It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...why is the sun reflecting on the lander in the opposite direction that the sun is shining on the terrain?
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by kiwifoot
I thought this probe was looking to scout possible landing sites for manned missions in 2020/ Wouldn't they have the ability to take better images (more close up and detailed).
Sorry NASA, this proves nothing to me.
In short, no. The maximum res of LRO is about half a meter per pixel (these images are roughly 1.5m/pixel due to altitude at the time they were taken). That's good enough to determine if a potential landing site has dangerous boulders in the way or not. I'm sorry if that doesn't prove anything to you, but i don't see how else you can explain the astronauts' footprints or these descent stages.
[edit on 17-7-2009 by ngchunter]
Originally posted by ngchunter
LRO has imaged at least one of the Apollo landing sites now (and it sounds like there were able to get more than one), and NASA is releasing the images at noon today:
www.nasa.gov...
This is the first time since the end of the Apollo program that images have been taken that resolve some of the actual hardware left behind. Depending on the probe's altitude at the time the images were taken, these may or may not be as good as LRO can ultimately provide.
*There's a press conference to discuss the images at 2pm eastern, but I suspect the images will go up on the LROC site when they're released to the media at 12:
lroc.sese.asu.edu...
[edit on 17-7-2009 by ngchunter]
Originally posted by Solar.Absolution
Yeah I don't think I'd believe anything NASA has to say on the subject.. What has always bothered me is.. They had the technology for live uninterrupted footage of the moon landing in the 60's ? Me thinks not!
...some of the most powerful earth-bound telescopes can achieve this sort of detail from 250,000 miles away...
First, the 13,000 "missing" Apollo tapes that were supposedly just found in Australia have reportedly been erased and now this?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by dampnickers
Then there should be photographs from said telescopes, no?
Where are they? It's been 40 years.
NASA doesn't have the DoD budget to include the sort of optics used in 'spy satellites' that image the Earth. The LRO is built to image at a certain resolution deemed sufficient for its stated mission. Taking photos of Apollo hardware is just to try to shut up the 'hoax' believers.
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by kiwifoot
reply to post by ngchunter
Mate you should upload the NASA to your ATS album, then put them in the OP!
Let everyone decide themselves.
While that's not the worst idea, I would prefer people click the link i provided above:
wms.lroc.asu.edu...
The reason being, the original source files are huge, gigabyte size files. If you want to seriously inspect the new images, you need to get the originals, not compressed web-based images like JPGs, and not cropped images like the NASA media site.
Originally posted by dampnickers
they can use said telescopes to release photos of far off galaxies in amazing detail. Even boast about how they can make out objects on nearby planets... so ask yourself why they don't release the photos.
Well, they can use said telescopes to release photos of far off galaxies in amazing detail.
Even boast about how they can make out objects on nearby planets...
What really annoys me is that you have come here seeking to deny ignorance.
If NASA are so ingenuous why don't they release all photos of the moon missions?
Why do Malin Space Science Systems get first dibs on most of the photos taken by NASA missions, and why do MSSS get to dictate which photos NASA can release?
Originally posted by dampnickers
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by dampnickers
Then there should be photographs from said telescopes, no?
Where are they? It's been 40 years.
NASA doesn't have the DoD budget to include the sort of optics used in 'spy satellites' that image the Earth. The LRO is built to image at a certain resolution deemed sufficient for its stated mission. Taking photos of Apollo hardware is just to try to shut up the 'hoax' believers.
Well, they can use said telescopes to release photos of far off galaxies in amazing detail. Even boast about how they can make out objects on nearby planets... so ask yourself why they don't release the photos.