It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Majorion
Thoughts?.. opinions?.. can it be debunked?
Originally posted by franspeakfree
NASA know, all astronauts are sworn to secrecy under the official secret act...
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
How about asking "what is it?"
Originally posted by Majorion
Okay SaviorComplex. What is it?
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
There are a great many things it could be, it fits the very strict definition of a UFO.
Originally posted by Majorion
You seem to be referring to a very specific object Savior, would you be so kind to point it out for us, at what minute did you see it?
Early in the flight the propellant spewed in a conical pattern, "like a snowstorm for five miles up into space," according to Commander Jim Wetherbee. The Russians didn’t want Discovery to come within 1,000 feet of Mir. But NASA flight controllers and the Discovery crew "worked the problem," at times rolling the Orbiter to warm the thrusters in the Sun.
Originally posted by Phage
A little basic research reveals the cause of the blizzard. STS-63 had a leaky RCS jet. It was so bad that it caused a lot of concern about the planned rendezvous with Mir.
Early in the flight the propellant spewed in a conical pattern, "like a snowstorm for five miles up into space," according to Commander Jim Wetherbee. The Russians didn’t want Discovery to come within 1,000 feet of Mir. But NASA flight controllers and the Discovery crew "worked the problem," at times rolling the Orbiter to warm the thrusters in the Sun.
history.nasa.gov...
But of course that had nothing to do with it.
Originally posted by branty
No offense my friend , we all know that NASA doesn't lie,
So i'll assume they are wrong
Originally posted by Phage
Are you a jackass?