India Far side of the Moon photos - oddities, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 11:57 AM by freighttrain
reply to post by warrenb



what I don't get is, why is there always "few" photos release of the dark side of the moon... where the hell is the rest of the "thousands" of photos that are taken?! and why take so long to release them to public (air brushing)?


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 12:20 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by freighttrain



...why is there always "few" photos release of the dark side of the moon... where the hell is the rest of the "thousands" of photos that are taken?!


Actually, freighttrain, there are. AND, once and for all....There is no "dark side" of the Moon!!! I am tired of this misconception!!

There is a 'Dark Side' of the Earth....happens once every 24 hours. The Moon also experiences a series of dark/light....except, for someone who might live on the Moon, a "day" would last about 13~14 Earth days...same with the 'night'. Depends on the latitude, just as it does on the Earth.

Here...if you don't trust NASA, here are old pics from the old USSR:

www.mentallandscape.com...



[edit on 6/18/0909 by weedwhacker]


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 12:45 PM by smurfy
reply to post by freighttrain

There is a hidden side though,maybe people just like to think of hidden things, as dark things.
I agree with Weedwhacker that the Moonclip 1 pic is a Crater within a Crater.


[edit on 18-6-2009 by smurfy]


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:13 PM by Taymour



reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:15 PM by spikey
reply to post by star in a jar



Couldn't agree more...these pictures MUST be deliberately poor quality, because (and i hate to say it) the photos from the Luna Orbiter and Apollo series from the 1960's are better quality than these , and thats saying something!

Who spends 100's of millions, send a craft (their countrys' first too) the hundreds of thousands of miles and all of the complexity that entails, with a camera that takes worse quality snaps than craft from the 60's?!
I bet, from that altitude, you'd get comparable results from a high street digicam, if you could get it there.

They must be holding back the good stuff, or if not, i say what an absolute waste of money.


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:19 PM by sean
reply to post by scubagravy



When you look at this picture it's a crater with a shadow that seems completely normal but, then there is another crater impact within the shadowed part that is completely illuminated within the shadow of the larger crater! It doesn't seem logical to me and this picture is probably completely fake. A moon model and a little misplaced paint splatter


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:33 PM by smurfy
reply to post by sean

In Moonclip1 the small Crater right hand face is picking up the light from the Southwest,which is at a very low down angle and the very dark shadow is cast by the lower left lip of the Crater.



[edit on 18-6-2009 by smurfy]



reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:53 PM by spikey
reply to post by sean



Spot on.

Either this is a copy and paste of a crater from another photo, onto something we're not meant to see to cover it, or the small crater at the bottom of the large one, must be self illuminating!

How can a crater, at the bottom of a large crater, tucked right down the bottom left of it too, where the whole area is in dark shadow, yet be lit up brighter than virtually anything else?

It cannot be catching the sun, it's lower than the bottom left crest of the large crater. It's this bottom left crest, that's casting it's shadow on the large crater!


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 02:55 PM by General_Salazar
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by General_Salazar



In the middle of the small crater is a strange shape that is symmetrical and partially covers the floor of the crater.


It's known as a "shadow". It is the shadowing of the small crater's rim, and the uneven surface of the crater's floor.

At the risk of repeating myself, the photos were taken whilst the Sun was at a low, or oblique, angle. This accentuates the shadows.

Compare to GoogleEarth photos....they are usually taken (or posted) when the Sun is nearly vertical, to minimize shadows. When GoogleEarth shows a car, in an image, we already know how large a car is supposed to be. A boulder on the Moon??? No frame of reference. We have to then understand the pixel resolution of the photo, etc......in order to guess at size. The shadows help, in those calculations.


As a former professional photographer, I am well aware of the effects brought about by low angle sunlight

At the the risk of repeating myself ( ), the anomaly that sits above the basin of the small crater is symmetrical and does not show the high contrast lighting you would expect from being illuminated at such a sharp angle.

When zoomed, it looks like the original crater basin can be seen underneath the anomaly and it also seems to cover the shadow on the side of the crater. But it is difficult to say for sure what is going on without a view from another angle, rather than the current top-down view.

If it is actually the basin itself, then it is strange, as it is a symmetrical trapezoid rather than the circular or eliptical shape one would expect from a high velocity impact and in terms of lighting it is still not consistant with the rest of the crater it sits in.

Due to it's odd lighting I am open to the possibility that it could simply be a graphical artefact resulting from being compressed as a jpeg from an already low quality original, but it just looks "wrong".


reply posted on 18-6-2009 @ 03:16 PM by SpaceMonkeys
Originally posted by sean
reply to
post by scubagravy



When you look at this picture it's a crater with a shadow that seems completely normal but, then there is another crater impact within the shadowed part that is completely illuminated within the shadow of the larger crater! It doesn't seem logical to me and this picture is probably completely fake. A moon model and a little misplaced paint splatter


you are absolutely right. The lighting within this whole scene seems completely wrong, thats why it looks so perculiar. This is a great find.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



"My God, its full of stars!"
  Posted 19 days ago with 83 member flags
Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 8 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 2 days ago with 49 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 12 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 9 days ago with 19 member flags