It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Specifications from Blackvault
Speed: Maximum operational speeds are reported to be in the range of Mach 5-8.
Ceiling: May have an operational altitude of 150,000 feet (28.4 miles) or higher.
Engine type: Scram jet or Pulse Detonation Wave Engines
Armament: Possibly Phoenix Missiles
Main Mission: Reconnasaince
Reports of plans for a high-performance piloted replacement for the SR-71 date back more than a decade. In 1979 it was reported that a:
"... Mach 4, 200,000-ft.-altitude aircraft that could be a follow-on to the Lockheed SR-71 strategic reconnaissance vehicle in the 1990s has been defined by the Air Force Aeronautical Systems Division and Lockheed."
As previously noted, reports of the existence of a successor to the SR-71 surfaced repeatedly during the debate over termination of the SR-71. Subsequent observations of mysterious aerial phenomena have been connected with the 1988 reports that Aurora was a Mach 6 stealthy reconnaissance aircraft that was being developed to replace the SR-71.
According to another report, by mid-1992:
"... Aurora was being flown from a base in the Nevada desert to an atoll in the Pacific, then on to Scotland to refuel before returning to the US at night. Specially modified tanker aircraft are being used to top up Aurora's tanks with liquid methane fuel in mid-air... The US Air Force is using the remote RAF airbase at Machrihanish, Strathclyde, as a staging point... The mystery aircraft has been dropping in at night before streaking back to America across the North Pole at more than six times the speed of sound... An F-111 fighter bomber is scrambling as the black-painted aircraft lands, flying in close formation to confuse prying civilian radars."
The rationale used most frequently by the Department of Defense for the SR-71's termination was financial. The Blackbird's operation and maintenance costs were very high. According to some reports, the SR-71's O&M costs were nearly $710- million in FY-90 and FY-91. Furthermore, they argued, imaging satellites could now conduct worldwide surveillance more efficiently and less expensively than manned reconnaissance aircraft.
Independent aerospace analysts, however, deflated this argument somewhat by pointing to the unique advantages aircraft bring to the reconnaissance arena. Aircraft, for example, are inherently flexible and unpredictable. Though not as fast as satellites, they can fly lower and the interval between over the horizon arrival and time-over-target is just as short. Aircraft have a wide choice of routes, so tracking ships are unlikely to see it on the way in. Application of low observable technology could further reduce warning time. Thus, it appears plausible that aircraft may still have a role in global reconnaissance.
Similar Aurora Sightings
Sightings of the Contrail
Element 115, the key to understanding how the ultra-secret "Black World" has created aircraft capable of manipulating gravity and space/time, has been identified, and the recent discovery of element 118, which decayed into element 114, further helps identify the possibilities.
The most important attribute of this heavier, stable element is that the gravity A wave is so abundant that it actually extends past the perimeter of the atom. These heavier, stable elements literally have their own gravity A field around them, in addition to the gravity B field that is native to all matter.
The Key To Gravity-Control Systems
No naturally occurring atoms on earth have enough protons and neutrons for the cumulative gravity A wave to extend past the perimeter of the atom so you can access it. Now even though the distance that the gravity A wave extends past the perimeter of the atom is infinitesimal, it is accessible and it has amplitude, wave length, and frequency, just like any other wave in the electromagnetic spectrum. Once you can access the gravity A wave, you can amplify it just like we amplify other electromagnetic waves.
And in like manner, the gravity A wave is amplified and then focused on the desired destination to cause the space/time distortion required for practical space travel.
This amplified gravity A wave is so powerful that the only naturally occurring source of gravity that could cause space/time to distort this much would be a black hole.
We're amplifying a wave that barely extends past the perimeter of an atom until it's large enough to distort vast amounts of space/time.
We synthesize heavier, unstable elements by using more stable elements as targets in a particle accelerator. We then bombard the target element with various atomic and sub-atomic particles. By doing this, we actually force neutrons into the nucleus of the atom and in some cases merge two dissimilar nuclei together. At this point, transmutation occurs, making the target element a different, heavier element.
As an example, in the early 80's, the lab for heavy ion research in Darmshtot, Germany synthesized some element 109 by bombarding Bismuth 203 with Iron 59. And to show you how difficult it is to do this, they had to bombard the target element for a week to synthesize 1 atom of element 109. And on that subject, this same lab has projected that in the future they should be able to bombard Curium 248 with with Calcium 48 to yield element 116 which will then decay through a series of nuclides which are unknown to them, but are well known to the scientists at S4 located within the complex of the Groom Lake "Area 51" installation.
The length of time which an element exists before it decays determines its stability. Atoms of some elements decay faster than atoms of other elements, so the faster an element decays, the more unstable that element is considered to be. When an atom decays, it releases or radiates sub-atomic particles and energy, which is the radiation that a Geiger counter detects.
More information on the Nazi Antarctic efforts and their attempts to impose a global dictatorship comes from Bulgarian physicist Vladimir Terziski. The following interview between Talk Show host Sam Russell and Terziski took place between 8-10 P.M., June 5th, 1993 on Sam Russell's 'OPEN MIND FORUM' program, KTKK [K-TALK] Radio in Salt Lake City, Utah. We will quote only those portions of the extensive conversation which tie-in directly with the subject at hand (Note: Some of the spellings of the names mentioned in the interview were transcribed phonetically from the tape. Actual spellings of these names which are identified as such may be different than they appear in the transcript, due perhaps in part to Mr. Terziski's Bulgarian accent):
SAM RUSSELL - ...I guess a place to start here, the Germans during World War II evidently had what was called the 'Foo Fighter', and this I guess is the name that the allied pilots gave to this curious-looking thing that would bob and weave and run around through the squadrons as they were flying over Germany to bomb and so on.
VLADIMIR TERZISKI - Exactly, the Foo Fighter, the 'fiery' ball. 'Foo' is 'fire' in French, it's also wind in Japanese... By the way Renato Vesco, who was the Italian [counterpart of] Wernher von Braun, the research scientist in charge of the ITALIAN Air Force and Space Research and Development program during the war, in his highly suppressed book in this country -- which is also available through our Academy -- 'INTERCEPT BUT DON'T SHOOT', talks about the whole family of turbojet saucers that were built by the Germans, all the way up to the Foo Fighter, the KUGELBLITZ and the FEUERBALL, two different models of basically the same device. And he also mentions a lot of ATTACKS of these machines on enemy bomber formations with DEVASTATING results for the bombers. Some of the Foo Fighters were doing 2900 kilometers an hour and up... a bomber would do maybe 300, 400, 500 at the most... so we're talking about 6, 7, 8 times the bomber speed. The most interesting thing that has not come up into, let's say, the work of Renato Vesco [because he talks only about the turbo-jet family of saucers... basically very simple saucers made with piston engines with propellers, spinning the lenticular airframe, the lens-shaped air frame of the craft thus creating gyroscopic antigravity -- and some of them were hybrids between helicopters with spinning rotor, basically aerodynamic lift and the gyroscopic lift of the spinning heavy mass of rotary engines. I wouldn't be amazed [if] the rotary engine itself were created to power a gyroscopically spinning saucer that had a big helicopter propeller on top, so it's kind of a hybrid between a helicopter and a saucer]... I even discovered...extremely rare drawings by the genius of German aviation, Lipish, the guy who built the first supersonic glider in the '30s and it is not Chuck Yeager who broke the sound barrier, but probably the Germans 10 years earlier with their... supersonic gliders that Lipish built. Anyway, Lipish was designing at the end of the war a supersonic ram-jet propulsion craft with anti-gravity assists.
Earlier today, I was flying into ATL. The plane was about 80 miles NE of Atlanta, when it banked, and I happened to look up and out the window. I noticed a few jet contrails very high up, way above our cruising altitude of I would guess about 2 miles, since we were nearing our destination. We were above the cumilonimbus clouds, but below the cirrus. I'm not sure of our exact altitude, but the jet trails I saw were WAY higher. The one that really caught my high was parallel to the others, but it was a just a long grouping of circular rings of cloud. There was no rope, just a long series of... o o o o o's.
Now, I've never seen a UFO or anything, and I'm not a conspiracy nut, but I have heard about the Aurora. It seemed unlikely, but I saw it with my own eyes today. It ranked up there with the strange and eerie things that I've seen. No jet engine I've ever heard of could produce such a trail.
I've looked in to a lot of the secret type stuff before, but have never actually seen anything that resembled a shred of evidence, until of course I actually saw something inexplicable myself. It was a very weird experience to see something that actually proves (at least to me) that there is something out there that's completely revolutionary and light years beyond simple jet engines or ram jets or anything we know about. Now, I don't believe its based on alien technology from Area 51 or anything like that, but it's still very odd.
I live under the westerly heading landing approach to Vancouver
airport. The aircraft are low enough to be interesting but high enough to
not be a bother. Also my office is adjacent to the airport. This contrail
was made by a very fast and very high-flying aircraft. Usually I can make
out the aircraft even if at cruise altitude, 30k+, but not this time. It
went horizon to horizon in about 30 seconds. Now I haven't tried to
calculate the speed but it was so impressive that it drew my
attention. The "donuts" in the contrail made me jump into my briefcase for
my camera. I really have no evidence of anything other than an unusual
Standing outside with my watch, 30 seconds seems perhaps too short a time
but the craft passed horizon to horizon certainly in no more than 60
seconds. Northwest to southeast at great altitude. No sound, no visible
craft. The sky has daily contrails but as I said before it was the speed
that drew my attention to this particular set.
A few weeks back some other contrails were also very interesting. There
were multiple trails around and around each other as if there had been a
very high altitude dogfight between many aircraft. A real "hairball" I
think is the term. Very reminiscent of the photos of the "Battle of
Britain" dogfights. In Canada our airforce doesn't have the budget to do
much of this and any time NORAD has an exercise on it is usually announced.
Not this time. Interesting.
I live in Waterloo, Iowa, not far from SAC base in Omaha, NE. Almost weekly for many months now, we have been observing the "doughnut on a rope" contrails in the sky. They usually occur on the weekends later in the day and early evening.
The first time I noticed them was in June. We had traveled north to Waverly, Iowa for an early dinner and on the way home, around 7pm, I noticed a strange contrail in the western sky. It took a few minutes to dawn on me what it might be. An Aurora!
I had seen a tv program on Discovery Channel back in '97 that was all about the Aurora and I distinctly remember the contrail. We started paying more attention to contrails after that and sure enough almost every weekend, (Sat. afternoon, early evening) while sitting out on our back patio, right overhead, those contrails. I have never been able to spot the plane making them, but from now on I will be ready with the binoculars just in case!