It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Triangle UFO on Nasa Photo

page: 7
10
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by JimOberg
 


Wing diagram



Mockup of RCC panel 9





posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Cant we just take a leisure flight without all you guys picking it up. I would like you try and explain a 2 million dollar flight to DC




posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 09:43 AM
link   
reply to post by tristar
 


Where did you find that image?

If you don't mind me asking.


u2u if you want.



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 10:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Exuberant1
reply to post by tristar
 


Where did you find that image?

If you don't mind me asking.


u2u if you want.


I cant recall exactly, funny how i loose my memory that selectively, but i can say that this was mailed to me roughly about 4-5 years ago, obviously now i assume its all over the net.



[edit on 23-6-2009 by tristar]



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 10:50 AM
link   
reply to post by tristar
 


That triangle has to be at least 70 feet in length.

Those are f-111s flying escort.

That triangle is a bomber...


*pretty low-quality image though - and it is Black'n'white. It could be photoshopped; possibly an image of a shopped image.

It is neat.



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   
Baby brother 1994-7 not sure.


(click to open player in new window)



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by JimObergSo who's gonna order this image through FOIA.


FOIA not necessary... but a deep pocket is




Re: NASA image STS61C-31-2

I got the negative too late to take it last night, but will deliver it this afternoon.

Jody Russell
Still Photo & Video Librarian / Researcher
Media Resource Center
NASA Johnson Space Center
Bldg. 423 / AP32 / JIMMS
2101 NASA Parkway
Houston, TX 77058


This is the original 70mm negative



Bay Area Imaging wrote:
> Ron,
>
> Please notify Jody Russell at the Media Resource Center to pull that negative so she can bring it over to me. If you would please call us with your credit card information so we can get started on your order, I will also keep you up to date when Jody delivers the neg to me and when I can have this all mailed out to you.
>
> The price for the scan is: $65.00 unless you want to keep the scan at 150Mb for: $49.95.
> 1- 11x14 print on semi-gloss: $25.00
> 1 - CD: $ 4.49
> Shipping & Handling: $16.00
>
> Total: $110.49 plus tax (unless you live outside of Texas)



I thinks this will look great on the wall..

Caption "NASA SAYS - "Space Debris"



Seriously though I hope a 600 DPI scan will show some details



That would look great on the wall!
I should walk over to the Dryden building and see if they can identify it. LOL!



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Exuberant1
Where did you find that image?
If you don't mind me asking.


Why ask the spook?

Its from here
hubpages.com...

But here there is a similar version. Notice any difference?



www.ufo.se...

I like this one

SR-91 Aurora in X-Plane 8.60





[edit on 23-6-2009 by zorgon]



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 05:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by LSWONE
That would look great on the wall!
I should walk over to the Dryden building and see if they can identify it. LOL!


The 600 dpi scan will allow printing



posted on Jun, 23 2009 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


I may be mistaken, but I think that Exuberant1 was not talking about that photo, that was posted after he asked, I think he(?) was talking about this image.




posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

But here there is a similar version. Notice any difference?




It is much sharper than the larger version contributed by Tristar.

And the larger B&W image does appear to have a marking or something on the x-plane which is not on the smaller one - I have to get my magnifier to double-check.

The tail-end of it has also been altered in the blow-up image to hide something....

The colour image of that x-plane - do you have a source for it?

Armap, do you?



[edit on 24-6-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 01:44 AM
link   
The color one I seem to recall that posted at TAS somewhere and identified as a hoax.

Will see if I can find it


On the black and white one...



Aurora being refueled by a KC-135 tanker flanked by two F-111's. The picture was taken in 1995 over Cornwall, England.

However this picture is known to be a hoax and was made for a UK magazine called 'Astronomy Now'. It was captioned 'A simulation of the refuelling of the top secret 'Aurora''


www.militaryairshows.co.uk...



AH Here we are...

Photos Of Advanced
Stealth Or Aurora?
10-10-2



The following four images were found on a Chinese website and forwarded to us for possible identification. Please send in any pertinent information...


www.rense.com...

[edit on 24-6-2009 by zorgon]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 01:54 AM
link   
reply to post by zorgon
 


Thanks zorgon,

There was something fishy about them images...

And nowadays we have remote controlled toy Jets that look like military aircraft - it can be hard to tell what is real from a photo.

Especially without proper context (Tristar
)



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 03:46 AM
link   
With so many active people on the internet at any given time not to mention that Google and Youtube, having merged, Yahoo and now Bing are all locked in with Government contracts the easiest method of discrediting is to simply do what one has always been doing.

I am not suggesting anything here, but i do feel you should read the comments carefully within the url as to the reply of the so called images. (Does my signature fit like a glove here)

--

Perhaps a quick lesson of refreshing your memory is needed here. Lets take ourselves back to the 80's. Do you remember this



IN NOVEMBER 1988 a decade of secrecy was lifted from one of the most enigmatic aircraft projects of all time: the Lockheed F-117A stealth fighter. In the 10 years since the program was officially announced by the Carter administration, numerous reports have been published in both the technical and popular media about the aircraft. Now that the program has moved out of the "black" (secrecy) realm, it is possible to review the reports on the project, assess their accuracy, and discuss whether or not they compromised the aircraft's technology or operational capabilities.


www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil...


At about now you should have read the link, so i am asking one simple question.

Do you notice anything familiar with the Stealth and its media mechanics in comparison with the Aurora. ?



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by tristar

Do you notice anything familiar with the Stealth and its media mechanics in comparison with the Aurora. ?


Information about the F-117 was carefully controlled and released by order.

...Now with the Aurora, the Media is totally controlled from the top-down (mockingbird has become the Mainstream Media) - and thus, any information release is only possible with permission.

*And let us not forget UFOs - Both programmes had civilians referring to the still classified crafts as Alien UFOs and both had their very own disinformation contingents.

Some Countries under our surveillance are far less likely to shoot down what they think are visitors from another star system than a military craft from their own planet.

[edit on 24-6-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on Jun, 24 2009 @ 05:26 AM
link   
You need to read between the lines, don't skip through it, it mentions what you and thousands are asking all time. The paragraph places the actual fighter as a second priority.



A report in a June 1981 issue of Aviation Week & Space Technology regarding bomber proposals mentioned some interesting facts about the stealth fighter. The report mentioned that the Lockheed demonstrator was currently flying against Soviet equipment, presumably in Nevada. The aircraft were described as physically "rounded." A Pentagon official, who was not named, described the technology as working "better than we have a right to expect." The article also made reference to a fighter-sized stealth aircraft designed by Northrop that was expected to have its first flight "soon."22


edit: Sorry for taking the thread elsewhere so ill move the rest of the conversation to the appropriate thread.


[edit on 24-6-2009 by tristar]



posted on Sep, 8 2010 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by tristar
 


Interesting that there are no posts after tristar's...

More than interesting, perhaps?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join