New Analysis Video of the STS-75 Tether Incident , page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 75 times


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 09:25 AM by JimOberg










reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 09:51 AM by Malcram
reply to post by JimOberg



I think we can summarize your last three posts simply as:

NASA says 'there's nothing to see here, move along'

Well, we know that's what NASA's response is. Isn't it always? You have to remember that for many at ATS, NASA is the 'defendant', accused of fraud and gross deception. Which means quoting members of NASA in support of NASA's 'findings' is pretty meaningless. It's rather like the defense in court waving a piece of paper and saying "I have here a written statement by the defendant which clearly and eloquently states how upstanding and innocent of all charges he is and which completely validates the account of the events he gave us earlier."

Oh well, case dismissed then.

[edit on 8-6-2009 by Malcram]


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 10:03 AM by Exuberant1
reply to post by Malcram



Greetings Malcram!

Check out this video - it shows the STS-75 tether UFOs appear out of nowhere



*I like this video.



reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 10:18 AM by Malcram
reply to post by Exuberant1



Another good one. I've been impressed by the video evidence in this thread. I really don't know what exactly we are looking at. All I know is that I have to strain credulity infinitely more to pretend that they must all be particles and ice crystals etc. than I do to entertain.......other options . It's one of those cases for me in which the 'prosaic explanations' are not actually prosaic upon closer examination - because the prosaic stuff just DOES NOT DO what these things are recorded doing.


[edit on 8-6-2009 by Malcram]


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 10:34 AM by JimOberg
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to
post by JimOberg



I think we can summarize your last three posts simply as:

NASA says 'there's nothing to see here, move along'

Well, we know that's what NASA's response is. Isn't it always? You have to remember that for many at ATS, NASA is the 'defendant', accused of fraud and gross deception. Which means quoting members of NASA in support of NASA's 'findings' is pretty meaningless. It's rather like the defense in court waving a piece of paper and saying "I have here a written statement by the defendant which clearly and eloquently states how upstanding and innocent of all charges he is and which completely validates the account of the events he gave us earlier."

Oh well, case dismissed then.

[edit on 8-6-2009 by Malcram]


I think, differently, that your attitude is 'we don't need to ask the defendant for an explanation, string him up.'

Why bother with primary witnesses at all?

Why bother with the lighting conditions at all, 'glowing plasma' is so much more thrilling.

Why bother with reality at all?

Well, I'm the guest, and it's your sandbox, so go right ahead.


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 11:17 AM by Jimmy2theR
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to
post by JimOberg



I think, differently, that your attitude is 'we don't need to ask the defendant for an explanation, string him up.'

Why bother with primary witnesses at all?

Why bother with the lighting conditions at all, 'glowing plasma' is so much more thrilling.

Why bother with reality at all?

Well, I'm the guest, and it's your sandbox, so go right ahead.



What about those huge transluscent objects flying in from over the shuttles' right side? You can see them as they go on their path, hit the earth's atmosphere, turning into a black sphere, then as they enter, they become white pulsating spheres hovering over inside the atmosphere. Taken with UV and Infra-red cameras. A well known filmmaker we all know here at ATS has a film coming out that has incredible details on these particular scenes that I am sure is going to make you think more about them being ships or some kind of bio-organism, rather than these lame explanations you always rely on explaining away these anomalies. I'm sure you never even noticed this footage. Jimmy2theR


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 02:28 PM by JScytale
Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to
post by Malcram



Greetings Malcram!

Check out this video - it shows the STS-75 tether UFOs appear out of nowhere



listen to the original video.
"just moving into sunrise..."
objects are bound to emerge from the earth's shadow.


reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 02:31 PM by JScytale
Originally posted by i_want_the_truth
EXPLAIN THE CHANGE IN TRAJECTORIES !!!!!

Yes, it is plausible it could be ice or whatever...but

Never mind what it "actually is" ice, debris, marbles, .......

The main point is that these objects are changing speed as well as direction!!!!!!!

How can any piece of ice or debris change direction ??????


allow me to quote myself, because people seem to not read intermediate pages.

Originally posted by JScytale
reply to
post by Exuberant1



attempting to demonstrate a parabolic arc from a near-head on angle.



notice the trajectory. now imagine a particle following it exactly - it appears to move in one direction, slow down, and make a complete U-turn.

now imagine yourself positioned *exactly* in line with the direction of its motion. it will appear to move, slow down, come to a complete stop for a moment, and reverse its course 180 degrees exactly.


Originally posted by JScytale
in space, particles will move in a slight to strong parabolic arc. depending on their speed, the arc could be un-noticeable. if an object moves fast enough, the slight arc exactly matches the curvature of the earth. thats what we call orbit. orbit is moving so fast that you fall just quickly enough to drop down the same amount that the earth drops away from your trajectory, in layman's terms.

objects can easily bump into each other. they can be easily influenced by particles too small to notice - and were talking about visible objects in space after a satellite broke. a lot of debris is in space. a *whole* lot. and its not going to just "fall out of the way" immediately because due to momentum, its velocity matches the satellite's + whatever forces caused it to snap off in whatever direction it snapped off into.

bear in mind the shuttle also possesses thrusters that fire frequently to correct its orbit. these thrusters are more than capable of influencing particles.

if you're having trouble understanding how orbit works, try this intuitive, interactive explanation.
spaceplace.nasa.gov...



reply posted on 8-6-2009 @ 02:57 PM by Komodo
Originally posted by JScytale
reply to
post by afgang



......In my eyes, 99% of these objects are pretty much conclusively micrometeorites and debris.


sorry to burst your bubble, but this isn't a logical statement.

micrometeorites and debris, which have NO intelligence...

'fly' to a spot near the tether and remain at a .5 sec stand still and THEN shoot from a standstill in space and launch in the opposite direction....as the EC stated.. in a delta-V direction...

you did watch the video ... didn't you and read the external content..

this type of movement denotes either remotely controlled objects from the shuttle or elsewhere or they are self-powered and are being controlled from within the light sources themselves.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 24 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 119 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 94 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 64 replies