Kennedy knighted?? what about the constitution?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 4-3-2009 @ 04:10 PM by Iamonlyhuman
Brown told the senator on Tuesday night that Queen Elizabeth II had made him a member of British nobility. In his speech, Brown referred to the senator as "Sir Edward Kennedy" and called him a "great friend."


Ok, so I get that it's a great honor for Senator Kennedy and that he's done a lot of good during his tenure and that he probably won't live much longer and that they probably wanted to give this honor to him while he was alive but WHAT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION?????? Yeah the document's old and all but we American's always talk about it like it's supposed to mean something. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recall anything in the constitution that says these requirements are void if you're really old and about to die! I'm seriously getting so disillusioned with everything political, not one person ANYWHERE has mentioned the fact that this is against the constitution - I was so sure when I checked ATS that someone would have caught this... but NOOOO. NOBODY CARES ANYMORE!!!

Article I; Section 9:
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.


Ok, rant over... smile.. take a breath....

Edited to fix links... but then I heard a loud sucking sound coming from Senator Kennedy's website and found this:

Kennedy on Honorary Knighthood

WASHINGTON DC- Senator Edward M. Kennedy today released the following statement after the British government announced he will be designated a Knight Commander, Order of the British Empire:

“I’m deeply grateful to Her Majesty the Queen and to Prime Minister Brown for this extraordinary honor. I have always prized the opportunity to work with the British government and strengthen and deepen the role of our two countries as leading beacons of democracy in the world. I am proud that I was able to play a part in the decades-long effort to bring peace to Northern Ireland. I also think of my ties to Britain that stretch back across the years—from my childhood to the Kennedy Scholars today who come from Britain to study in America. It was from Britain that my oldest brother left for his last mission during World War II. It is in Britain that a portion of land at Runnymede, where the Magna Carta was signed, is now designated as American soil and dedicated to President Kennedy as a gift of the British people.

“So for me this honor is moving and personal— a reflection not only of my public life, but of things that profoundly matter to me as an individual. I accept this honor in the spirit in which it is given, with a continuing commitment to be a voice for the voiceless and for the shared ideals of freedom and fairness which are so fundamental to the character of our two countries.”


[edit on 4/3/2009 by Iamonlyhuman]






Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.

Thank you for your compliance and understanding.

[edit on 3/5/2009 by kinglizard]


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:12 PM by skeptic1
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman



It is honorary....not real.

I admit, it is kind of odd, but it is only honorary.


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:18 PM by skeptic1
reply to post by Blueracer



I don't know if you were talking to me, but here is a link to the "honorary knighthood" story.

Kennedy Honorary Knighthood


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:26 PM by Frogs
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to
post by Iamonlyhuman



It is honorary....not real.

I admit, it is kind of odd, but it is only honorary.


Yes - its just an honorary title. The article below explains it a little better.

Times Online - Kennedy Knighted

Unlike British citizens honoured by knighthoods, Senator Kennedy will not be given the title 'Sir Ted', which is not permitted for foreign recipients. Instead, he will simply be allocated the initials KBE - Knight of the British Empire - after his name.


For what its worth - several others from the US that have been given honorary knighthood over the years - Bill Gates, Rudy Giuliani, Steven Spielberg, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Alan Greenspan, etc..


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:26 PM by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to
post by Iamonlyhuman



It is honorary....not real.

I admit, it is kind of odd, but it is only honorary.


According to him it's: Knight Commander, Order of the British Empire


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:27 PM by skeptic1
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman



Did you read the story I linked to?

It is honorary only.


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 04:34 PM by Iamonlyhuman
Originally posted by Frogs
Originally posted by skeptic1
reply to
post by Iamonlyhuman



It is honorary....not real.

I admit, it is kind of odd, but it is only honorary.


Yes - its just an honorary title. The article below explains it a little better.

Times Online - Kennedy Knighted

Unlike British citizens honoured by knighthoods, Senator Kennedy will not be given the title 'Sir Ted', which is not permitted for foreign recipients. Instead, he will simply be allocated the initials KBE - Knight of the British Empire - after his name.


For what its worth - several others from the US that have been given honorary knighthood over the years - Bill Gates, Rudy Giuliani, Steven Spielberg, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Alan Greenspan, etc..



For the record, the Time Online article was posted before it was announced. When PM Brown was announcing it he referred to him as Sir Edward and on Sir Edward's website he himself says his title is "Knight Commander, Order of the British Empire". In any case, honorary or otherwise it's still a title of distinction which is unlawful for a sitting Senator.


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 07:27 PM by AllTiedTogether
reply to post by Iamonlyhuman



I think people seem to think the founding fathers were stupid or something. This is the reason they put these types of rules into their constitution, into their Bill of Rights etc. The reason you wouldn't want anyone having a Knighthood in the US government is that although you think it only in title, it also carries with it duties. If someone holding a Knighthood was to talk against the monarchy, they would have the title removed. He speaks well of the monarchy in his daily dealings and his secret dealings that are exact what got him this title in the first place.

Just like all the big singers that get Knighted. They have put forth their contribution to the masses for the monarchy. They push the agenda forward and cover up and assist the corrupt politicians which get them noted by the ruling classes. Bono, Jagger, Striesand, all recognized in some way for their contributions toward the NWO. All very political too....

Rgds
S&F


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 07:40 PM by JBA2848
reply to post by AllTiedTogether



I can't possible think that Ozzy Osbourne is politcal in any way. Ozzy was given the honary knight hood.


reply posted on 4-3-2009 @ 08:23 PM by AllTiedTogether
reply to post by JBA2848



His lyrics incited certain people to act in certain ways. Anyone who listens to it is affected in some way. I know people who listened to him and believed he spoke for the devil and therefore read about and dressed in black like the devil. Music is not the only example. You will find the same in other types of media, the monarchy also gives Knighthoods to media like Ed R Murrows and Alistair Cooke.

Each person is more or less a public speaker for the monarchy. Like a KofC fourth degree member, its an honorary title. Like the mason 34th degree is honorary I believe(don't jump on me... it's not a mason thread). You may hear them speak in favor of the monarchy or they may do something to the monarchies benefit that you don't know or hear about. Like maybe doing something politically that would enable your country to be taken over by the EU or the monarchy. You get the point..,.



[edit on 4-3-2009 by AllTiedTogether]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 0 days ago with 9 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 1 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags