Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
The only way I figure that this practive would make any sense is if the vaccine didnt work in the first place.

or...the vaccine serves some other purpose?
And why does the vaccine require two possibly three shots?

A live virus vaccine means being injected with a low dose of the actual virus, usually so that your body can build up immunity to it. At least that is the theory. So what I'm wondering is, why do you need a second shot several weeks after your body has had time to heal from the first?

To me it just does not make any sense.
There has to be more to it. Biological tracking or perhaps some sort of mutation or sterilization? Whatever it is, they obviously want people to get it, forcibly if required.

Well im just glad I live in the UK, I mean, our government is a bunch of idiots but yours takes the prize!!...... I mean how many people have died from the "Swine flu"???? 2000 max? out of how many billions on the planet?

Im certainly not worried about this.

However even if the government came clean abotu what it was doing, would it make the whole thing more acceptable? would it change anything?



nope.

This is simply Unconstitutional - period! There is nothing more to be said about it. This should be challenged to the highest court in the land. Next the voters of Mass. need to vote every single one of these cretins out of office!

People seem to love to jump on the hysteria bandwagon. How about we stop for a moment and think about this. Let's forget about the vaccine and whether or not it contains nanochips that program your DNA to turn you into a smurf or whatever it is for now and look at the larger picture.

The current strain of H1N1 is the first truly pandemic and POTENTIALLY dangerous outbreak we have seen in any of our lifetimes. It may turn out to be nothing. But it could very well turn deadly.

Let's imagine that there IS an H1N1 outbreak and the organism recombines into a truly deadly organism along the lines of the 1918 Spanish Flu. What do you, as legislator of your own private Idaho, do? Shall we just let people do whatever they want in order to protect their personal freedoms? Can we expect people to 'do the right thing' and quarantine themselves if they're sick? Or do we need to have some mechanism to protect public safety and control the spread of the disease?

This legislation does not force anyone to get the vaccine. It clearly states 'unable or unwilling'. But can we really allow a contagious person to go running about in the population? I understand the concerns but there is a practcal aspect to this that everyone is just overlooking.

How about a situation like Katrina? Should the government have the authority to force an evacuation ahead of time? Or should people be allowed to stay if they want and then require public safety people to come in and rescue them at great expense and personal risk?

I understand everyone's concerns. But I'll go on record right now and say that if things DO play out in the worst case scenario you'll be changing your tune. When you're standing in line at the grocery store trying to scrounge some food for your family and there are people coughing and sneezing all over the place and then you go home and infect your child... you'll think differently.

How does this not make the front page news of all cities? Talk about media censorship. It is scary that these laws are being enacted to supposedly "protect" us. I personally do not want to take the shot and will not do so.

It is very possible this is all a scare tactic by BIg Pharma. Think about d8 years ago when we had that anthrax scare and all the sudden the US by's a but load of Anthrax vaccine. And not to mention the Sh@t load of Cipro it stock pilled too. I wonder if all that is expired by now?? Usually antibiotics have a 1-2 yr life span.

I wonder how many of those senators and members of their family will actually take this toxic vaccine. Have they read about the ingrediants and do they know that several virologist who have worked with this vaccine and others are refusing it and one claims he will go "on the run" with his wife and family "very south of the borader" as in South America.

More people are waking up every day to fine a world gone mad. The facts are out their but still so many ignore them

Originally posted by jibeho

I am eager to see what happens after the first batch of violators are detained and fined. Sharpen those pitchforks now folks.

We need to set up a rogue's gallery of pictures of these politicians and their publicly available information -- career, location, assets, etc.

It would be my guess that in the event this "political decree" is ever enforced -- these legislators, their families and household pets will be pursued and "payback" will be the theme of the day.

People sometimes doesn't understand that the vaccine that is been put out there is nothing more than an experimental vaccine, how can you be forcibly injected with something that is experimental.

Only voluntarily you can do that.

Then why if the vaccine is so safe like water this crocks are trying to get immunity for the side effects?.

People, people, doesn't that ring a bell? some needs to start using reasoning.

[edit on 26-8-2009 by marg6043]

Thay are really turning the screws on our lives now. This is just the beginning of a well engineered plot, that has been in the pipeline for years.
Well, I for one will not be having any vaccine. Money is as real as their excuses for having the vaccine. So I will end up owing nothing.

Oh and guess how this will go largely unnoticed or mentioned in the MSM?

Ted Kennedy died, so that trumps everything.