It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
From what I see, every accepted translation is waaay off. The translators seem to have been politically motivated. The King James Version seems to be the closest at times, but at other times it is grammatically incorrect or otherwise confusing.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
The big issue, in my opinion, is that the Church tries hard to convince people that they cannot have God without either the Church or Jesus.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Those who have tried the Christian thing -- and decided that they don't like it -- convince themselves that because the Church is false, God must also be false. They then proclaim themselves to be "rational" or "humanistic," although their entire life-purpose is based on nothing but false reactionsim.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Then there are people who insist that humans are a freakish casualty of the Primordial Soup.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
I've become convinced that atheism is simply a tool of the Illuminati, for those who have been beaten into submission by others falsely proclaiming themselves to be "religious"
Originally posted by WiseSheep
Yes even the most brainwashed quotes such as "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of god" or "if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us" are something worth uncovering.
With your education, wouldn't you agree that one would more rightly say that "all are at fault and do not compare to the dignity of the creator" or "if we agree concerning our corruption, he is faithful and just to forgive us"?
The motivation wouldn't be political as much as it is babylonian. Based on all that I've learned what parades itself around in this last day blaspheming the creator and his son is nothing more than the same tongue tied crowd that resulted from attempting to build their first tower to his throne.
Is it because maybe that their gods are their church(s) (plural mind you) that they have built?
All this when Jesus states plainly that he builds his church.
Wouldn't it be no different if they say they have tried callousing their knees bowing to an onion or chanting to a rock, or banging their head against a wall?
Religion is religion. Bondage, an attempt by lucifer to control his uncontrollable.
This has nothing to do with the creator. He sent his son to set men free not make them slaves to insanity.
That must explain their source of intelligence.
If you let that idea control you, then you have also taken their bait.
This notion of illuminati may sell books and make a decent profit for the preachers of it, but the thing is deeper than flesh and blood or some small elite group of people that don't know their heads from a hole in the ground.
The "Illuminati" is a nickname for a group that seeks to exert control over as much as possible. Part of their plan to accomplish this involves convincing people to deny any higher power, in order to look towards other humans for protection.
Originally posted by Gazrok
If the Christian Bible is correct, then the majority of the world's population (as they aren't Christians) are doomed to hell...
Originally posted by riley
The "Illuminati" is a nickname for a group that seeks to exert control over as much as possible. Part of their plan to accomplish this involves convincing people to deny any higher power, in order to look towards other humans for protection.
Opposed to telling people that the pope is the spiritual authority? The catholic church has spent the last millenia not only convincing people but forcing them (under threat of death) into believing they need a human mediator to that "higher power" to look to for protection and leadership.
An atheist could say "do as I say because I know best"
A believer could say "god said to do as I say because I.. er. he knows best"
Both require putting faith into other human beings so whats the difference? You can cry "evil illuminati conspiring to control people" yet the church has been doing exactly that anyway.
[edit on 12-3-2009 by riley]
Originally posted by riley
Which is?
there's a difference between atheists and the illuminati.. you've yet to show us any evidence that they're connected. You are however trying to control people by spreading propoganda on behalf of a belief system so you kind of proved my point; the illuminati claim was just scare mongering.
There may have been a group that were offering protection from the church when they were hunting and charging scientists, intellectuals etc. with heracy. Thats not the same as denying a higher power.
[edit on 13-3-2009 by riley]
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
I'm not saying that the Illuminati themselves are atheists, rather that they pragmatically employ atheism to accomplish their agenda. They control social "movements" like the rationalists and the nihilists, while in reality they don't even practice what they preach.
No, there are people who explicitly say that God does not exist.
Some groups offering protection from the Church, in turn, believe that humans can accomplish anything and everything that will ever be possible. That is atheism.
Originally posted by yeahright
Originally posted by Gazrok
If the Christian Bible is correct, then the majority of the world's population (as they aren't Christians) are doomed to hell...
BZZZZZT! Wrong.
A careful and thorough study and contemplation of the Bible (Without the interference of your basic religious dogma televangelist-type agenda pushers) will actually reveal just the opposite.
But don't take my word for it.
Originally posted by riley
So you haven't got any proof of this I take it?
I'm an atheist but it had nothing to do with some secret organisation corrupting my thoughts. Only 1-5% apx of the population are atheist.. there's alot more power and willing followers in cults/religion and atheists are notoriously difficult to command so your theory that the illuminati are an atheist organisation is a absurd.
Whats so wrong with that? there are people who say he does. each to their own.
So an open mind is a bad thing now?
Some people say that anything is possible.
Some people say that anything is possible.. if you pray for it.
It's all just sharing human knowledge back and forth.. one just claims it's divine. having a bigger ego doesn't make him more right.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Re:20:15: And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Originally posted by yeahright
Originally posted by B.A.C.
Re:20:15: And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
You'll have to be more specific. I want to make sure I understand what you take to be the significance of that. And why.
If the Christian Bible is correct, then the majority of the world's population (as they aren't Christians) are doomed to hell...
Originally posted by yeahright
Okay, let's go back to the original comment from Gazrok that caused my response in this thread (being... "BZZZZZT! Wrong."
If the Christian Bible is correct, then the majority of the world's population (as they aren't Christians) are doomed to hell...
So are you now using the verses from Revelation you're citing as a refutation to my belief that the majority of the world's population is not in fact "doomed to hell"? In other words, the verses you're quoting you believe are evidence that the majority of the world's population is in fact "doomed to hell"?
Originally posted by yeahright
Oh I understand. I just don't think the Lake of Fire is what you apparently believe it to be. I can't find any scriptural evidence whatsoever that it is designed to be a place of eternal torment and torture for non-Christians. I do however believe I can support a claim that the Lake of Fire is a place which will serve to make even the worst of us worthy. It is symbolic (not a literal, physical lake of fire) as most of Revelation is. And I believe it is symbolic of the purifying spirit of God.
God wills that all be saved.
God's will WILL be done.
God is love.
Love never fails.
Originally posted by B.A.C.
You have an allegorical view, which is not the same view I have, that's all.
Originally posted by yeahright
Originally posted by B.A.C.
You have an allegorical view, which is not the same view I have, that's all.
I'd say the two views are about as far apart as they could possibly be and still be referring to the same topic. But I've been down this road enough to know the futility of it. I'm fine with leaving it right there.
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen
Originally posted by riley
So you haven't got any proof of this I take it?
I'm an atheist but it had nothing to do with some secret organisation corrupting my thoughts. Only 1-5% apx of the population are atheist.. there's alot more power and willing followers in cults/religion and atheists are notoriously difficult to command so your theory that the illuminati are an atheist organisation is a absurd.
Atheists are not so difficult to command once you push the right buttons, namely by pointing out injustices of the Catholic Church, or perceived injustice on the part of government.
I never said that the Illuminati itself is "an atheist organization"
An open mind can admit to imperfections (with one's person and with humanity as a whole), which is not how atheists roll. Being "open minded" doesn't guard one from being deceived.
The biggest ego of all is one that assumes that he and his buddies have all of the answers to all of life's questions.