It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hotrodturbo7
Originally posted by rnaa
So OK, putting your fear mongering aside, lets suppose this is a plan for deploying troops in reaction to a national or natural disaster. Wouldn't you expect the Pentagon to canvas the possible need for this? Wouldn't you be righteously p1ssed off if there wasn't a plan to deal with the results of, say, North Korea smuggling a nuke into San Fransisco harbor and setting it off? I know I would.
While your example would definitely be a disaster, wouldn't that be better characterized as an "act of war", and not a "disaster"?
Originally posted by googolplex
ALL of this stuff about States and governors won't mean anything when FEMA steps in and turns on REX84.
The Constitution will be totally out the window as will any State control over anything, orders will all come down from Federal Government thru FEMA.
I read to whole shmeal they can take your food, water, property, as they wish.
Then they have the FEMA camps, and I saw the FEAM coffins they will accommodate at least 3 or 4 and won't have to worry pallbearers, except for one named forklift.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Have all the Governor's of the land been under-staffing the security of their citizens all this time? Do we really need troops with assault weapons and combat gear to 'help' those in need?
Originally posted by burntheships
And did any one else notice googles logo? What the heck is that...it is a timer of sorts...with a nail twisted into it, and wire? Hello?
Originally posted by PRS395
On Coast To Coast AM with George Noory, they are talking about this subject RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please tune in and tell everyone!