Originally posted by JayinAR
reply to post by Diplomat
I alluded to it earlier in the thread.
If this was all the story, she would be dead.
So, this is an attempt to create intrigue and SHUT UP people who are onto the trail of the Government.
Not saying that the Turkish Government ISN'T involved, simply that they are an arm of the CIA, in this case and that the buck stops there.
>> I don't think it is THAT complicated. I'm just pretty sure that having Sibel hang herself like the DC Madam while under FBI "protection" is a
bit harder to explain -- she also has all her information in other hands, unlike the DC Madam's customer list that disappeared.
But I agree somewhat: Turkey is NOT the biggest buyer of US diplomats. Saudi Arabia, AIPAC, and the UAE likely own a lot more of our Press and
Washington. IF the Sibel Edmonds story gets out of control, thy will probably treat Turkey like a fire break, and burn it -- to keep the fire from
It would probably be a simpler task to find the handful of Politicians/CIA/FBI who are NOT compromised in some way.
I don't think Sibel was a plant, to misdirect everyone -- unless of course, this is engineered by the aforementioned other interests to get more
power. They could have kept the whole thing secret -- well, at least not in the consciousness of the everyday folks who follow the herd and think all
conspiracies are wacko -- without bothering to read actual court depositions that PROVE OFFICIALLY: The government concluded that the JFK
assassination was the result of a conspiracy, and held trials for other people, the Gulf of Tonkin event was bogus, the Lusitania incident was bogus,
it was proven in a Senate investigation that the CIA was smuggling drugs, the Iran/Contra affair was weapons given to anti-american factions (helping
them destroy pro-Western moderates in Iran) to NOT release hostages and it was paid for by drug running with Latin America.
We even have a police chief in the Lockerbie airplane bombing who is on the record saying that a CIA agent informed him that the ONLY evidence linking
Libya to the attack was planted (it was a melted circuit board). All people from Nairobi I think, suddenly decided to get off the plane, and two
targets of the CIA were diverted onto that flight -- don't have time to look up who they were. And don't quote me on the Nairobi thing, just trying
to remember what I heard on Mike Malloy -- anyway, that's not one of the "FACTS" but it's a case where EVERYBODY KNOWS it was Libya, yet there is
no proof other than that manufactured by the CIA who stood the most to gain.
If you don't think that they would do such a thing -- then remind us again of who tortured kids and women they knew to be innocent in Abu Ghraib,
GitMo and left people in Oil drums to die in the sun in Afghanistan... didn't those used to be conspiracy theories?
>> The problem is, you can poison your life by dwelling on this junk too much. Nobody gets much done, unless they have a notion that they will be
successful at accomplishing something good (well, those of us who aren't psychopaths at least). There are enough FACTS to blow out of the water, the
common misconceptions of all the "RATIONAL PEOPLE" who don't bother with conspiracy theories -- but ALL conspiracy theories, are judged by the most
Crackpot idea. The MSM never gets it right -- and the crazy people have to be 100% right. The burden of proof is totally unfair, but there you go.
The status quo and consensus of knowledge will remain the same -- and the Sibel Edmonds story won't go further unless we have a total breakdown in
the status quo -- which would mean Marshall Law, and then the people like Grover Norquist and Dick Cheney, and William Kristol who've been trying to
bring it down will have won.