posted on Jun, 16 2011 @ 01:01 PM
Originally posted by bsbray11
By the way, this is amongst the most wonderfully tortured pieces of logic I've ever seen on this site. Which is quite an acheivement.
I don't see how. You asked for a source for what he said. In the same post, and obviously before he had a chance to actually post it, you were
already making excuses and insinuating how if there was actually such a poll, then you would challenge its "methodology."
You know what you argue makes no sense and that more and more people are disagreeing with you, but you just build your wall of lame excuses higher
and higher rather than ever considering you may have been wrong this whole time you've been spewing garbage.
edit on 13-6-2011 by bsbray11
because: (no reason given)
So asking for a properly conducted poll is an insinuation? All I said was that if someone could do this I'd be very surprised.
You failed to do so. Indeed you provided one whose psephological accuracy you cheerfully admit you neither know nor care about! How is this adding to
the debate, except apparently providing you with a reason to complain when I don't accept such poorly researched and sourced evidence as you?
If I ask you for any kind of proof of anything are you at liberty to simply say you don't care about its factual accuracy or methodology as long as
it agrees with you? I suppose you sort of have to be, otherwise you'd have nothing at all.