In this link, there are quite a lot of numbers, heights and planes named:
FBI Special Agent Bill Crowley said Saturday that a civilian business jet flying to Johnstown -- about 20 miles north of the crash site -- was
within 20 miles of the low-flying airliner, but at an altitude of 37,000 feet.
Crowley also said there was a C-130 military cargo aircraft about 17 miles away flying at 24,000 feet when Flight 93 crashed. The military plane had
no weapons on board. Crowley said he did not know where it was coming from or going, but said its crew reported seeing smoke or dust near the crash
Recovery teams found the plane's cockpit voice recorder just after sundown Friday.
The plane's flight data recorder was discovered Thursday.
Btw, FBI Special Agent Bill Crowley was also involved in the Oklahoma City bombing cover-up. I have posted extensively on that in this forum and on
another site I linked to. Search and you will find.
I now remember clearly what I heard in the audio link provided by Boone 870, that the flight controller clearly stated to a colleague that he had
ordered already all planes in the vicinity down, except JUST ONE, the military plane.
First a small Cessna within 3 miles of 93, which pilot was asked if he could see the plane to verify location, and then was 'immediately' told to
leave the area.
So, how come the flight controller didn't see that business plane flying to Johnstown Airport on his radar scope?
And neither the Falcon business jet reported by news media, to be found on the History Commons pages I linked to? That's the Warren Buffet owned
business jet that followed flight 93 for a substantial period of time.
As you can read in those pages, there clearly were TWO business jets around flight 93.
And what about the E-3 Sentry AWACS plane alongside two F-16s in hot pursuit of flight 93.
And the little white drone with van-like proportions reported by Susan McElwain? (Too low probably, to have been shown on FAA radar.)
It seemed to have been quite busy above Lambertsville and Shanksville, while we only hear ONE military plane mentioned in that audio snippet from
the FAA flight controller.
May I repeat a snippet of info I provided already at this crucial moment in my thought process :
Airborne electronic warfare consists of three major players forming a triad of capability. The EC-130H Compass Call, EA-6B Prowler and F-16CJ
Fighting Falcons suppress enemy air defenses while jamming communications, radar and command and control targets. Compass Call is in demand with all
unified commands, and therefore, subject to worldwide deployment in support of operations on very short notice.
1. That's a C-130 which could have easily been a disguised EC-130H, you can only spot the difference if you are an experienced plane spotter, and
then from nearby. It has two small pod like antennas at each side under the tail wings, and a few short antennas sticking out of it at various places.
I have posted big photos of the EC-130H somewhere in this forum, use the Search function.
2. That's a white Prowler which could have easily been the white plane reported by Viola Saylor, after she saw the supposed flight 93 nearly hit her
Oak tree in her back garden, passing over her house to the south.
3. That's two reported F-16 Fighting Falcons, which make the picture complete.
There was an EMP effect registered at the moments around the crash of flight 93, cell tower equipment had to be replaced weeks later, the electrical
power grid was outed and land-line phones went dead.
Anybody has another explanation than an EMP effect except the lame excuse of overloaded telephone grids during 9/11.(What about the Cell tower
equipment destroyed? And the electricity?)
Regarding the electricity :
regarding the outed cell tower :
[edit on 12/4/09 by LaBTop]