It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StellarX
The media is owned by American corporations who are by no means liberal. If you can point me to even a few major corporations who have owners that seems 'liberal' in their financial thinking ( who cares if their for gay rights??? ) i would be most surprised to hear about it.
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by intelinside451
The liberals and Obama are loving these "stimulus" bills.
Not as much as the 'conservatives' but perhaps that is arguing about which red apple is the darkest red. Both parties representative structures are filled with mostly greedy swine who will steal as much as they think they can get away with.
It's just another way to make the government bigger in their eyes.
If you go look at the spending of various governments in the last century you will find that both are prodigious spenders with the democratic party not spending all that much less.
At least Bush publicly said many times he was very disappointed that he had to sign them but he felt he had to at the time.
Where on Earth did he say that? How did you get the impression that Bush did not want to make his Wall street buddies richer? Have you ever heard of a liberal corporate owner? Bah.
Probably from all the liberal vultures in congress and in the media putting pressure on him.
The media is owned by American corporations who are by no means liberal. If you can point me to even a few major corporations who have owners that seems 'liberal' in their financial thinking ( who cares if their for gay rights??? ) i would be most surprised to hear about it.
Funny how nothings changed since Obama took office but no one is saying anything about the same exact issues to obama.
It is funny how American such as yourself can be fooled into this partisan bickering while you are getting ripped off to the tune of litterally trillions. Is it so easy to fool you into hating Obama and 'liberals' for doing almost exactly ( well actually doing so so slowly that the conservatives are calling them incompetant and worse) what the conservatives were doing?
So much for being for seeing trough the facade that is the conspiracy by both major American parties to cooperate as best they can in the financial looting of the USA.
Stellar
Originally posted by jdub297
Here's one:
AIG 2008 Donations
No.1 Chris Dodd $130k+
No.2 Barack Obama $100k+
The Center for Public Integrity has criticized Dodd for "being the leading advocate in the Senate on behalf of the accounting industry."[11][12] Political consultant and commentator Dick Morris wrote that Dodd had received more from accounting firm Arthur Andersen than any other Democrat and bore responsibility for trying to shield accounting firms from investor fraud liability in cases such as the Enron scandal.[13]
en.wikipedia.org...
As far as media, are you going to say that TIME, WaPo, NYT, LAT, CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC and CBS are NOT liberal?
Originally posted by jdub297
Originally posted by StellarX
The media is owned by American corporations who are by no means liberal. If you can point me to even a few major corporations who have owners that seems 'liberal' in their financial thinking ( who cares if their for gay rights??? ) i would be most surprised to hear about it.
Here's one:
AIG 2008 Donations
No.1 Chris Dodd $130k+
No.2 Barack Obama $100k+
As far as media, are you going to say that TIME, WaPo, NYT, LAT, CNN, NBC, ABC, MSNBC and CBS are NOT liberal?
Why is it that there is such a buzz about these supposed "Tea Parties" when it is impossible to find any info on them? The MSM is for the most part ignoring them, and doing a google search only yields results about the worldnetdaily news story or stories about the stories. There are pics of some small-ish demonstrations, but I have yet to find one iota of evidence that any are actually being organized. Where are these? I can find the latest NAMBLA meeting info for any state in the country, but I cannot find one Tea Party?
History records that the money changers have used every intrigue deceit and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance -- James Madison
Originally posted by jdub297
You asked for ONE example; I gave you the one off the top of my head.
As for the MEDIA, they are undeniably liberal in every respect.
If you want to discuss ownership, these are publicly traded and "owned" by millions of shareholders.
You keep referring to corporate support of homosexuals as an indication of "liberal."As with Obama, corporate actions speak louder than who they support with their words.
The biggest thieves in Congress and the administration have been supported by some of the largest corporations, regardless of who they say they support.
I'm glad you've got a conscience. Now let's work on consciousness. The truth and answers are everywhere.
Are there any "Tea Parties" in South Africa this year?
Deny Ignorance.
jw
Originally posted by irishchic
IMO,many should NOT have had those houses to start with,sorry.
It's not your "God given right" to own a home,especially is you put no money down when you buy it
and they knew that you couldn't afford the payments when you filled out the paperwork(low doc of course) they so graciously steered you through for a house that was probably MUCH more than you really needed?
I own my home: I worked hard and put a percentage down when I bought it,it was something I could afford,and I paid it off in my lifetime.
I'm a dinosaur,I know.
I think what they should have "done" was to not instill even more of an entitlement attitude to a segment of society that was ill-equipted to cope in order to further their own greed-soaked agenda.
I am all for these peaceful demonstrations that at least let the people in power know we're not all drinking the Kool Aid.
Hoping they will in fact be peaceful and make a statement that can't continue to be ignored...isn't that what "Democracy" is all about,the people's voices being heard?
Seriously, do you know what would of happened if they hadn't done something? Do you realize how many more people would of lost their houses?
Originally posted by wylekat
Not to mention all of those poor execs who wouldn't have gotten billions in bonuses. *derisive snort*
Originally posted by neo67
"one party fights for the people"
" one party fights for the rich"
thats the biggest bunch of bs i have ever read.
they both fight for control of you and thats its it.