Originally posted by Orion7911
So he's saying his perspective was to the left or (north?) of the Annex?
if so, then his angle wouldn't have permitted him to have properly judged whether the alleged plane was NOC or SOC. right?
Originally posted by SPreston
posted by BigSarge
While I have no idea if our Government was part of any conspiracy on 9/11, I can tell you 100% unequivically that it was an American Airlines plane that hit the Pentagon.
I can say this because at the time I was Soldier stationed at Ft. Myer, VA as a member of the US Army Honor Guard. We were conducting a funeral on 9-11-2001 in a section of Arlington cemetery that was right across from the Pentagon. We saw the plane come in from over the Naval Annex and seconds later watched the plane explode into the Pentagon. My group had been in the cemetery since early that morning and were unaware of the WTC attacks. We thought it was just a terrible accident.
How could the aircraft you allegedly saw have hit the Pentagon 1st floor if you saw it flying Over the Naval Annex? You do understand the difficulties involved in order for an aircraft to get from the Naval Annex to a position through the five light poles laying on the ground, low and level across the lawn, and into the 1st floor without hitting the foundation below, don't you? It is impossible.
Twenty plus (20+) other eyewitnesses have placed the aircraft Over the Naval Annex; so your initial placement of the aircraft is quite accurate. However after the Naval Annex, the aircraft had to remain above the light poles and overhead highway sign in its path, because none of those light poles were knocked down or laying on the ground. The aircraft was much much too high to hit the 1st floor without damaging the foundation. In other words; the aircraft had to come in level with the 1st floor in order to not dive down into the foundation. But it was too high to enter the 1st floor and too far north to knock down the light poles to the south or to create the alleged damage path through the Pentagon interior.
The FAA represents the true flight path rather well in its recent animation.
You do see why the official flight path through the light poles is irreconciliable with the actual flight path Over the Naval Annex which you and many other verified eyewitnesses saw, don't you?
The official flight path just does not fit with the actual evidence nor with the verified living eyewitness accounts.
[edit on 26-6-2009 by Orion7911]
Correct.
! BigSarge could
see it, as he's stated. Usually you'll see it most pronounced on windy days, watching airplanes land, but in Hanjour's case, he was aggressively
aiming to hit his target...it was not some magically smooth derring-do aeronautical feat, it was pure hack crappy rough flying with no regard to
passenger comfort!! 
:
