It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
I wouldn't say they're "failing to deliver" at all!
Maryland, Virginia Company Buys 400 MW Free Energy Generator From BlackLight Power Inc.
They have already had the technology peer-reviewed and replicated by Rowan University, and they are already licensing it out to third-party energy companies - Akridge Energy being #6!
IMHO this is huge news and should rightfully be all over the MSM, but instead - massive silence. Big surprise
So it's left to folks like us to spread this around........
Good thread OP
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by rnaa
So?
Just because this Akridge Energy doesn't have much of a web presence, does not mean they don't exist
Originally posted by rnaa
I'm just saying that this deal isn't a public utility company putting its reputation on the line here. Akridge doesn't have to answer to its shareholders or customers if it is wasting its money on vaporware. Especially since John Akridge is also a shareholder in Blacklight.
There is nothing wrong with Akridge Energy not having a web presence, nor the Developer using a wholly owned subsidiary to do its electrical contracting.
This deal just isn't really much of a credibility break-through like the press release implies, that's all.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
I read a large portion of their technical paper and I don't think what they propose is possible.
If there is the "true ground state" of the hydrogen atom (which does not exist, because if you believe in quantum mechanics at all, there is no such solution to the equation), then there is always a finite probability of a transition from states with higher energy, even if it's a small one. Given the abundance of hydrogen on our planet and in the Universe, it's inconceivable that spectral analysis wouldn't reveal even trace amounts of the proposed substance.
The math they present does look scientific, but I find the solution highly suspect.
I personally have no doubt that the whole thing is a relatively sophisticated fraud.
Originally posted by zarp3333
On the one hand, its been well over a century since we've harnessed internal combustion and a half a century since nuclear energy, it stands to reason that we would have seen some kind of break through by now given the advances in other sciences.
On the other hand, I've seen my hopes dashed over and over with dubious, inventions and purposefully hidden technology. Has anyone ever heard of the Massive Yet Tiny Engine? I think I read about it on ATS a couple years ago.
The technology is based on internal combustion but the efficiency was 3 times that of typical engines. Heres a link.
www.angellabsllc.com...