, but the person incharge of the health and human services of that state.
Originally posted by googolplex
On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests.” The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture
Quarantining folk en masse other than in a hospital setting is beyond folly and I seriously doubt there are plans for this. The likelihood of the spread opportunistic secondary infections would be so risky as to preclude this as an alternative altogether.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
let's say this isn't a conspiracy theory.
You would think the government would take some steps on preventing this information from leaking. You'd think this thread would be censored. You would imagine that website being censored.
Perhaps it's all about misinformation. Perhaps it really is just a conspiracy.
I guess my point is: If we were in any real threat of detention camps...we wouldn't be reading about it freely as we do.
Originally posted by icenine
All members of my family have had this H1N1 flu and it is not even as bad as last years flu. We were sick a few days and it was over, no one told us to stay home, and we continued to work and go to school. Most everyone in my town has already had H1N1 and no one is dead or was quaranteened.
Originally posted by nocensorshipplease
After looking at this it makes me wonder if Obama was telling us the truth the other day with his statement that the vaccine for H1N1 will be voluntary. Time will tell. I hope we can trust him.