It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
To end part of this discussion, the fuel igniting wasn't an "explosion". Explosives cause explosions. This isn't a Hollywood movie where you shoot the gas tank of a car and the whole car explodes into pieces. Mythbusters did a show on that and proved that it cannot happen. They use nitroglycerin in the movies to make cars explode like that.
Here's some NASA footage from 1984 of a Boeing 707 (which the towers were desinged to withstand) being remote controlled into a crash landing. Watch the ignition of the jet fuel. Notice the ignition of jet fuel doesn't blow the plane or the dummies inside to pieces?
Two different views:
www.youtube.com...
www.metacafe.com...
Originally posted by D.Duck
Funny that wing explode on impact with that little wall and made a large fireball but on 9/11 the aluminum wings didn't explode on impact.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
It didn't even slow down (2nd plane) when it hit, and it should have done.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by thesneakiod
It didn't even slow down (2nd plane) when it hit, and it should have done.
A 300,000 pound object travelling at 500+mph will not stop on a dime. It took the massive cores of the buildings to stop those planes and is evident by the swaying of the buildings after impact.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Ive sat many times on a plane looking at the wings, and they are as flimsy as hell. They could not at any speed slice through steel.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by thesneakiod
It didn't even slow down (2nd plane) when it hit, and it should have done.
A 300,000 pound object travelling at 500+mph will not stop on a dime. It took the massive cores of the buildings to stop those planes and is evident by the swaying of the buildings after impact.
I'm not saying I expected it to stop dead, but i would've expected it to at least slow down. Thing is _BoneZ_ im trying to fathom out why the tail section, not to mention the wings went through with little or no resistance.
I admit the fuselage could possibly, possibly make it through, if you take the plastic straw through a tree in a hurricane scenario.
But not the wings. Man, Ive sat many times on a plane looking at the wings, and they are as flimsy as hell. They could not at any speed slice through steel.
All my own opinions of course.
Originally posted by D.Duck
A 767 explods on impact with the tower.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
I do think that something hit those buildings that day but i think they were missiles.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
the amature stuff could easily have been tampered with.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by D.Duck
A 767 explods on impact with the tower.
Stop peddling your disinfo. A B-25 bomber didn't explode against the Empire State building. It went into the ESB, just like the towers. That's proof enough. Stop spamming the same garbage over and over that you have no proof of what-so-ever.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
I do think that something hit those buildings that day but i think they were missiles.
Missiles are much smaller than the planes that impacted and therefore wouldn't make nearly the size hole. Secondly, missiles have explosive warheads and likely would've destroyed the top half of the tower. Missiles don't carry jet fuel that ignite in a huge fireball. Lastly, missiles don't come close to weighing 300,000 pounds causing the buildings to sway. I have video evidence of the swaying, just won't be able to post it until this weekend.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
the amature stuff could easily have been tampered with.
How? All media videos, amateur videos AND home videos show exactly the same thing. How the hell would you let someone tamper with your home video that you made? You would scream to every media outlet that would listen to you that the government tampered with your home video. This "theory" isn't even close to plausible.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
reply to post by _BoneZ_
Then that picture of the damage only reiterates my point. If the wings and judging by the what looks to be the charred markings from the tail only damaged the outer sections, then where did they go?
In all the videos the plane goes straight through, infact you could say the building swallows it whole.
If you go by the scenario you say happened then debris would have fell from the tower before the explosion.
Admittedly im basing this on only what Ive seen on videos, docs, etc and they look extremely dodgy to me. I do think that something hit those buildings that day (yeh planes! your probably screaming at me) but i think they were missiles. All the amature videos (well most) didn't come out on the day it happened and all we saw were major tv network footage, the amature stuff could easily have been tampered with.
I also can't explain how so many people saw it happen if the NPT is supposedly true. Its that one piece of logic that puts a doubt in my mind.
That is the one thing that needs to be overcome for the NPT to have any real lasting ground.
[edit on 9-3-2009 by thesneakiod]
Originally posted by D.Duck
it never penetrated the ESB
The fuselage of the plane disintegrated into the 78th and 79th floor killing all four onboard the B-25
Originally posted by D.Duck
Yes it was a missile and I think it was a AGM-158 JASSM it look like a small plane.
Originally posted by czacza1
reply to post by daeoeste
hello again. this time I give you a star for a change. you are totally right.
this is a provocation, not a real thread.
cheers