It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by billybob65
your right my friend, obama will constrict the American population.
he never said what change they fight for, or who they will stop.
the answers are these, the change is the change of government into a totalitarian regime, and the people they are resisting, are the citizens that refuse to be slaves!
[spam link removed]
[edit on 15-5-2009 by 12m8keall2c]
Originally posted by heliosprime
Enter Obama, sweeping on the american political landscape like a spring storm. Screaming "Hope and Change". Yet 66 million of the electorate did not vote for him. Their values and convictions differing sharply from Obama's.
Within a short 100 days obama has set into motion what many of those 66 million see as extreme radical ideas. He has taken over private industry (banks, GM, Chrysler) beginning the take over of health care, spending trillions of future tax income for generations, bowing to saudi princes, appologizing for just about everything america has ever done in the world. He's pushing forth a global warming agenda that many KNOW is false. He is seeking backdoor gun bans through international treatys. Has created abject FEAR in many of the 66 million and beyond of how fast he is moving. He is openly speaking to many long time enemies of america as if they were allies.
Or is obama marching toward tyranny? Can he through all these many actions create such a climate of hate, fear and anger that there will be open rebellion? Can he create enough anarchy to declare himself "dictator" to save amreica from another civil war?
The left is already promoting the idea that a civil war will be led somehow by the republican party and "redneck bubba's"...
Obama knows all too well that real american governmental process are too slow for him to rise to total global power if left to normal channels. All that he is doing is to creat total anarchy so the "people" just as they did in ancient rome will declare Obama......"dictator" for life..............
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
The left's solution for being displaced in government: grass roots campaigns, protests, party reinvention, voter drives.
The right's solution for being displaced in government: get so angry at the left that you circulate military rebellion and civil war.
Interesting.
Originally posted by heliosprime
As ussual you ignore actual history, errr.....in the 1960's there was much violence, bombings, riots, all caused by the "left"
seem to remember a close friend of Obama was one of those bombers.
The "black panthers" killed police.
you mean "acorn"?
Originally posted by heliosprime
Lets not forget the greatest "organizer" of all time, dear adolf, who got his start as a grass roots organizer for the NAZI party.........history....or america's near future?
Originally posted by heliosprime
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
The left's solution for being displaced in government: grass roots campaigns, protests, party reinvention, voter drives.
The right's solution for being displaced in government: get so angry at the left that you circulate military rebellion and civil war.
Interesting.
As ussual you ignore actual history, errr.....in the 1960's there was much violence, bombings, riots, all caused by the "left"....seem to remember a close friend of Obama was one of those bombers. The "black panthers" killed police. Other "liberation armies" robbed banks.........
As far as "voter" drives for the left.....you mean "acorn"? Your grass roots is very similar to what "lenin" did around 1917, and then there was stalin, mao, pol pot...Obama is moving faster that any of them...
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
I find it especially funny that you link him with Hitler and apparently have no idea how Hitler got in to power, what support groups placed him there, and what the Weimar Republic was to Germany back then. I suggest you Google it. You might be surprised, because from the viewpoint of anyone who knows history, you would not have been with the Weimar Republic
I also noticed you failed to produce any evidence or even counter my questions raised in the OP. Would that be because you are unable to source anything or even show a modicum of bipartisanship? Thought so.
As part of his duties, Hitler also was asked to spy on certain local political groups, and during a meeting of the German Workers' Party, became so incensed by one of the speeches that he uncorked a fierce harangue at the speaker. The party's founder, Anion Drexler, was so impressed by Hitler's tirade that he asked him to join their organization. Hitler, after some thought, finally agreed in September 1919. He was eventually given responsibility for publicity and propaganda. His oratory succeeded in attracting larger and larger audiences and party donations. The party's name was changed to the National Socialist German Workers Party (NAZI) on April 1, 1920.
Illinois State Senator Barack Obama gave this address on Tuesday, July 27, 2004 before the Democratic National Convention. The son of an African goat herder and a white mother from Kansas delivered this rousing keynote address that heralded him as one of his party's fastest rising stars. He later won the election to represent Illinois in the Senate. This speech was considered one of the greatest given at a Democratic Convention
Originally posted by Avenginggecko
Did I ever say ACORN, or are you just trying to bait me? ACORN was not the sole, nor the primary factor in Democratic vote drives. I'd ask you to actually stick with facts and address the post rather than put words in people's mouths to try and divert the topic.
While we don't yet know what's really going on, we do know these ACORN affiliates have powerful friends, like the SEIU — the Service Employees International Union. Actually, they're even more than friends; they're swapping so much spit they're riddled with mono.
The head of ACORN, Wade Rathke, is the founder and chief organizer of SEIU, which donated $33 million to President Obama's campaign last year. We also know that the place the main ACORN affiliate calls home in New Orleans, is supposed to house about 270 related organizations, a mix of corporations and non-profits from California to Louisiana.
Does that former funeral home look big enough to you to house 270 organizations? The owner of the building is a company whose partners are — oh my gosh! — Wade and Dale Rathke (name sounds familiar?)
As I told you earlier, Wade also happens to be the president of ACORN and he and his brother Dale — who's accused of embezzling $1 million — are listed as president or partner in dozens of companies based in that building in New Orleans.
So that's what we know so far. But the big question remains unanswered: Millions of dollars flow into that building every year; where does it go?
October 30, 2008
Obama’s ACORN roots run deep
Byline: bob | Category: 2008 Presidential Election | Posted at: 6:20 am
Obama spokesman Sean Smith:
Our campaign has not coordinated with ACORN whatsoever on any voter registration activities.
Really:
Anita Moncrief, a former Washington staffer for Project Vote, which she described as a sister organization of the community activist group ACORN, said her supervisor told her the list of campaign contributors came from the Obama campaign.
Moncrief said she has a copy of a “development plan” that outlines how Obama contributors who had “maxed out” under federal contribution limits would be targeted to give to Project Vote, and that it was her job to identify such contributors.
Moncrief’s testimony before a Pennsylvania court links ACORN, a group which by law must remain non-partisan to maintain its tax exempt status, directly to the Obama campaign.
I guess I’ve finally found a tax increase I like: the one that ACORN is going to get, not to mention the fines for tax fraud that they’ll receive, when this is all over.
MORE from John Fund, who is probably the nation’s foremost expert on the issue of vote fraud.
The Hebrew word נְפִילִים (nephilim) may mean "those causing others to fall". Abraham ibn Ezra proposes that they were called this because men's hearts would fail at the sight of them. Jean Leclerc and Peter of Aquila among others suggest that it is derived from the warlike nature of the Nephilim, comparing the usage of Naphal in Job 1:15 "And the Sabeans fell upon them" where Naphal means "to take in battle". Alternatively, Shadal understands nephilim as deriving from the Hebrew word פלא Pela which means wondrous.[1] Another possibility is that the term is a generic term for "giants" in general,[2] which is consistent with the Septuagint and Vulgate translations of the word. Some expositors believe it may refer more to the ferocity and strength of the people who are referred to, rather than their physical height,[3][4] though in the Book of Numbers intentional stress on height is apparent, whether metaphorical or actual (see below on Anakim).