Massachusetts Senate pass bill 2028: Quarantine or $1000 a day fine for refusing the vaccine , page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 96 times


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 08:46 AM by marg6043
reply to post by jtma508



Obviously you have not look into this Senators records, they are public you know.

His agenda to bring this type of legislation came about since the first signs of another pandemic was even noticed the bird flu.

Back them all his bills to forced quarantine in the state even when it was not danger of the bird flu pandemic were vote out.

So he has been following a trend, he is not just about the H1N1 he just wanted something to push an agenda that he has been planning for a long time.

That should ring a bell if you are a citizen of that state.

Still if you read the bill, quarantine is not limited to just pandemic of the H1N1 but any pandemic the state deems dangerous and on top of that authorities can detain you on suspicions of been infected with anything.

Another bell that should open any body's eyes.

The signs are all over the bill that is about agendas, private or personal, if they are private then corporate is involved, but personal then you have a very ugly individual with dreams of power over the people in their state.




reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 09:25 AM by spikey
reply to post by jtma508



Oh i'd say this is VERY profitable for the Phama companies wouldn't you?

Worldwide vaccinations X3 or X4? You do the numbers, and tell me they are not making record amounts of dirty cash out of this!

As for getting out of the 'vaccine business' (hit the nail on the head there, it's a business) due to liability for damages...haven't you heard? The governments of the WORLD have given not only the makers of this virus/vaccine total immunity from prosecution or damages claims following any injury or death to anyone being forced to have the junk in the syringe, but also ANYONE classed as a 'care giver', which broadly translates into ANYONE remotely connected with the manufacture, distribution and delivery and of course administration of this junk. Anyone involved.

So, you get given the jab...you develop an embolism in your brain or heart due to an air bubble in the syringe, because the laccy administering the junk, isn't competent...your family get told to get lost, there is nothing they can do...except roll up their sleeves for their turn of course.

Or the vaccine causes you to suffocate because your lungs no longer work due to the squalene or mercury or any one or combination of the other poisons contained in the junk syringe...nothing your family can do...accept roll up their sleeves for their turn...then if they survive...maybe they can scrounge together the money to bury you...

Look up the facts.


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 09:32 AM by djpleiades
Originally posted by jtma508
reply to
post by marg6043


Every vaccine carries risks with it. That's why the drug companies largely got out of the vaccine business back in the 70s. It wasn't profitable enough to begin with (because of the huge up-front costs and extremely short lifespan of the product) and the potential liability lawsuits made the risk just not worth it.

I remember reading a while ago about some bill Bush had passed, stating pharmaceutical companies were not liable for any personal injury ectect, and they could not be sued.

The vaccine industry is making its comeback.

Does anyone remember this, or have links to the proper article?

Update: This isnt the article i had read before, but its the same topic. Ive copied some key points of interest.


Bush protects pharmaceutical and insurance from lawyers


Democrats quickly accused Bush of trying to protect drug companies and favoring the medical industry and insurance companies who contributed mightily to his re-election campaign.

Nevada Democratic Sen. Harry Reid, the new Senate minority leader, said "Congress should not be giving a free pass to big drug companies at a time when millions of Americans may have had their health put at risk by pharmaceutical giants" responsible for drugs like Vioxx, which was withdrawn by Merck recently because of health risks.


article here: Bush protects pharmaceutical and insurance from lawyers


If anyone can find the this from a credible source that would be nice ^_^


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 09:33 AM by spikey
reply to post by grapples



But they won't say no though will they.

Certainly not in those numbers anyway.

I'd be willing to put money i haven't got down and bet that at the most 20% - 30% will decline. That works out at most about 20-30 Million. Having said that, the real numbers refusing on the back of this forced legislation will probably only be around 5 - 10 million out of 300 million...

Just an estimate of course, but you know how people are...if they think they are missing out on something that will save them and theirs (most do not frequent sites such as this, and swallow the MSM line totally), they will be DEMANDING this crap in their millions.

All it will take is they MSM ramping up further in the fall/winter, reporting that hundreds or thousands amongst the un-vaccinated are dropping like flies, and you watch the clamoring and fighting that takes place to secure their dose!


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 09:37 AM by DevilJin
Originally posted by spikey
reply to
post by jtma508



Oh i'd say this is VERY profitable for the Phama companies wouldn't you?

Worldwide vaccinations X3 or X4? You do the numbers, and tell me they are not making record amounts of dirty cash out of this!

As for getting out of the 'vaccine business' (hit the nail on the head there, it's a business) due to liability for damages...haven't you heard? The governments of the WORLD have given not only the makers of this virus/vaccine total immunity from prosecution or damages claims following any injury or death to anyone being forced to have the junk in the syringe, but also ANYONE classed as a 'care giver', which broadly translates into ANYONE remotely connected with the manufacture, distribution and delivery and of course administration of this junk. Anyone involved.

So, you get given the jab...you develop an embolism in your brain or heart due to an air bubble in the syringe, because the laccy administering the junk, isn't competent...your family get told to get lost, there is nothing they can do...except roll up their sleeves for their turn of course.

Or the vaccine causes you to suffocate because your lungs no longer work due to the squalene or mercury or any one or combination of the other poisons contained in the junk syringe...nothing your family can do...accept roll up their sleeves for their turn...then if they survive...maybe they can scrounge together the money to bury you...

Look up the facts.


I heard that this stuff, if taken, will work against your immune system in that because the immune system is usually good at being resistant to certain illness, this crap will make the immune system go nuts because it spreads everywhere and the immune system can't contain it. It is just a theory. But still there is no consensus on what the vaccine is for - depopulation, weakening, sterilization, or a combination of sorts. I firmly believe it will do some damage though.


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 09:45 AM by djpleiades
Originally posted by DevilJin
Originally posted by spikey
reply to
post by jtma508



Oh i'd say this is VERY profitable for the Phama companies wouldn't you?

Worldwide vaccinations X3 or X4? You do the numbers, and tell me they are not making record amounts of dirty cash out of this!

As for getting out of the 'vaccine business' (hit the nail on the head there, it's a business) due to liability for damages...haven't you heard? The governments of the WORLD have given not only the makers of this virus/vaccine total immunity from prosecution or damages claims following any injury or death to anyone being forced to have the junk in the syringe, but also ANYONE classed as a 'care giver', which broadly translates into ANYONE remotely connected with the manufacture, distribution and delivery and of course administration of this junk. Anyone involved.

So, you get given the jab...you develop an embolism in your brain or heart due to an air bubble in the syringe, because the laccy administering the junk, isn't competent...your family get told to get lost, there is nothing they can do...except roll up their sleeves for their turn of course.

Or the vaccine causes you to suffocate because your lungs no longer work due to the squalene or mercury or any one or combination of the other poisons contained in the junk syringe...nothing your family can do...accept roll up their sleeves for their turn...then if they survive...maybe they can scrounge together the money to bury you...

Look up the facts.


I heard that this stuff, if taken, will work against your immune system in that because the immune system is usually good at being resistant to certain illness, this crap will make the immune system go nuts because it spreads everywhere and the immune system can't contain it.


you are right
its not actually the flu that kills you, it is the response from your immune system.
theres been study into this, and potential treatments.

"In other words, the reason swine flu is so dangerous is because it causes your immune system to go into overdrive. Marijuana, however, is a proven immune system suppressant which, in this case, may aid in survival."

Cannabinoids Vs. Swine flu

I suggest everyone reads about this possible treatment, as it COULD save your life. Do your own research on every topic, dont let decade old propaganda influence your decision on this.

[edit on 26-8-2009 by djpleiades]


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 10:02 AM by warrenb
reply to post by fleabit



I'm not sure what House you mean?

The bill has passed already in the Massachusetts Senate, so this means it is in effect in that state, at least that is my understanding.

Watch the video, the second guy in the news report says right at the beginning
"The senate passed this bill, bill 2028 today, they did so unanimously"


reply posted on 26-8-2009 @ 10:09 AM by redhead57
The thing that should alarm everyone is the fact that they are pushing for the vaccine to start being used mid September, BEFORE the testing and results can be completed.

I read an article yesterday about this and it was on ABC news last night and Charlie Gibson was not at all objective in his objection to this rush. Let me see if I can find the footage.

"We have assured both the profession and the public that the H1N1 vaccine will be evaluated with the same rigor that is applied to seasonal vaccine," he added. "We should not make vaccine available before the trials are complete and the results carefully assessed." Amir Afkhami, assistant professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and of Global Health at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., agreed. "I fear that a rush towards vaccinating the population without completing trials risks leading to the harmful outcome that we witnessed during the 1976 Swine flu scare where the government advocated rapid production and vaccination of the population without adequate safeguards which led to an unexplained increase in cases of Guillain Barre syndrome amongst other complications," Afkhami said. "I think in this regard we must learn from lessons of the past and be mindful of not jumping from the proverbial frying pan into the fire by putting people's health at risk without adequate production and safety monitoring of the vaccines."


abcnews.go.com...

There is NO WAY that I will be letting them stick me or anyone in my family, we are not guinea pigs, we are citizens with rights. Or at least we used to be.

This all makes me wonder if they know this is far more deadly than they are letting on or if this is just more govt. scare tactics. Sad thing is we won't really know for sure until it is too late.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^