It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We wanted to get in contact with you because we just received an extremely cool piece of UFO video footage.
The research team behind History’s UFO Hunters have uncovered the first known daylight sighting of a triangle shaped flying object. Shot in 2004 in California, the footage has yet to be explained.
You can view the footage here: www.youtube.com...
We think that your readers would be excited about this footage!
Originally posted by SlinkyDFW
This was just posted on the UFOcasebook site. Has anyone seen this video before?
www.ufocasebook.com...
We wanted to get in contact with you because we just received an extremely cool piece of UFO video footage.
The research team behind History’s UFO Hunters have uncovered the first known daylight sighting of a triangle shaped flying object. Shot in 2004 in California, the footage has yet to be explained.
You can view the footage here: www.youtube.com...
We think that your readers would be excited about this footage!
Interesting vid. Looking for debunkers or confirmation.
Originally posted by Learhoag
I viewed the video a few times and it isn't a triangular craft. It looks more like 3 craft, whether human or otherwise, flying in a triangular formation that strays ever so gently. I don't see anything connecting the 3 light sources together.
The video is jerky. It should have been synchronized so that the triangular shape stayed steady. There should have been a third version (first one is straight on, the second color treated) which should have been done solarized (don't know if that's the proper term for the effect I intend) or negative turned positive.
Why does this footage need to be explained? It has to be treated intelligently.
The claims are weak.
Originally posted by SlinkyDFW
reply to post by Learhoag
I just thought the conversation between the guys in the video was genuine, more than others I've seen. He was insistant on getting another camera, making phone calls to others, etc.
I'd be hard pressed to toss this one out as a hoax. Don't know.
Originally posted by Shakezoola
Yet again another crappy, blurry, inconclusive video.
2nd