reply to post by Masonic Light
The mistaking of Parsons for Crowley I think is a probable one.
I'm a little foggy on the particulars as that is accessing memory kept in storage for too many decades, but I'm pretty certain Crowley only knew of
Hubbard from Hubbard's infamous reputation which preceded him, and from very meager and brief correspondence.
And as for your previous post, I wasn't intending to (re)open a proverbial can of worms. I think the bifurcation of the O.T.O. tree even long before
Grady McMurtry, if one looks at just those groups that shot off in 1922 or even earlier in 1906-1912, leaves plenty of room for all to acknowledge
that there are many groups that in the least claim O.T.O. lineage and that direct succession is just as much a thorny bramble to navigate in regards
to the O.T.O. as it would be to regard the Pedigrees of European Nobility.
I was just wanting to point out where the difference between the "Caliphate" O.T.O. came from in concerns with just O.T.O. Considering the OP's
encounter was, most likely, with a "Caliphate" O.T.O. group I figured it would be best to focus on that.
Thank you though for pointing out my error with the London Grand Lodge and the Parisian Grand Lodge connection.
I know that Crowley also possessed questionable Masonic Charters, also from John Yarker, that were tied in to the York Rite Grand Lodge of Mexico, but
I think those have always been highly disputed and commonly considered to be essentially invalid. Although the trading of Charters was not an uncommon
practice at the beginning of the last century...nor was it uncommon to gain degrees in a particular Order the very same way. I guess some would
whitewash the practice in their minds if no money was exchanged for doing such.