US Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III say 911 is build on lies, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 09:14 AM by Hazelnut
reply to post by accuroman



I found some more interesting info on Stubblebine. Please read the article as it explains well-funded criminals attacking Natural News and Natural Solutions Foundation operated by Dr. Rima Labow and Maj. Gen. Stubblebine. The article reveals details of distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) website attacks, database hacking attempts, personal and professional reputation internet smear campaigns and impersonation attempts, among other tactics.


The Natural Solutions Foundation attends numerous Codex meetings, lobbies for health and health freedom and reports on them extensively. Her articles, interviews, blogs and emails are widely read by natural health advocates and supporters around the world.

Neither Dr. Laibow nor General Stubblebine receives any salaries or royalties from their health advocacy work or the sales generated by their virtual store, Organics4U, at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org/store


Dr. Laibow and General Stubblebine briefed the President of India in an extended private session, was the featured speaker at an Indian government meeting for an organization representing 950,000 Indian farmers, addressed the assembled Health Ministers of eastern, southern and central African nations and has met with dozens of decision makers in their own countries in Asia and Africa.

I've read that these two are disinfo agents regarding Codex Alimentarius. they claim to be on our side against Codex so I'm confused about these two people and their claims.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 10:36 AM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by titorite



A window specially designed to withstand an explosion......or did you not know that those were the types of windows installed there?


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 11:41 AM by titorite
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to
post by titorite



A window specially designed to withstand an explosion......or did you not know that those were the types of windows installed there?


I would ask if your joking but I know your not. Sooooo all those other windows where less than explosion proof? It does not matter here because I was more interested in the kinetic force the impact. The photo showed the window two feet from the wing tip. A plane traveling at 500 miles per hour and that window and the one above it survive...?

I could see some of those windows surviving an explosion. But not an impact at 500+miles an hour two feet from it.


reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 03:23 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by dino1989



Nope. Just one picture, found in less than a minute searching that shows the right wing impact area at the Pentagon.



reply posted on 2-7-2009 @ 03:26 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by titorite





Sooooo all those other windows where less than explosion proof? It does not matter here because I was more interested in the kinetic force the impact. The photo showed the window two feet from the wing tip. A plane traveling at 500 miles per hour and that window and the one above it survive...?


And if you look at it, the window did not survive unscathed. In addition, the design of the building shields the window from a direct impact.


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 10:37 AM by Nathan9197
www.youtube.com...

Sorry if this has already been posted. It backs up Major General Stubblebine' theory. The video shows the lack of fire damage from a 'Jet full of fuel.' and ofcourse the lack of damage from the 757's wings (which also, is where most of the fuel is stored in an airliner) on the building. The Building Damage shares No resemblance to the World Trade Center.

Nathan


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 12:41 PM by jprophet420
reply to post by CameronFox



You seem to only use character assassination for debunking.

Just wondering if you had any science behind what you are saying. After all the guy was head of army intelligence for 3 years. I think maybe that snubs chief armchair debunker and you have a little bit of hombre verdi.


reply posted on 7-7-2009 @ 08:11 PM by SPreston
reply to post by trebor451



Except they do not load them full do they? Just enough to reach their destination plus a little insurance.

And they burn fuel too don't they?

Distance from Dulles to LAX is 2,294 statute miles.
Maximum fuel load 757-200 is 3110 statute miles.
And auxiliary belly tanks go in the center tank.

So they fill the wing tanks first and they fill the belly tanks less and they burn the fuel out of the center tank first. So you are wrong again trebor.

The wing tanks would hold more fuel if Flight 77 was the actual plane which took off from Dulles and if Flight 77 was the actual plane which flew to Ohio and if Flight 77 was the actual plane which flew to the Pentagon.

But we all know that the actual plane which flew Over the Naval Annex was NOT Flight 77 don't we trebor?


reply posted on 9-7-2009 @ 02:22 AM by Seventh
There are several high ranking officials whom question the OS.....

41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans
Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 by Alan Miller.

Source....

patriotsquestion911.com...

It`s not exactly rocket science picking out the fundamentally flawed evidence on offer from that fateful day. Four planes bending the laws of physics as two managed to bring down 3 buildings, another penetrated several metres of reinforced concrete, whilst another managed to completely bury itself.

Fireman openly stating that it would take two lines to contain the fires, that somehow managed to generate enough heat to weaken tempered steel, and ofc damage tower 7 enough to make it collapse.

The *Bin Laden* video showing him (amongst other errors) writing with the incorrect hand.

Irregular stock market activities.

Traces of Thermite.

None OS conforming eye witness accounts, that differ immensely from the heavily media censured selective ones, painting a completely different picture on what happened to the twin towers, including explosions and missiles.

NIST`s denial of molten steel and free fall collapse back tracking, to name but two of their heavily contradictive detailed report.

Hostages managing to keep connected to their respective loved ones, for 20 minutes plus on mobile phones whilst flying in excess of 9000 feet, a feat deemed nigh on impossible at the time by mobile phone experts.

One of, if not the most heavily secure via CCTV`s security buildings in the whole world, and yet not one of the many videos confiscated by the FBI show a plane hitting the Pentagon.

Gross incompetence from National Security if we are to believe the OS.

Buildings designed and constructed to withstand fully loaded planes hitting them, if again, we are to believe the OS, then why have the Engineers that designed these not been brought to Justice to face charges of Gross incompetence resulting in the loss of lives?.

The many accusations aimed at the officials accused of cover ups etc are surely tantamount to Libel and Slander, why haven`t there been any respective law suits regarding this?.

And so much more.

Seriously, why does this come as a shock that those whom have 1st hand experience of National Security are starting to speak out?.

If there was profit to be made out of it, the USA government would openly declare war on peace.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags