It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Maxmars
If the scenario plays out as we are prone to fear it will. What will the media and the clergy be doing?
Telling us about how we must render unto Ceasar that which is his, and showing us pictures of heroic troops herding people into 'special locations' where their safety can be assured?
Originally posted by tyranny22
reply to post by hotrodturbo7
The other point I raised was that the REX 84 Camps has been implimented for 20+ years and have never been used. I've heard little from anyone regarding this subject. If 400,000 troops were deployed to "Help" people, these are the camps they'd most likely be "helping" them to.
Thank you bringing this to everyone's attention. I agree, we have been under martial law at a minimum since sept 14, 2001.
It's not going to be any kind of black/white, good guy vs bad guy situation either. They will use mercs like Blackwater and dress them up as National Guard, Police, Army, etc and use them as a 5th column.
Reports will come in of National guard firing on Army, Militia shooting at police - you see where I'm going? They will maximize confusion so no-one will know who the real bad guys are.
America won't be all that hard to take down because we have the most centralized systems of distribution and communication of any nation. We do not have the necessary resources in any particular area to sustain it without importing fuel, food, medicine etc, from other areas.
They can and ;probably will take us down section by section and leave each one to starve that they have taken over.
When they are ready to move communications and power will go down and key resistance figures will disappear.
Just my projections on the subject.
Originally posted by googolplex
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
reply to post by Maxmars
One thing to bear in mind, is any armed conflict with the American people would FAIL as fast as it started. How many of the armed forces would fire on the civiilian population and if the population used their own arms, what would happen. It would be no contest.
They are making the soldiers sign oaths to shoot American citizens if need be, and a gun is one thing but if you go up against a Tank you had better be Bin Laden, or as smart.
In asking some soldiers if would shoot citizen, OH! Hell Yea!
Originally posted by romanmel
Originally posted by googolplex
ALL of this stuff about States and governors won't mean anything when FEMA steps in and turns on REX84.
The Constitution will be totally out the window as will any State control over anything, orders will all come down from Federal Government thru FEMA.
I read to whole shmeal they can take your food, water, property, as they wish.
Then they have the FEMA camps, and I saw the FEAM coffins they will accommodate at least 3 or 4 and won't have to worry pallbearers, except for one named forklift.
Now Hear This... America has been canceled, due to lack of interest.
Have a nice day!
Originally posted by Evisscerator
reply to post by burntheships
Just consider that if these troops are authorized, and the World Health Organization declares a level 6 pandemic in the US, they would take over the US Government and use the troops to force vaccinations upon everyone.
All the bailouts under President George Bush and President Barack Obama have been implemented under the guise of preventing national or worldwide collapse. Crisis has historically been the justification for governments to seize more power and control over individual liberties. We have seen the government use a crisis to promote economic, political and social upheavals in order to impose their agenda. We have already seen the federal government take a controlling share in many financial institutions.
Are we as citizens being hammered day in day out with continual crisis for a reason? Should we accept it as status quo?
Or is it a subversive movement taking full advantage of decades of manipulation on the part of the powers that be to achieve a desired goal?
Governors from both parties have expressed opposition to the Department of Defense becoming involved in responses to domestic disasters. The Pentagon wants the Secretary of Defense to have the authority to command National Guard and U.S. military units that are dispatched to help with natural or man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism. This change would conflict with current law that gives governors the authority to command any Guard or military units operating in their states to assist with disasters or attacks.
Vermont Governor Jim Douglas (R), chairman of the National Governors Association, and Governor Joe Manchin (D) of West Virginia, NGA’s vice chairman, told the Pentagon in a letter, “We are concerned that the legislative proposal you discuss in your letter would invite confusion on critical command and control issues, complicate interagency planning, establish stove-piped response efforts, and interfere with governors’ constitutional responsibilities to ensure the safety and security of their citizens.”
Douglas and Manchin reminded Defense Department officials of the lessons learned from Sept. 11 and Hurricane Katrina about the need for having “clear chains of command to avoid duplication of effort and to ensure the most effective use of response resources.”
Originally posted by OnTheFelt
Originally posted by sanchoearlyjones
Star, and flag.
Funny they've been doing this for some time. Just on a small test scale.
The thing I'd see as being very deviant is We in the USA don't have 400k soldiers to spare.
So, to myself, this looks like the implementation of UN troops. I'm totally serious for a long time I've learned the phonetics for hello, yes, no in a couple other languages.
People really need to wake up; our government has been hyjacked, and we are looking at what amounts to a rogue piracy.
Agreed! And why do you think they want to use foreign UN troops....I'll tell you, do you think Fran from Germany really gives a rat's a s s about putting a bullet through Joe American Schmoe? Hell no he doesn't.
It sure conveniently drops the moral factor when you think about it.