It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pieman
we know that where we add something to the environment the results are unpredictable at best.
what is being suggested is that we screw around with a complex system we don't fully understand in order to fix a problem we shouldn't be causing in the first place.
fixing an imbalance we caused by creating an imbalance elsewhere seems like a stupid idea to me, it's that kind of idea that caused all the issues in the first place.
what we actually need to do is take some responsibility for own own actions, not something that is hugely popular with the childish mind but something that people will have to understand eventually.
Originally posted by badgerprints
The problem is that the damage is done. If we can actually fix it instead of using the situation to control people and their money by forcing huge expenditures on "carbon reduction" ,which we know won't happen successrfully, then why not actually find a solution?
The oceans are already in a poor state because of overfishing and trillions of tons of crap that has been pumped into them by man. If man finds something that will actually repair some of the damage, how is it a "stupid idea" as you so succinctly put it?
Originally posted by SwatMedic
I'd like to see some laboratory testing and data before we let this guy start filling up the oceans with iron.
Test in a lab, if that goes well, test in the field on a very small scale.
Then show us all with the data that this indeed does work.
Then his bandwagon will fill.
Originally posted by pieman
fixing an imbalance we caused by creating an imbalance elsewhere seems like a stupid idea to me, it's that kind of idea that caused all the issues in the first place.
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Ok, we got ridd of ALL the co2 in the world, what happens ??
Let us say there are NO co2 at all any where, would the world stop changing ?
Originally posted by Dramey
reply to post by observe50
i agree with you we need to stop using fossil fuels
i dont think it will have much of a impact on our climate as history has proven earth goes through its extremes of climates whether we're on earth or not
but i do know we will run out of fossil fuels
and its stupid to continue down that path without moving faster to implement alternatives
especially when knowledge of several alternative are already out there
like hemp
Originally posted by observe50
I am not a scientist so I don't known the correct termonolgy would it be oygenate or re-oxygenate the water.