It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seventh
Who are we humble forumites to argue with those that know every single aspect of 9/11, politicians, counter terrorism veterans, structural engineers, military personal.
No matter how much disinfo and debunking goes on, nothing disproves or undermines the OS more than these big guns openly stating the farce that is the OS`s account of that fateful day.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The bottom line is that the un#ingbelieveably vast majority (99%+) of experts say that the towers fell in a matter consistent with the official story AND many have put forth hard evidence and simulations to support it.
[...]
I happen to be an engineer several degrees over. I've got the education and experience to assess many of the claims. Most people however, do not. If there is one thing people don't learn in their schooling it's that experience counts. Experienced engineers, almost without exception, believe the 9/11 conspiracy claims to be bunk..
[...]
If the conspiracy had any meat to it then then the hundreds of thousands of qualified people around the world would say so. They haven't.
Originally posted by jprophet420
reply to post by mmiichael
Conjecture without fact by a 'credible source' is still conjecture without fact.
Originally posted by mmiichael
The bottom line is that the un#ingbelieveably vast majority (99%+) of experts say that the towers fell in a matter consistent with the official story
Originally posted by bsbray11
No, the bottom line is ill-informed people like you keep saying this when there is absolutely no statistics to support it.
There ARE polls, scientific ones even that were carried out by Zogby, but I'm sure you won't walk to talk about them, because obviously they are biased.
When you talk evidence, instead of perpetually insisting you're right because everyone already agrees with you, maybe someone who matters will give a damn what you say.
Originally posted by bsbray11
You talk like it's the evidence itself that matters to you (through the eyes of experts only, of course -- and even then, only the experts YOU like), but when it comes down to it, I know for a fact that you will defer to experts on the technical issues and so have no idea what you are talking about.
So basically, I am tired of hearing about how many people you think agree with you. I am saying the same thing you THINK you are: it doesn't matter how many people. But unfortunately that is ALWAYS what you turn back to, and that is why I don't even care to argue with people like you anymore. You say it's the evidence that matters but then you will eventually say you yourself aren't qualified to comment on such and such anomaly and somebody else just must know better. No worries. Carry on.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Anyone who does not do this or thinks they have sufficient understanding to make absolute judgements based on their limited knowledge is fooling themselves.
Originally posted by bsbray11
I'm not making absolute judgments. I am one of the ones who thinks a much more in-depth investigation is needed, remember? Are you, or have you reached an absolute judgment?
I will just say this. There are "anomalies" with the "official theory." Just so we are clear about this I will only mention the eutectic reaction (NO other form of corrosion!!) that made its way onto WTC columns and ate holes through them, as per FEMA app. C. An anomaly is by definition something that we do not understand, or else it would not be an "anomaly."
Something we do not understand. As a matter of fact, scientists have traditionally viewed anomalies with any scientific theory as evidence that that theory is lacking information and is incomplete or incorrect. Something to think about. Not saying it's evidence of anything, except your lack of understanding.
Originally posted by bsbray11
I will just say this. There are "anomalies" with the "official theory." Just so we are clear about this I will only mention the eutectic reaction (NO other form of corrosion!!) that made its way onto WTC columns and ate holes through them, as per FEMA app. C. An anomaly is by definition something that we do not understand, or else it would not be an "anomaly."
Originally posted by exponent
This is a completely fair analysis, but utterly inconsequential.
Originally posted by bsbray11
You say this like you know where the "revisions" of the theory need to be, before they have even been made.
I'll let you guys circle jerk to this one, though, because you have nothing to do with any of it anyway, so there's little point wasting time arguing with you about it.
Originally posted by exponent
I speak of confidence in the statistical sense, there is a massive amount of evidence favouring the 'official story'. As I have repeatedly pointed out in this thread, even if we accept that this is thermite, many serious questions remain which are currently unanswered.
[...]
I hope that Jones does in fact submit this to an independent lab for analysis.
Originally posted by mmiichael
Interesting reply to this on another thread from an ATS memeber who is also an engineer.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The bottom line is that the un#ingbelieveably vast majority (99%+) of experts say that the towers fell in a matter consistent with the official story AND many have put forth hard evidence and simulations to support it.
[...]
I happen to be an engineer several degrees over. I've got the education and experience to assess many of the claims. Most people however, do not. If there is one thing people don't learn in their schooling it's that experience counts. Experienced engineers, almost without exception, believe the 9/11 conspiracy claims to be bunk..
[...]
If the conspiracy had any meat to it then then the hundreds of thousands of qualified people around the world would say so. They haven't.
Mike
[edit on 12-7-2009 by mmiichael]
Originally posted by turbofan
Love your signature Seventh, and the link you supplied in your last post.
There are some great references there for everyone to study.
Originally posted by Seventh
Looking at the bigger picture, take a deep breath and look at every single aspect of that fateful day, be it the complete twisting of the laws of physics, every single one of those planes managed to perform outstanding feats of never done beforeness, as did the collapse of three towers, locating passports belonging to the terrorists, piloting skills that veteran Jet pilots would be pushed to accomplish, and so much more.
NIST`s report is flawed and John Gross`s denial of evidence of molten steel can plainly be disproved no doubting this, just this one aspect again must raise alarm bells, if there were explosives planted there would have to have been a lot of building work undertaken prior to 9/11, again this has been exposed, if there were controlled detonations they would be seen in the videos, yet again this is covered, also the use of thermite to weaken and remove any resistance has also been indentified.
Every single angle that would back up and make the Truthers version seem realistic has been covered, now the debunkers have tried to negate every single aspect of this, and this matters not, what does matter however is that there is all this evidence to debunk in the 1st place.