I'll say this again as Iv said before. President Obama provided sufficient evidence vai the constitution to be eligible for the presidency. The
constitution clearly states that the question of eligibility ends up in the hands of congress and the electoral college:
The constitution clearly states:
According to the court, the Constitution vests Congress -- no individual voters, or even opposing candidates -- with the final authority re: the
qualifications of the Presidency.:
Article II prescribes that each state shall appoint, in the manner directed by the state’s legislature, the number of presidential electors to which
it is constitutionally entitled. The Twelfth Amendment prescribes the manner in which the electors appointed by the states shall in turn elect the
president:
“[t]he electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President . . . and they shall . . . transmit
[their votes] sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; — The President of the Senate
shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.”
www.law.cornell.edu...
In December 2008 congress official confirmed Obamas eligibility for president as did the electoral college following his democratic win on November
4th 2008. His eligibility has also been accepted by the state of Hawaii and by the Hawaiian health department who personally verified his
short
form birth certificate.
No where in the constitution does it state he has to show his
long form birth certificate, as if anybody here can account for every other
president of the 44 having to show theirs.
The laws and constitutional references cited so far against Obamas eligibility have been
debunked thus far. Any evidence presented have either
not been sufficient in proving his ineligibility or they have been unauthenticated.
Until the birthers and the rest of the fringe come up with credible evidence proving Obama's eligibility they will get no where with their lawsuits.
Simply creating more "questions" and asking "why he doesnt show it" will not get you a case
under the court of law.
Now until Mrs. Taitz and her fellow birthers come out with the evidence to back up heir claims, they are going to be dead in the water. If they feel
they have something, by all means present it to the courts. If there was solid evidence proving Obama to be ineligible I would personally want that
evidence to be presented by to the courts, but thus far all Iv seen are "personal suspicions" "speculative conclusions" and a blatant misuse of
referencing the law and the constitution.
SG