It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NWOhereNOW
It would have saved countless lives had we not engaged in war... Fathers and husbands would not have been killed. Blacks would not have been enslaved.
Oh, what legacy our weapons leave behind. War, death, and slavery.
Of course, your type are all FOR WAR and FOR WEAPONS OF DEATH.
Originally posted by cbianchi513
Originally posted by NWOhereNOW
It would have saved countless lives had we not engaged in war... Fathers and husbands would not have been killed. Blacks would not have been enslaved.
By whose measure? George III? Oh wait... you mean English fathers and husbands would have been saved... The colonists would still be under the Draconian rule.
Slavery??? What a shining example of historical revision! Boy, you're American History teacher must be a real card!
It could be argued that the only reason slavery continued past the revolution is that it was not deemed a popular enough issue to revise until after the war of northern aggression.
There are scores of others on this board that are like minded. We are neither psychopaths, nor criminals. You vilify us for our steadfast belief in the RIGHTS the Constitution grants us?
There's just no reasoning with fools.
Originally posted by reluctantpawn
I don't understand. Which constitution previous to this one?
respectfully
reluctantpawn
Originally posted by Question
If you honestly have such a low view of your God given rights, that you're too willing to give them away in order to feel "safe" then perhaps you might consider another haven like Cuba, or Hitler's 3rd reich Germany, to see what your kind of "we don't need to defend ourselves" philosophy does to people.
Originally posted by thewind
reply to post by jitombe
"So you think having your own guns will protect you from the nwo?"
Which house would you rather rob, the one who you know is an armmed citizen, or the one you know is completely helpless? If you read my post closely, you'd have understood it's meaning?
The coming apocalypse is not the nwo, it's the robbing and killing by average citizens who will do what they have to to keep from starving!
Also, do you think that the PTB can ever be voted outta office? Elections are rigged, and that's a fact! The only way we're ever gonna be rid of the nwo is to kill the head and let the body die! This feat can be done without the firing of a single shot from any gun, but you'll never get anybody to go along with it!
Ya wanna kill the NWO? Stop spending their worthless FIAT currency, and demand that our gov't start printing american currency! All americans should just simply walk off their jobs and refuse to work and not allow anybody else to go in and do their job! I just read an article where a congressman said that banks own and run our gov't. Truer words were never ever said!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banks run Congress, top Democrat says
By John Byrne
rawstory.com...
Originally posted by Question
reply to post by NWOhereNOW
Maybe it is you that seems to forget what the constitution is about. The constitution, or at least the bill of rights (the first 10 amendments) are simply a reminder of people's natural laws. If you remember correctly, these are INALIENABLE which means? they CANNOT CHANGE! Also, you forget that these rights are ENDOWED by our creator (God, allah, spaghetti monster, whatever) Therefore, neither YOU nor the government hold the power to strip the people of these rights.
As stated, the bill of rights (first 10 amendments) can be seen as reminders of what our natural born rights are. We are BIRTHED with these rights, the right to speak our mind, the right to defend ourselves, the right to defend myself properly in court, etc. etc. Nobody can take these rights away unless we let them. So yes, we will continue to practice our right to bear arms even if somehow the idiots in power managed to "change" the constitution to reflect that. We will continue to defend ourselves against a rogue govt. or cowards such as yourself who are to afraid of even their neighbors, that they feel they need to enforce some kind of draconian rule in order to feel "safe"
You are living in circular reasoning fantasy land.
How do you know God exists?
Because the bible said so!
How can you believe the bible?
Because God wrote it!
Those papers, those amendments, are not some magical blanket that changes reality and protects us. We only have rights because those in power agree to give us those rights and agree to play the game of rules.
How do you know its a right to own a weapon?
Because the constitution says so!
How can you believe the constitution?
Because its a right to own a weapon!
Rules can be broken. Governments can be dissolved. Martial law can be implemented. Rights can be taken away. You may be happy with your guns, but they'll be happier standing over your dead corpse.
How about a quote from one of the founding fathers?
I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
It's obvious today that the second aendment is a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.
[edit on 1-6-2009 by NWOhereNOW]