|
|
Topic started on 6-5-2009 @ 03:19 PM by David9176
|
                       +52 more
The USA state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law. I mean REVOLUTIONARY. The State of Montana has defied the federal
government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana . The federal government fears
citizens owning guns. They try to curtail what types of guns they can own. The gun control laws all have one common goal - confiscation of privately
owned firearms. Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government. The fed now either takes them on and
risks them saying the federal agents have no right to violate their state gun laws and arrest the federal agents that try to enforce the federal
firearms acts. This will be a world-class event to watch. Montana could go to voting for secession from the union, which is really throwing the
gauntlet in Obama's face. If the federal government does nothing they lose face. Gotta love it.
www.gather.com...
law.rightpundits.com...
And it's official. Signed today.
I don't know exactly what will come of it....but I think we'll see much more of this in the future from other states as well.
The government has really become far too large.....I think states are doing the right thing by challenging the federal government.
Without the threat of SECESSION.....what good is there to have State RIGHTS?
video here of Tennessee considering the same thing!: www.wztv.com...
[edit on 6-5-2009 by David9176]
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Political News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:23 PM by Redpillblues
|
       
This just solidified my mind of moving to Montana...Beutiful state,with BALLSSSSS!!!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:29 PM by David9176
|
       
Utah legislators eye Montana gun law
SALT LAKE CITY -- Utah lawmakers are considering following Montana's lead and claiming state's rights in the war over gun control. The Montana
Legislature passed and its governor signed into law a measure making guns that are made and kept within state boundaries exempt from federal
regulations. That means they're exempt from things like background checks, licensing and registration.
www.ksl.com...
Utah is considering this as well. All it takes is one....and Montana just did it.
We'll see what happens!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:36 PM by ou_sooners_19
|
      
Come on Arkansas!!! Please be next!!!
2 lines...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:38 PM by KSPigpen
|
Awesome. I really like to see things like this happening. Force thier hand. Almost always a good move. I can't wait to see if this is the beginning
of other states doing the same. For some reason I think I might have to move.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:40 PM by David9176
|

reply to post by KSPigpen
I suspect more will...although I wouldn't count on any dominant blue states doing it...or any other state for that matter who is in major trouble
financially...such as California....but i could be wrong!
Edit to add:
And i was wrong...as the governor of Montana is a registered Democrat.
[edit on 6-5-2009 by David9176]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:43 PM by Beach Bum
|
            
I say this to any and all states willing to fight against moronic gun laws. "GO go go." One day maybe D.C. will learn they can't scare people into
giving up their guns and all their freedoms. Obama is starting to look like Bush Jr. the Second and people are starting to wake up. I can proudly say
I for one didn't vote for this scum bag and can't wait for him to leave.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:43 PM by severdsoul
|

I'm going to have to do some serious digging and reading and see if the bill grandfathers in guns already owned, or if i have to shell out cash to
buy all new guns. (or a way to stamp the ones i already have).
I would hate to think i would have to buy all new guns, but it would be worth it in the long run.
At least i dont have to worry about hunting season any more and the fed's taking away our guns.
Although that may come under fire next, cant get the guns, pull the tags.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:48 PM by FX44rice
|
    
This is good action by Montana. It would lead you to believe they feared eventual gun ban legislation out of DC. Should we all be taking the fear
mongering of 2nd amendment abolishment more seriously? I guess the Montana Gov. did.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 03:49 PM by David9176
|
I would like to see Michigan do this as well....but we have Granholm as governor.
Many people up here own guns...when she's out it would be a possibility...but it won't right now....not with the auto industry as it is especially.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:35 PM by kettlebellysmith
|
     
reply to post by ou_sooners_19
[mor
My sentiments exactly. It's time this state stood up to the Feds. God knows our senators don't!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:40 PM by thisguyrighthere
|
     
I just wrote to Dan Itse (the rep responsible for the failed NH states rights bill) about this. Hopefully it is taken into consideration. He isnt my
rep but my reps are worthless tyrant sympathizers.
I also read that Utah and Tennessee are considering similar measures to ensure they do not succumb to any more and possibly retract some federal level
insanity.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:40 PM by XTexan
|
     
Excellent!!!
I hope to see Texas following up with its own version very soon. Time to start writing my reps again, lol...
This will be interesting and I look forward to seeing where it goes.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:47 PM by PrisonerOfSociety
|
              
Forgive my ignorance, but how is this possible?
1. Doesn't the US constitution override any law in a state?
2. What about the supposed North American Union? Aren't they supposed be creating a super-state, so the NWO can amalgamate all nations under a common
umbrella of one currency, one governance.
Personally, this is absolutely fantastic news
Governments around the World should be broken apart into little pieces and each state/county should embellish their own laws and regulations, as
deemed appropriate by LOCAL people.
Some fat f**k bureaucrat behind a desk thousands of miles in Washington, should never, ever tell a farmer how to milk his cows.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:50 PM by MysterE
|
 
I always enjor reading your posts David because I can turn my BS filter off and get to the nitty gritty! Anyways here are some additional links that
might help.
This is the text of the bill
HOUSE BILL NO. 246
This is the vote count and other pertinant information
Laws detailed information page
-E-
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:56 PM by XTexan
|
    
reply to post by PrisonerOfSociety
To the best of my knowledge, which could be flawed, the constitution does not grant the Fed the right to institute gun control laws. Since the
constitution does not give that right to the Fed then the right falls to the states.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think I'm right
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:56 PM by David9176
|
   
reply to post by MysterE
Thanks for the info!
Most of the time i'm freaking angry with government..especially the federal government.
But this is something to be proud of.
I just want someone to stand up to the power of the federal government. States should have power over the federal government!!!!
The power the federal government now has is completely insane. Everything is forced down our throats.
As I stated before...for those who denounce secession....it's the only threat a state can impose to PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS!!!
I don't want secession.....but the very threat of it may get things under control!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 04:59 PM by wonderworld
|
I’m all for Montana holding it’s ground but worry about the consequences. The back door gun controllers just wont stop. I’m curious, as to what
they will do about this, as well.
I understand there are several differences, however If we compare ourselves to the fall of the Soviet Union it may look like this. Many similar
circumstances, besides losing the arms race.
Some even blame Reagan for bankrupting them. Here are a few comparisons. Does all this sound familiar?
No quality goods to export in order to balance imports, worsening market situation, economic indicators were routinely suppressed or falsified to the
point that when the final economic collapse was imminent, they became more cynical about the propaganda of government controlled media, and the loss
of the war in Afghanistan,
After coming in to power, Gorbachev implemented domestic economic reforms, nationalism spread throughout the entire Soviet Union, their nation was
soon ripped apart by separatist movements.
Next I expect to see a new flag flying in our states and Countries.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 05:05 PM by Digital_Reality
|
   
Its about time a state actually stand on its own and not get suckered into letting the rights of their citizens get taken away by some loophole.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 05:08 PM by ExPostFacto
|
    
This is an awesome point in history where the states are taking their power back as dictated by the constitution.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |