It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife
AND, this is different from the FOR-PROFIT Health Insurance Companies denying needed medical care and dropping patients rather than paying claims.....this is different how, again???
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife
AND, this is different from the FOR-PROFIT Health Insurance Companies denying needed medical care and dropping patients rather than paying claims.....this is different how, again???
...the fact that the Health and Human Services Secretary will appoint a panel...
THIS is the very same sort of fear-mongering junk that was uttered by Fmr Gov. Palin last Friday, because it smacks as an almost exact copy of her (false) claims of a Gov't "death panel".
That sort of shameless rhetoric, from a person who just a few months ago was outraged by a comedian's joke about (what he thought was) her adult daughter, yet this same woman has no qualms about using her infant son as a prop in this political charade???
ALL of the BS coming down the pike about the "perils" of a Health Care Bill is fostered by ---[drumroll, please]---the INSURANCE COMPANIES!!!
The same insurance companies that saw their corporate profits nearly quintuple!!! between years 2000 and 2007...(Hmmmm, who was President then???) and average Insurance Company CEO compensation?? $11.9 MILLION. Per year.
Remember those old TV commercials for Gravy Train dog food?? Well, if you don't, I sure 'betcha' these guys do!!!
_______________
This is straight from the house bill, not from Palin, or any other "Side of the aisle." A lot of you would rather paint all conservatives and republicans with the same wide brush. Just because you had 8 years of government you didn't agree with, doesn't mean we should spend another 4 with more government we don't agree with. If in 2004 there would have been a better candidate on either side besides Fmr. President Bush, I would have voted for them. But I disagree with your views on this health care reform. Our health care is the best in the world. This bill in it's present form will cripple not only health care, but capitalism as as we know it. I am an independent, that votes for the best candidate, the best American for the job. Not a party line.
So, before you immediately paint something republican fear mongering, or any other thing, read the bill. Before you besmirch the posters, read the bill so you know what their talking about. All I have seen on the democratic side led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid is saying "Republicans bad! Democrats good!" Nancy says people were bringing swastikas. Where was the news report on that? CNN, MSNBC, all the news would have been all over that. Now mysteriously a swastika is painted on a Georgia congressmans office.
There was corruption on the republican side when Bush was in Office, now there is even more in my opinion in this administration. I am not calling names, or deflecting the questions on to Palin. I think she's an idiot too, but she made alot of people do one thing that Nancy Pelosi did not. She made a lot of people read the bill, when they did, that is when they started flooding the town hall meetings.
I never saw any uprisings on the level they are at during the bush administration. I think CNN and the left leaning media would have been all over that.
Originally posted by andrewh7
You can't condemn the government option by criticizing things that are currently done by private insurers routinely. That would be absurd.
Originally posted by HighgroundIs it really that absurd to want the change promised by Obama?
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Wow... not like I needed this to realize that Palin never speaks truth, let alone truth to power.
But when you read the truth-o-meter, it's amazing how much FALSE rumors are being circulated.
As I sit here and watch the loonies on TV at these town halls (yep loonies... some are downright throwing tantrums), I'm amazed at how much of the American public, and ATSers are consistently duped by fear.
It's almost as if thats the biggest weakness America has.. it's fear.
Check out the truth-o-meter. It's a great dose of fresh air, amidst the aroma from the scat that exists right now.
www.politifact.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by HighgroundIs it really that absurd to want the change promised by Obama?
"wanting the change", that is the problem, its all airy fairy, the specifics are rather different- I could want it to rain chocolate but I have to live in the real world- unfortunately many of Obama's supporters seemed to have suspended all notions of reality
*remembers classic youtube vid of woman saying she would not have to pay her mortgage once the chosen one got elected*
Originally posted by damwel
Bush took care of the vets? I really think you need to go back and look at that one. One of the sharpest arrows of the left was pointing out how bad the va hospitals were and the cutting of funding for vet affairs. I really can't say it's any better now because frankly I don't know that but I do know that Bush didn't take care of the vets any better than he took care of the soldiers by forcing them to remove armor from old vehicles in order to protect themselves. (remember that one? when Rumsfeld threatened soldiers with charges)
Originally posted by weedwhacker
WHAT ARE THE GOP so afraid of????
THAT is the question you should be asking, and the "conspiracy" you should be looking for.
Originally posted by HighgroundGood for you, but that has nothing to do with the issue. He was remarking that it's absurd to ask the government to do anything different from the private sector, and I'm stating that's exactly what Obama promised to do. Is it so absurd to want to hold a candidate to their campaign promises?
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by weedwhacker
Yep... it's pretty much the Insurance companies who have the most to gain from stopping the health care bill.
Starred!
Originally posted by blueorder
Well you were talkin about wanting the "change" Obama promised, but that was part of the problem, loads of talk of change, loads of pr, but not great on specifics (a quick glance at his record as a man/politician would have shown the lack of reason to believe in any great notion of "change")
Originally posted by Highground
Obama never intended to change anything, that's painfully obvious, however, his supporters wanted change, and he tries to claim he is pushing change. Because of this, the disillusionment will start when people start pointing out there is no change in anything he is doing. His campaign promises were lies, and nothing more.
.
Originally posted by kernalpanic
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Hastobemoretolife
AND, this is different from the FOR-PROFIT Health Insurance Companies denying needed medical care and dropping patients rather than paying claims.....this is different how, again???
Its actually quite simple really, if an insurance company has a tendency to do that, actions can be taken to move to a new insurer. Activism on the part of people who point these things out can force insurers to change their ways, or be forced out of business as people are made aware of what they are doing and dump their policy with them. Remember...vote with your wallet.
Now if this is a government panel, where are you going to move to? Will they exempt themselves from lawsuit like they do for the Pharma companies and their vaccines? This option is unamerican. Plain and simple. So while Palin is using wordsmith tactics, she doesn't appear to be as dumb or clueless as you try to convince yourselves. I personally am on the Ron Paul train, but this snipping between party lines seems to me to be nothing more then a bunch of dopes still buying into the left-right paradigm to oblivion. Sarah Palin wouldn't be my first choice, but she is undeserving of this 'pile on' in this instance.
Insurance companies try to discourage people from waiting until they get sick in order to purchase health insurance. One way in which they do this is to impose pre-existing condition exclusion periods. This means that if you have a medical problem which exists at the time you enroll in or purchase your health insurance, the insurance company will deny all claims pertaining to this medical problem for a certain period of time.