It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by debunky
GPS on the moon? You know you need at least one satellite and one ground station for GPS right?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by TurkeyBurgers I mean Technically couldn't you build a house of cards on the moon and since there is no atmosphere it would not get blown over?
NASA says...
December 7, 2005: Every lunar morning, when the sun first peeks over the dusty soil of the moon after two weeks of frigid lunar night, a strange storm stirs the surface.
The next time you see the moon, trace your finger along the terminator, the dividing line between lunar night and day. That's where the storm is. It's a long and skinny dust storm, stretching all the way from the north pole to the south pole, swirling across the surface, following the terminator as sunrise ceaselessly sweeps around the moon.
Moon Storms
science.nasa.gov...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by obilesk
So, if we took the Ikonos and sent it to the moon, we could get great pics?
Yes. Of rocks, craters, escarpments....it'd be like spending enormous sums of money and energy to photograph, in great detail, the Sahara Desert.
Drawn by differences in global charge accumulation, floating dust would naturally fly from the strongly-negative nightside to the weakly-negative dayside. This "dust storm" effect would be strongest at the Moon's terminator, the dividing line between day and night.
Originally posted by Phage
The "dust storms" are not caused by wind but probably by electrostatic forces.
"The Moon seems to have a tenuous atmosphere of moving dust particles," Stubbs explains. "We use the word 'fountain' to evoke the idea of a drinking fountain: the arc of water coming out of the spout looks static, but we know the water molecules are in motion." In the same way, individual bits of moondust are constantly leaping up from and falling back to the Moon's surface, giving rise to a "dust atmosphere" that looks static but is composed of dust particles in constant motion.
Would these craters have a strong surplus of negative charge? Astronauts need to know, because in the years ahead NASA plans to send people back to the Moon, and deep dark craters are places where they might find pockets of frozen water--a crucial resource for any colony. Will they also encounter swarms of electric dust?
It's not science fiction any more.
Astronauts may have seen the storms, too. While orbiting the Moon, the crews of Apollo 8, 10, 12, and 17 sketched "bands" or "twilight rays" where sunlight was apparently filtering through dust above the moon's surface. This happened before each lunar sunrise and just after each lunar sunset. NASA's Surveyor spacecraft also photographed twilight "horizon glows," much like what the astronauts saw.
June 5, 2007: Picture this: A spaceship swoops in from the void, plunging toward a cloudy planet about the size of Earth. A laser beam lances out from the ship; it probes the planet's clouds, striving to reach the hidden surface below. Meanwhile, back on the craft's home world, scientists perch on the edge of their seats waiting to see what happens.
Sounds like science fiction? This is real, and it's happening today.
Originally posted by obilesk
I don't pretend to be fully knowledgeable about what they use, but when I hear the shuttle and our satellites and even the Mars Rovers use equipment less advanced than I can get at Newegg.com, it just baffles me.
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Would the stuff you can get from newegg.com work on Mars or the moon?
Weren't those images visible only from space and not on the Moon itself?
Originally posted by zorgon
And why did not ONE of those astronauts not point his chest camera at those rays? Seems to me would have made a spectacular image from another world, considering how good they were at precise framing
Originally posted by debunky
GPS on the moon? You know you need at least one satellite and one ground station for GPS right?
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Would the stuff you can get from newegg.com work on Mars or the moon? Would it survive the trip and be able to send back images to earth? I don't think it's so much "less advanced" as a whole different level of technology.
Originally posted by ArMaP
The equipment is not less advanced, it has to be much more hardened than what we can buy in the stores, and they have to control all things that may change the working of the camera.
Mars Express, for example, includes in the information sent about the photos the temperature of the camera and the temperature of the lens, both things change the way the camera work, so they must be taken into account to adjust the resulting image to the conditions in which the photo was taken.
Originally posted by zorgon
Most likely, yes.. after all if seventh grader science project work out in space...
www.hightechscience.org...
Originally posted by ArMaPWeren't those images visible only from space and not on the Moon itself?
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Really, would off the shelf components survive and work on Mars?
Lunar Orbiter 3 high resolution image of the Surveyor 1 spacecraft and landing site. This image shows the area within the Flamsteed ring in Oceanus Procellarum on the moon. The spacecraft is the bright spot at the center of the red circle. The shadow of the 1 meter wide solar panels can also be seen. The width of the framelets (the spacing between the horizontal lines on the image) is about 220 meters. (Lunar Orbiter 3, frame 194-H3)
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by zorgon
Most likely, yes.. after all if seventh grader science project work out in space...
www.hightechscience.org...
Cute. But didn't the 7th graders design their project to go into space? Would it have worked with something off the shelf?
Really, would off the shelf components survive and work on Mars?
Originally posted by jfj123
No.
Simple answer is NO.