There is a common theme that seems to have been developed. Same posters and same ideologies perpetually spewing the same nonsense in different forms.
Their opinions are not based on objective thought processes, but the same political babel their FOX news and Rush Limbaugh rhetoric gods spew at
them.
While it is common the President will make appointments according to his party lines, people with extreme ideologies (such as the OP is with the
extreme right) act like this is some wild out of the ordinary action. It is common practice in every new administartion, and it is well understood
that it will happen.
The difference in rhetoric is the extremism that is plainly apparent in OPs such as this one. They wish to highlight pieces of the puzzle to fit
their agenda. As well placed criticism is good for any objective thinking individual to help mold rational views of the political world that
envelopes us all most of these types of thread move well pass healthy forms of criticism.
For example. The OPs opinion:
The Obama administration is letting him.
'Worship' ... or plot further jihad?
'Correspondence' ... or plot further jihad?
It's a safe bet that it's 'plot further jihad'
So, in essence the OP is alluding to the fact she thinks Obama is letting terrorists plan terrorism in our own prisons or "plot Jihad". Therefore
making Obama complicit in any future terrorist acts against the U.S.
In this new form of extremism people believe none of these individuals who have been taken into custody deserve a fair trial to determine there guilt
or innocence.
This is mind boggling and a new form of political ideological extremism that is unparalleled. It is well beyond what any of us
have ever been taught and is beyond unacceptable. It has been drilled into some peoples head that justice can only be brought by the barrel of a
M-16. Traditional means of bringing a criminal to justice is no longer sufficient and anyone seeking to do harm to the U.S. must be dealt with by
torture, mass bombings and secret prisons. Court rooms, judges and
Habeas Corpus seem to be a thing of the past in some of these extreme
individuals minds.
This kind of thinking is rampant in the South and South East where they are very susceptable to the neo- conservative views because of a long standing
tradition of following the GOP and their honorable traditions of state rights. While this sort of extremism is not isolated to the right it has been
taken in and accepted within communities that inherintly are evangelical. Thus creating the Obama is the antiChrist rhetoric and therefore must be
something other than Christian and not worth the position that has been granted to him by the American people. And since he could be the anti-Christ
he must be Muslim or anything other than Christian again making him an inferior leader. The author of this thread has stated such things herself in
other threads.
This style of political pandering is mainly conjured up by opposing political parties, and their pawns (such as Fox news and their constituents for
the right and MSNBC and their constituents for the left ) used as whipping boys to spread the 'good news' to the rest of the troops.
This thread is a great example of this effect.
Having people, ideas and organizations in opposition to the current party that holds power is of the utmost importance for any country striving for a
balance in government, but the hate that has been generated by some is so overwhelming that it has begun to seep its way into average peoples mind
that dont have a good grasp on the political history and makeup of the United States.
It is dangerous, and more people need to stand up against such extremisms.