It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
Is it possible for a phenomenon to be real and yet not provable by scientific method?
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
But what if the phenomenon under study was intelligent and being deliberately deceptive in order to hide its true nature?
You missed the operative statement.
You've been here all of a week. Hardly enough time to declare ATS rife with anything.
Explain how it is hollow? You have done nothing but dismiss it out of hand, saying by concerns are invalid by virtue of them existing. This makes no sense.
The fact you are so concerned about defining what skeptics are allowed to do is proof
You do not want to worry about arguments, you want to dismiss a person based on a label.
f you think someone is a bogus skeptic, you will not have to concern yourself with any of their arguments.
Originally posted by spitefulgod
Where is the evidence that can be taken to a wide scientific audiences and proved as extra terrestrial.... there is none, just a load of "look at me"s and a few trivial "could be this or that" pictures.
Sure they could be here and the government could be doing one hell of a job to cover it up, but from what I've seen on this site and others. The images and videos seem to have the same following as the paranormal images.. flying orbs, cgi hoaxes and "eyewitness" accounts.
When I see something I'll believe.
Originally posted by Malcram
So why are you repeating this little that mantra that I "have only been here a week"?
Originally posted by Malcram
You attack our supposed motivations rather than the definition of 'Bogus Skepticism' itself. That is ad hominem.
Originally posted by Malcram
And note, the label is applied to the argument, not the person.
Originally posted by Malcram
That is ad hominem. Stop making accusations about what I supposedly secretly want and deal with the issue itself. You are attacking my motives, which you don't know.
Originally posted by Malcram
I assure you, if I think someone using "bogus skepticism" I will show very keen interest in their arguments, in order to demonstrate that they are employing bogus skepticism.
Originally posted by poomouth
From a more practical perspective, most of us know that the skeptic is a dying breed. Healthy skepticism is one thing obviously, a "skeptic" however is a radical, overly obsessed with their own viewpoint.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
Is it possible for a phenomenon to be real and yet not provable by scientific method?
Originally posted by poomouth
From a more practical perspective, most of us know that the skeptic is a dying breed. Healthy skepticism is one thing obviously, a "skeptic" however is a radical, overly obsessed with their own viewpoint.
These are not people who live healthy balanced lives. The skeptic physiologically may have some hemispherical cerebral imbalance, with the left obviously pronounced. Simply put, they will usually have very little interest in creative endeavors and their personality most likely lacks those empathic qualities that most would consider normal.
Afterall, mainstream science has been at the point of accepting that the substance of the universe is mere connection/communication for some time now.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
Skeptics argue FTL is an impossibility, where as most physics proffs will tell you that the laws of physics do not support the idea.
Originally posted by TrueBrit
You see skeptics are trying to argue against a race of beings umpteen hundred times our IQ...
Originally posted by chronox12
I've been into this sorta thing for years on end but still there's nothing solid to go on. Just speculation. Now personally I have seen these flying saucers four times in my life and at a very close range might I add, but I still can't prove anything to anyone or even myself that what I witnessed was extraterrestrial in nature.
Originally posted by nablator
Originally posted by chronox12
I've been into this sorta thing for years on end but still there's nothing solid to go on. Just speculation. Now personally I have seen these flying saucers four times in my life and at a very close range might I add, but I still can't prove anything to anyone or even myself that what I witnessed was extraterrestrial in nature.
Very good post. Many of us on this forum have seen things that we can't explain. Or we wouldn't be here looking for answers. I saw a big red sphere for a few seconds near Paris. Europa saw two gray orbs in Miami. We're both skeptical of the proposed explanations, not about the phenomenon itself. Have you posted a report somewhere? I'd be interested to read it.
Originally posted by nablator
Many of us on this forum have seen things that we can't explain. Or we wouldn't be here looking for answers...
Originally posted by iwantobelieve
Can we ever approach this subject objectively? How do we know when we are? I think the skeptic's dilemma is just this. To call a skeptic...close minded is counter-productive.