More evidence for the Iran-Libya-Pakistan Connection (Which in my opinion is the actual and most probable scenario of what took place).
The German anti-terror campaign Operation Autumn Leaves (see J, O and P) led to the arrest of bomb-maker Marwan Khreesat weeks before the
Lockerbie disaster. Khreesat was released after a few days because of a lack of evidence. In April 1989 further German police raids resulted in the
discovery of two more bombs designed by Khreesat specifically to blow up aircraft. Did he make the bomb which was placed on feeder flight Pan Am 103A
before it left Frankfurt for Heathrow?
Not only that, but this:
Five weeks before the Palestinian warning (see I) was received, a German anti-terrorism campaign, Operation Autumn Leaves, arrested a "team of
Palestinians not associated with the PLO" in possession of a bomb in a cassette recorder (see T) strikingly similar to the Lockerbie bomb.
We can deduct from here, that either, A) These were the contacts from Megrahi or B) These were the Contacts for Megrahi's partner, Fhimah to have
met. This would have worked out perfectly, if Fhimah was their contact because Fhimah had the Pan Am Tags and access to the luggage. The question now
comes in, if this happened.... Who did it happen with? And how far does this rabbit hole really go.....
The CIA Connection
Alright a lot of people are going crazy: What about the CIA... ALRIGHT..lol.. I will talk about the CIA, calm down I only had a day to release what I
The theory of the CIA is that they were Smuggling Drugs. Which wouldn't be the first and probably is not the last:
Lockerbie farmer Jim Wilson found a suitcase full of cellophane packets containing white powder among the debris in his fields. The suitcase was
taken away, no explanation was given, and the authorities continued to insist that no drugs (apart from a small quantity of cannabis) had been found
on the plane. But it was later discovered that the name Mr Wilson saw on the suitcase did not correspond with any of the names on the Pan Am 103
If the above is true from the witness, than this definately does not CHANGE ANYTHING. People lets be serious here.
FACT: There was a bomb
FACT: You do not blow up your goods, so the CIA did not and would not destroy their smuggled goods.
So we can assume from the info above or if you rather; we can deduct from the above that the CIA did not indeed bomb their cargo. But their does come
an issue, if the CIA did not bomb the plane....who did? Well lets keep investigating the CIA connection.
On the night of the disaster teams of rescue volunteers scouring the area discovered a large object under a red tarpaulin. As they approached it,
they were warned off by gunmen in the doorway of a hovering helicopter. A local farmer, Innes Graham, was also warned by US investigators to stay away
from a small wooded area a few miles east of Lockerbie.
This makes one wonder what is going on? What was their. Well according from an official report:
Two coach-loads of officials arrived at the disaster scene in the day after the crash. Many were plain-clothed Americans with no obvious
affiliation. Among their baggage was a single coffin for which no explanation has ever been given. Labour MP Tam Dalyell later produced evidence
indicating that the Americans had "stolen" a body from the wreckage. A local doctor identified and labelled 59 bodies and was then puzzled to find
that the Americans had relabelled and tagged only 58 in the area where he had been working.
This makes things change a little bit and to me the obvious reason to a take a body would be due to drugs. Its not uncommon for drugs to be swallowed
or placed in...uncomfortable areas. Depeneding on the drug load this could have been different and a necessary part of the drug operation to smuggle
drugs through a live host. Of course the question comes into play who was he? I would guess CIA.
And this is where the Lockerbie Bomber and the CIA meet.... According to a private investiigating firm:
A report by Interfor, a New York corporate investigative company hired by Pan Am, suggested that a Palestinian gang (see P) had got the bomb on to
the airliner at Frankfurt by exploiting a US intelligence deal (see U). In a bid to free American hostages in Beirut, American intelligence agents had
apparently struck a deal with Syrian drug smugglers: in exchange for hostage information, the agents smoothed the Lebanon-US drugs route by relaxing
security restrictions and allowing drug luggage to sail through customs. The terrorist gang simply switched the drug luggage for a bomb.
Remember that break in that occured? From Frankfurt to Heathrow in the Heathrow baggage area at Frankfurt. That would make sense and that would BE THE
REASON why secruity was LAXED as stated in the OP's. Secruity was on high, but than all of a sudden relaxed? Why? Whats the link?
Operation Autumn Leaves led to the arrest of a gang associated with a splinter group of the Palestinian movement the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC). Was Pan Am 103 blown up by a Palestinian gang, protected by Syria and paid for by Iran?
Well, Iran would have not acted alone and its closest ally at the time can be argued to be Libya. Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifa
Fhimah definately bought the shirts, Fhimah receieved the the bomb from the "team of Palestinians not associated with the PLO" after he was
released, Fhimah returns and gives the bomb to Megrahi, Megrahi fixes the suitcase and gives it to his intelligence community, whoever, thsi middleman
was could have been or gave the important cargo to Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine gang. They in turn with the Pan Am Tags given by
Fhimah loaded the luggage on at Frankfurt/Heathrow when secruity was laxed. Too good of a coincidence?
Could this had been all true? The CIA's Drugs and The Terrorist? Was it a CIA Deal gone horribly bad? It would appear if you believe the conspiracy
theory above. To me it makes sense and it is highly plausible and definately weighs on my mind as the next best scenario...
Now to connection everything and make things easier to understand:
-In July 1988 the USS Vincennes shot down an Iranian airliner over the Persian Gulf, killing all 290 people on board. The US stated that it thought it
was a fighter plane. The Iranian head stated that their would be revenge and that blood would reign from the sky.
-The Iranians hired a Palestinian terrorist group, the PFLP-GC (known to have connections with CIA drug-smuggling operations), to exact revenge. In
this case the Libyans were also involved, with having close connections to Iran and Palestinian terrorist groups.
-In December 1988 operatives of the PFLP-GC managed to replace one of the suitcases containing CIA heroin or coc aine, and destined to be
transported on Pan Am Flight 103 to the U.S., with a suitcase containing a bomb. The contacts for the PFLP must have been Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed
al-Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, their is no way around it. They had a part in this and I stand by my scenario above, Fhimah recieved the
luggage and tagged it with the Pan Am tags while Megrahi used his clothes and wrapped everything uo in his clothes (By eveyrthing I mean the bomb).
-CIA operatives placed this suitcase on the Pan Am plane as part of the CIA's normal drug-smuggling operations. But it probably was not that easy so
a break in must have been simulated because the secruity was so relaxed.
-The bomb exploded over Lockerbie, killing 189 Americans. The Iranians got their revenge.
-The U.S., anxious to conceal the role played by the CIA (Working with the enemy for Drugs, yea, how would you explain that to the people..lol),
blamed Libya, imposed crippling economic sanctions in an effort to force Libya to "admit" guilt, and persuaded the U.N. to do the same. Which it did
not work, but the evidence discovered later would prove a connection between everyone!
-After years of economic hardship Libya decided it was better to pay billions of dollars and formally admit guilt in order to have the sanctions
lifted. They stated a fact they were guilty on some level.
-Only two guilty suspects were known and only one faced time, but was released just a few days ago... is that justice? Did the people on that plane
have a choice?...Makes one wonder....
Perhaps the most compelling evidence:
An Israeli intercept of Iranian diplomatic coded communications between Mohtashemi's Interior Ministry in Teheran and the Iranian embassy in
Beirut (where Mohtashemi once served as ambassador) revealed more than two years before Buehler was arrested by Iran that the Shi-ite cleric
transferred $1.2 to $2 million used for the bombing of PanAm 103 to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command headed by Ahmed
To me it makes sense, the CIA and the Trouble. The Palestine-Libya-Iran connection seems TO REAL to ignore anymore. But thats the CIA's involvement
in a nut shell according to TheMythlives.