It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jd140
Nope he is guilty regardless of why he modified his consoles. He could have modified it just to see if he could do it and be guilty.
This is coverd under The Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Here is what gets him fined or jail time. en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by jd140
Probably easier to just put the game back into the case then it is to modify multiple consoles to play back ups.
Thats a good excuse, but not very likely.
Originally posted by jd140
Off my back buddy, I said it was a good excuse but not very likely.
You pretty much said the same thing.
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by Darthorious
Good find.
I think paragraph 2 still makes it unlawful to provide services to modify the consoles. So if it is proven that he modified someone elses console then he still can be found guilty.
Keep in mind that I am not a lawyer and my interpetation could be extremely off base.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
I wonder if they can sue me for modifying my console with a hammer?
The irony of this is that it was the chipping of the PS1 that helped Sony dominate the market and sell so many units. It can be argued that illegal mods were the major selling point of the console.
IRM
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by Darthorious
Either way, he did something to catch someones attention and he got arrested. I'm sure we will find out what it was that he did.
He might have to pay a hefty price to since they found a few differant consoles in his house.